rating systems; hot climates; PEARL; Estidama; LEED; QSAS; SI 5281; GPRS
[en] To develop adaptable and context sensitive building rating systems, the present work aimed to evaluate four rating systems that emerged recently in the Middle East. Literature review and cross comparison analysis showed that the four examined rating systems namely, Green Pyramid Rating System (Egypt), Green Building Standard SI 5281 (Israel), Qatar Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) and Pearl Building Rating System (UAE) are not enough adopted to local environmental, cultural, historical, societal and economic context. They showed also a comparable similarity since they all imitate the American LEED and British BREEAM rating systems. The paper elaborates on the comparison results and presents recommendations to improve the questioned rating systems and remind designers with the principles and strategies of sustainable design that goes beyond the existing rating systems in hot climate. The evaluation of the four systems might provide a new approach for regional harmonization among the four systems and the development of adaptable and context sensitive rating system.
Author, co-author :
Attia, Shady ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur A&U > Techniques de construction des bâtiments
The Usability of Green Building Rating Systems in Hot Arid Climates
Publication date :
24 February 2014
Event name :
Energy & Indoor Environment for Hot Climates
Event organizer :
Event place :
Event date :
Main work title :
ASHRAE Energy & Indoor Environment for Hot Climates
Ali, H., Al Nsairat, S. 2009, Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries - Case of Jordan, Building and Environment 44 1053-1064.
BREEAM Offices, 2011. Available at: http://www.breeam.org/page.jsp?id=17 [accessed 25.07.2013]
Cam C, Ong B., 2005 Building environmental assessment tools and the multidimensional pathways towards sustainable architecture, SB Tokyo p. 1738-45.
Coeudevez, C.S. and Deoux, S., 2011, Bátiments, santé, le tour des labels Ajouter l'humain aux performances environnementales et énergétiques, Medieco Editions Broché.
Davis, G., 2012, Hill International MEP expert calls QSAS a success, Construction Week Online, April 19th.
Elgendy, K., 2010a, Comparing Estidama's Pearl Rating System to LEED and BREEAM, available online: http://www.carboun.com accessed 19/01/2013.
Elgendy, K., 2010b, Energy Use in Buildings in the Middle East, online: http://www.carboun.com accessed 30/07/2013.
Estidama, 2010. The Pearl Rating System for Estidama, Building Rating System Design & Construction Version 1.0. Abu Dhabi Urban Planning Council.
Fadli, F., 2013, A comparative analysis of emerging contextual tools, focus on the MENA region, SB Munich, p997-1005.
GBCI, 2013, LEED Project Directory - Green Building Certification Institute.
GPRS, 2011. The Green Pyramid Rating System, Housing and Building National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Hurley, J., Horne, R., 2006. Review and Analysis of Tools for the Implementation and Assessment of Sustainable Urban Development, Environmental Institute of Australia and New Zealand Conference.
ISO 15392:2008 - Sustainability in building construction - General principles.
ISO/TR 21932:2004, Buildings & constructed assets - Sustainability in building construction: - Terminology.
ISO/TS 21929-1:2005, Sustainability in building construction - Sustainability indicators - Part 1: Framework for development of indicators for buildings.
Kuhn, E. et al. 2012, A Review of Methods and Tools Available for Environmental Assessment at Local Territorial Scale, PLEA, Lima, Perú.
LEED, 2009 for New Construction & Major Renovations. USGBC.
Open House Project, available online: http://www.openhouse-fp7.eu/about-project, Accessed 30/07/2013.
Oren, B., 2012, Development of tools for reviewing the green potential of existing buildings, in light of current environmental standards, M. Sc. Thesis, Technion, Haifa.
QSAS, 2010, Design Assessment for Commercial Buildings V. 1.0, TC Chan Center.
Shaviv E., 2011, "Do current environmental assessments methods provide a good measure of sustainability? PLEA, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium.
SI 5281, 2005. Buildings with reduced environmental impact Green Buildings. Standards Institution of Israel.
SI 5281-3, 2011. Sustainable Buildings ("Green Buildings"), Parts 3: Requirements for Office Buildings. The Standards Institution of Israel.
SI 5282-2, 2011. Energy Rating of Buildings, Parts 2: Office Buildings. Under Revision. The Standards Institution of Israel.
Wagner-Muschiol, R and Friedmann, T. 2009. Market Premises of Sustainable Certification, Detail Green, 1., English Edition, Institut fuer international architektur-dokumentation., Munich, Germany p. 72-73.