[en] PURPOSE: Introducing a hybrid imaging method such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT greatly alters the routine in the nuclear medicine department. It requires designing new workflow processes and the revision of original scheduling process and imaging protocols. In addition, the imaging protocol should be adapted for each individual patient, so that performing CT is fully justified and the CT procedure is fully tailored to address the clinical issue. Such refinements often occur before the procedure is started but may be required at some intermediate stage of the procedure. Furthermore, SPECT/CT leads in many instances to a new partnership with the radiology department. This article presents practical advice and highlights the key clinical elements which need to be considered to help understand the workflow process of SPECT/CT and optimise imaging protocols. METHODS: The workflow process using SPECT/CT is complex in particular because of its bimodal character, the large spectrum of stakeholders, the multiplicity of their activities at various time points and the need for real-time decision-making. RESULTS: With help from analytical tools developed for quality assessment, the workflow process using SPECT/CT may be separated into related, but independent steps, each with its specific human and material resources to use as inputs or outputs. This helps identify factors that could contribute to failure in routine clinical practice. At each step of the process, practical aspects to optimise imaging procedure and protocols are developed. A decision-making algorithm for justifying each CT indication as well as the appropriateness of each CT protocol is the cornerstone of routine clinical practice using SPECT/CT. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, implementing hybrid SPECT/CT imaging requires new ways of working. It is highly rewarding from a clinical perspective, but it also proves to be a daily challenge in terms of management.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Abikhzer G, Keidar Z. SPECT/CT and tumour imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2534-4.
Palmedo H, Marx C, Ebert A, Kreft B, Ko Y, Türler A, et al. Wholebody SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2532-6.
Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, Beer A, Krause BJ, Herrmann K, et al. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 2008;49(8):1305-19.
Bybel B, Brunken RC, Di Filippo FP, Neumann DR, Wu G, Cerqueira MD. SPECT/CT imaging: clinical utility of an emerging technology. Radiographics 2008;28(4):1097-113.
Brandon D, Alazraki A, Halkar RK, Alazraki NP. The role of singlephoton emission computed tomography and SPECT/computed tomography in oncologic imaging. Semin Oncol 2011;38(1):87-108.
EANM Physics Committee, Busemann Sokole E, Plachcínska A, Britten A, EANM Working Group on Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation Quality Control, Lyra Georgosopoulou M, et al. Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(3):662-71.
Leitha T, Staudenherz A. Hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging. In: Saba L, editor. Computed tomography-clinical applications. In Tech; 2012.
HAD. Démarche qualité en médecine nucléaire in vivo. Certification v2010 Guide méthodologique. 2013; Développement de la certification des établissements de santé: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013- 01/guide-medecine-nucleaire.pdf.
Tamm EP, Szklaruk J, Puthooran L, Stone D, Stevens BL, Modaro C. Quality initiatives: planning, setting up, and carrying out radiology process improvement projects. Radiographics 2012;32(5):1529-42.
Vijayanathan S, Butt S, Gnanasegaran G, Groves AM. Advantages and limitations of imaging the musculoskeletal system by conventional radiological, radionuclide, and hybrid modalities. Semin Nucl Med 2009;39(6):357-68.
Lavely WC, Goetze S, Friedman KP, Leal JP, Zhang Z, Garret-Mayer E, et al. Comparison of SPECT/CT, SPECT, and planar imaging with single- and dual-phase (99m) Tc-sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 2007;48(7):1084-9.
Mettler Jr. FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248(1):254-63.
Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(8):1882-9.
Iqbal B, Currie GM, Wheat JM, Raza H, Kiat H. The incremental value of SPECT/CT in characterizing solitary spine lesions. J Nucl Med Technol 2011;39(3):201-7.
Gnanasegaran G, Barwick T, Adamson K, Mohan H, Sharp D, Fogelman I. Multislice SPECT/CT in benign and malignant bone disease: when the ordinary turns into the extraordinary. Semin Nucl Med 2009;39(6):431-42.
Beyer T, Tellmann L, Nickel I, Pietrzyk U. On the use of positioning aids to reduce misregistration in the head and neck in whole-body PET/CT studies. J Nucl Med 2005;46(4):596-602.
Wieder H, Freudenberg LS, Czernin J, Navar BN, Israel O, Beyer T. Variations of clinical SPECT/CT operations: an international survey. Nuklearmedizin 2012;51(4):154-60.
Livieratos L. Technical challenges and pitfalls in hybrid imaging. In: Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G, van der Wall H, editors. Radionuclide and hybrid bone imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 361-8. ISBN 978-3-642-02399-6.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.