[en] The current intensive system of pig production is the outcome of better control of the environment, prevention of infectious disease, a feeding strategy adapted to the nutritional needs of pigs, and genetic selection oriented towards increased growth and reproductive performances. Meanwhile, certain practices have been shown to be detrimental to pig welfare. During the last few decades, research conducted on pig welfare has mainly been oriented towards measurement of behavioural and physiological responses to housing, feeding and management practices. The results have demonstrated the animals' difficulties to adapt to their conditions, particularly regarding changes in social relationships, impoverishment of the environment, restriction of space, and the development of management practices leading to discomfort, fear or pain. This review presents a summary of the scientific research conducted on the consequences of husbandry conditions and management practices on pig welfare. Finally, some possible solutions are presented for improving pig welfare by providing greater harmony between the animals and their environment.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Meunier-Salaun, Marie-Claude
Bizeray, D.
Colson, V.
Courboulay, V.
Lensink, J.
Prunier, A.
Remience, Virginie
Vandenheede, Marc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de productions animales > Ethologie vétérinaire et bien-être des animaux
Arey D.S., 1997. Behavioural observations of peri-parturient sows and the development of alternative farrowing accommodation: a review. Anim. Welf., 6, 217-229.
Barnett J.H., Hemsworth P.H., Cronin G.M., Jongman E.C., Hutson G.D., 2001. A review of welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 52, 1-28.
Beattie V.E., Walker N., Sneddon I.A., 1996. An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 48, 151-158.
Bergeron R., Bolduc J., Ramonet Y., Meunier-Salaün M.C., Robert S., 2000. Feeding motivation and stereotypies in pregnant sows fed increasing levels of fibre and/or food. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 70, 27-40.
Bergeron R., Meunier-Salaün M.C., Robert S., 2002. Effects of food texture on meal duration and behaviour of sows fed high fibre or concentrate diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 587-589.
Boe K., 1991. The process of weaning in pigs: when the sow decides. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 30, 47-59.
Bonde M., Rousing T., Badsberg J.H., Sorensen J.T., 2004. Associations between lying-down behaviour problems and body condition, limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commercial sow herds. Liv. Prod. Sci., 87, 179-187.
Bonneau M., Bidanel J.P., 1998. Dossier : l'augmentation de la prolificité des truies : acquis, progrès envisageables et conséquences. INRA Prod. Anim., 11, 211-256.
Boyle L.A., Leonard F.C., Lynch P.B., Brophy P., 2002. Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 76, 119-134.
Bresser H.P.M., de Bracke J.H.A., Engel B., Noordhuizen J.P., 1993. Feeding order of sows at an individual electronic feed station in a dynamic group-housing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 36, 123-134.
Brouns F., Edwards S.A., English P.R., 1995. Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 54, 301-313.
Colson V., Orgeur P., Foury A., Mormède P., 2006. Consequences of weaning at 21 and 28 days on growth, behaviour and hormonal responses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98, 70-88.
Courboulay V., 2004. Comment l'apport d'objets manipulables en hauteur et au sol influence-t-il l'activité des porcs charcutiers logés sur caillebotis intégral ? Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 36, 389-394.
Courboulay V., 2005a. Conséquences d'une augmentation de la surface par animal sur les performances, les lésions et le comportement du porc à l'engrais. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 37, 465-470.
Courboulay V., 2005b. Quel type d'objet à fournir aux porcs en engraissement ? Techniporc, 28, 9-13.
Courboulay V., Dubois A., Meunier-Salaün M.C., 2001. La distribution d'aliment riche en fibre affecte l'activité alimentaire des truies gestantes logées en groupe. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 33, 307-312.
Cronin G.M., Smith J.A., Hodge F.M., Hemsworth P.H., 1994. The behaviour of primiparous sows around farrowing in reponse to restraint and straw bedding. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 39, 269-280.
Damm B.I., Lisborg L., Vestergaard K.S., Vanicek J., 2003. Nest-building, behavioural disturbances and heart rate in farrowing sows kept in crates and Schmid pens. Liv. Prod. Sci., 80, 175-187.
Dourmad J.Y., Etienne M., Noblet J., 1996. Reconstitution of body reserves in multiparous sows during pregnancy: effect of energy intake during pregnancy and mobilisation during the previous lactation. J. Anim. Sci., 74, 2211-2219.
Ducreux E., Aloui B., Robin P., Dourmad J.Y., Courboulay V., Meunier-Salaün M.C., 2002. Les porcs affichent leurs préfé rences vis-à-vis du type de sol en fonction de la température ambiante. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 34, 211-217.
Dunshea F.R., Kerton D.K. Cranwell P.D., Campbell R.G., Mullan B.P., King R.H., Power G.N., Pluske J.R., 2003. Lifetime and post-weaning determinants of performance indices of pigs. Aust. J. Agricult. Res., 54, 363-370.
Durrell J.L., Sneddon I.A., Beattie V.E., Kilpatrick D.J., 2002. Sow behaviour and welfare in voluntary cubicle pens (small static groups) and split-yard systems (large dynamic groups). Anim. Sci. 75, 67-74.
Durrell J.L., Beattie V.E., Sneddon I.A., Kilpatrick D., 2003. Pre-mixing as a technique for facilitating subgroup formation and reducing sow aggression in large dynamic groups. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84, 89-99.
De Leeuw J.A., Ekkel E.D., 2004. Effects of feeding level and the presence of a foraging substrate on the behaviour and stress physiological response of individually housed gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 86, 15-25.
Edwards S.A., 2002. Perinatal mortality in the pig: environmental or physiological solutions? Liv. Prod. Sci., 78, 3-12.
EFSA-AHAW panel, 2005. The welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effects of different space allowances and floor type. EFSA-Q-2004-077. Annex to the EFSA J., 268, 1-19.
European Council Directive 1991/630/EC, 1991. Minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 340, 11.12.1991, 33.
European Council Directive 2001/88/EC, 2001. Minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 316, 11.12.2001, 1.
European Council Directive 2001/93/EC, 2001. Minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 316, 1.12.2001, 36.
Gallois M., Le Cozler Y., Prunier A., 2005. Tooth resection in piglets, influence on welfare and performance. Prev. Vet. Med., 69, 13-23.
Gonyou H.W., Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L., 1986. Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 16, 269-278.
Haskell M.J., Hutson G.D., 1996. The prefarrowing behaviour of sows with access to straw and space for locomotion. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 49, 375-387.
Hay M., Vulin A., Génin S. Sales P., Prunier A., 2003. Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets : behavioural and physiological responses over the subsequent five days. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 82, 201-218.
Hay M., Rue J., Sansac C., Brunel G., Prunier A., 2004. Long term detrimental effects of tooth clipping or grinding in piglets: histological approach. Anim. Welf., 13, 27-32.
Herskin M.S., Jensen K.H., Thodberg K., 1998. Influence of environmental stimuli on maternal behaviour related to bonding, reactivity and crushing of piglets in domestic sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 58, 241-254.
Huet F.R., Rousseau P., Salaün Y., 2003. Bâtiments d́levage porcin et environnement. Analyse de l'enquête du 1 er novembre 2001 réalisée par le Service central des Enquêtes et Etudes Statistiques (SCEES). Rapport d́tude ITP/ OFIVAL, 140p.
Hunter E.J., Broom D.M., Edwards S.A., Sibly R.M., 1988. Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer-controlled feeder. Anim. Prod., 47, 139-148.
Hutter, S., K. Heinritzi, E. Reich, W. Ehret. 1994. Efficacité de différentes méthodes de résection des dents chez le porcelet non sevré. Rev. Méd. Vét., 145, 205-213.
Janczak A.M., Pedersen L.J., Rydhmer L., Bakken M., 2003. Relation between early fear-and anxiety-related behaviour and maternal ability in sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 82, 121-135.
Jarvis S., Van der Vegt B.J., Lawrence A.B., Mc Lean K.A., Deans L.A., Chirnside J., Calvert S.K., 2001. The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 71, 203-216.
Jensen P., 1993. Nest building in domestic sows: the role of external stimuli. Anim. Behav., 45, 351-358.
Jensen K.H., Pedersen B.K., Pedersen L.J., Jorgensen E., 1995. Well-being in pregnant sows: confinement versus group housing with electronic sow feeding. Acta Agric. Scand., Section A. Animal Science, 45, 266-275.
Jensen K.H., Sorensen L.S., Bertelsen D., Pedersen A.R., Jorgensen E., Nielsen N.P., Vestergaard K., 2000. Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group-housing systems with electronic sow feeding: a field trial. Anim. Sci., 71, 535-545.
Krause M., Van't Klooster C.E., Buré R.G., Metz J.H.M., Sambraus, H.H., 1997. The influence of sequential and simultaneous feeding and the availability of straw on the behaviour of gilts in group housing. Netherl. J. Agric. Sci., 45, 33-48.
Lawrence A.B., Rushen, J, 1993. Stereotypic animal behaviour. CAB international (Ed), Wallingford, UK, 212p.
Le Cozler Y., Pichodo X., Roy H., Guyomarc'h C., Quiniou N., Louveau I., Lebret B., Lefaucheur L., Gondret F., 2004. Influence du poids et de la taille de la portée à la naissance sur la survie du porcelet, ses performances de croissance, d'abattage et la qualité de la viande. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 36, 443-450.
Le Dividich J., Tivey D., Aumaître A., 1998. Gastro-intestinal development and digestive capacity in young pig. In: Done, S., Thomson, J., Varley, M., Proc.15th. Int. Pig Vet. Soc. Cong., Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, 299-308.
Le Dividich J., Le Cozler Y., Landrain B., Derrien R., 2003. L'hyperproloficité vue du côté du porcelet. In : L'hyperprolificité au quotidien : intérêts et limites. Chambres d'agriculture, EDE Bretagne, Rennes. 7ème Journ. Régionale Porc, Loudéac, France, 03 décembre 2003, 15-17.
Lovendahl P., Holm Damgaard L., Lindstrom Nielsen B., Thodberg K., Su G., Rydhmer L., 2005. Aggressive behaviour of sows at mixing and maternal behaviour are heritable and genetically correlated traits. Liv. Prod. Sci., 93, 73-85.
McLean, K.A., Lawrence, A.B., Petherick, J.C., Deans, L., Chirnside, J., Vaughan, A., Nielsen, B.L., Webb, R., 1998. Investigation of the relationship between farrowing environment, sex steroid concentrations and maternal aggression in gilts. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 50, 95-109.
Madec F., Bridoux N., Bounaix S., Gestin A., 1998. Measurement of digestive disorders in the piglet at weaning and related risk factors. Prev. Vet. Med., 35, 53-72.
Meunier-Salaün M.C., Dantzer R., 1990. Behaviour-environment relationships in pigs: importance for the design of housing and management systems in intensive husbandry. Pig News Inf., 11, 507-514.
Meunier-Salaün M.C., Edwards S., Robert S., 2001. Effect of fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted fed sow. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 90, 53-69.
Meunier-Salaün, M.C., Courboulay, V., Père, M.C., Pol, F., Quesnel, H., 2002. Élevage des truies en groupe : acquis et perspective de recherches. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr. 34, 239-247.
Odberg F.O., 1978. Abnormal behaviors: stereotypies. Proc. 1st World Cong. Ethol. Appl. Zootechn., Industrias Graficas Espana (Ed), Madrid, Espagne, 475-480.
Orgeur P., Hay M., Mormède P., Salmon H., Le Dividich J., Nowak R., Schaal B., Lévy F., 2001. Behavioural, growth and immune consequences of early weaning in one-week-old Large-White piglets. Reprod. Nut. Dev., 41, 321-332.
Orgeur P., Le Dividich J., Colson V., Meunier-Salaün M.C., 2002. La relation mère-jeune chez les porcins : de la naissance au sevrage. INRA Prod. Anim., 15, 185-198.
Petherick J.C., 1983. Abiological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. In : Farm Animal housing and Welfare, Baxter S.H.,, Baxter M.R., Mc Cormack J.A.C. (Eds), The Hague Martinus Nijhoff, 103-120.
Prunier A., Hay M., Servière J., 2002. Evaluation et prévention de la douleur induite par les interventions de convenance chez le porcelet. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 34, 257-268.
Prunier A., Mounier A., Hay M., 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 83, 216-222.
Prunier A., Bonneau M., 2006. Quelles alternatives à la castration des porcelets ? Journ Rech. Porcine Fr., 38, 427-436.
Rhodes R.T., Appleby M.C., Chinn K., Douglas L., Houpt K.A., Irwin C., McGlone J.J., Sundberg P., Tokach L., Wills R.W., 2005. A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 227, 1580-1590.
Robert S., Martineau G.P., 2001. Effects of repeated cross-fosterings on preweaning behavior and growth performance of piglets and on maternal behavior of sows. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 88-93.
Robert S., Bergeron R., Farmer C., Meunier-Salaün M.C., 2002. Does the number of daily meals affects feeding motivation and behaviour of gilts fed high-fibre diets ? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 76, 105-117.
Rydhmer L., Grandinson K., Janczak A.M., Lund M.S., Thodberg K., Vangen O., Valros A., 2003. Bilan du projet des pays de l'Europe du Nord sur l'étude du comportement maternel des truies. Journ. Rech. Porcine Fr., 35, 301-308.
Simonsen H. B., Klinken L., Bindseil E., 1991. Histopathology of intact and docked pig tails. Brit. Vet. J., 147, 407-412.
SVC, 1997. The Welfare of intensively kept pigs. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee of European Council 9762/04. Report XXIV/ScVC/0005/1997, Brussels, Belgium, 190p.
Spoolder H.A.M., Burbidge J.A., Edwards S.A., Lawrence A.B, Simmins P.H., 1997. Effects of food level on performance and behaviour of sows in a dynamic group-housing system with electronic feeding. Anim. Sci., 65, 473-482.
Tanida, H., Miura, A., Tanaka, T., Yoshimoto, T., 1995. Behavioural response to humans in individually handled weanling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 42, 249-259.
Tuyttens F.A., 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 92, 262-282.
Van de Weerd H.A., Docking C.M., Day J.E.L., Avery P.J., Edwards S.A., 2003. A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84, 101-118.
Vieuille C., Berger F., Le Pape G., Bellanger D, 2003. Sow behaviour involved in the crushing of piglets in outdoor farrowing huts-a brief report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 80, 109-115.
Weng R.C., Edwards S.A., English P.R., 1998. Behaviour, social interactions and lesion score of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 59, 307- 316.
Widowski T.M., Curtis E.C., 1990. The influence of straw, cloth tassel, or both on the prepartum behaviour of sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 27, 53-7
