Article (Scientific journals)
Comparative prospective, double-blind, multicenter study of the efficacy of tiludronate and etidronate in the treatment of Paget's disease of bone.
Roux, C.; Gennari, C.; Farrerons, J. et al.
1995In Arthritis and Rheumatism, 38 (6), p. 851-8
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Comparative prospective, double-blind, multicenter study of the efficacy of tiludronate.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.36 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alkaline Phosphatase/blood; Diphosphonates/standards/therapeutic use; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Etidronic Acid/standards/therapeutic use; Female; Humans; Hydroxyproline/urine; Male; Middle Aged; Osteitis Deformans/blood/drug therapy; Prospective Studies; Time Factors
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of tiludronate and etidronate at the same dosage (400 mg/day) for the treatment of active Paget's disease of bone. METHODS: We studied 234 patients with radiologic lesions characteristic of Paget's disease of bone and serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) concentrations at least twice the upper limit of normal, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial lasting 6 months. Patients were randomly allocated into 1 of 3 treatment groups: tiludronate for 3 months followed by placebo for 3 months, tiludronate for 6 months, or etidronate for 6 months. Serum AP levels and urinary hydroxyproline excretion were measured at baseline and after 3 months and 6 months. Patients with a reduction of at least 50% in the serum AP concentration were considered to be responders. RESULTS: After 3 months, the proportion of responders was higher in the tiludronate group (57.4%) than in the etidronate group (13.9%) (P < 0.0001). In the etidronate group, this percentage was lower among patients who had received previous treatment with a bisphosphonate (2.3%) than among those who had not (28.6%) (P < 0.01). Previous bisphosphonate treatment was not associated with response in the tiludronate group. After 6 months, the proportion of responders did not differ between the 2 tiludronate groups (60.3% and 70.1%), but was lower in the etidronate group (25.3%) (P < 0.0001). There was a higher proportion of patients with treatment-resistant disease (< 25% reduction of serum AP) in the etidronate group (51.9%) than in the tiludronate 3-month group (17.9%) or the tiludronate 6-month group (19.5%) (P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal disturbances were more common, and occurred earlier, with tiludronate, but they were mostly mild, requiring no treatment. CONCLUSION: Tiludronate at 400 mg/day for 3 months or 6 months is more effective than the same dosage of etidronate for 6 months in the treatment of Paget's disease.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Roux, C.
Gennari, C.
Farrerons, J.
Devogelaer, J. P.
Mulder, H.
Kruse, H. P.
Picot, C.
Titeux, L.
REGINSTER, Jean-Yves  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Dougados, M.
Language :
English
Title :
Comparative prospective, double-blind, multicenter study of the efficacy of tiludronate and etidronate in the treatment of Paget's disease of bone.
Publication date :
1995
Journal title :
Arthritis and Rheumatism
ISSN :
0004-3591
eISSN :
1529-0131
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States - New York
Volume :
38
Issue :
6
Pages :
851-8
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 07 August 2013

Statistics


Number of views
63 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
127
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
113
OpenCitations
 
89

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi