This is the author’s postprint version of : Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J.-L., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2014). A quest for meta-learning gains in a physics serious game. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 361-374.
Verpoorten, Dominique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut de Formation et de Recherche en Enseignement Supérieur (IFRES) > Pédagogie de l'Enseignement supérieur
Castaigne, J.-L.; École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Lyon, 3 rue Maurice-Audin, BP 170, Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, 69512, France
Westera, W.; CELSTEC, Open University in the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, Heerlen, 6411AT, Netherlands
Specht, M.; CELSTEC, Open University in the Netherlands, Valkenburgerweg 177, Heerlen, 6411AT, Netherlands
Language :
English
Title :
A quest for meta-learning gains in a physics serious game
Alternative titles :
[fr] Dans un jeu sérieux, une quête de gains méta-cognitifs
Publication date :
01 June 2014
Journal title :
Education and Information Technologies
ISSN :
1360-2357
Publisher :
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
Volume :
19
Issue :
2
Pages :
361-374
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
FP6
Commentary :
Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J.-L., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2014). A quest for meta-learning gains in a physics serious game. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 361-374.
Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognitionin second language teachingand learning. ERIC Digest: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 359-375.
Bopp, M. (2006). Didactic analysis of digital games and game-based learning. In M. Pivec (Ed.), Affective and emotional aspects of human-computer interaction. Game-based and innovative learning approaches (pp. 8-37). Amsterdam: Ios Press.
Brown, T. A., & Shuford, E. H. (1973). Quantifying uncertainty into numericalprobabilities for the reportingof intelligence. Number No. R-1185-ARPA.
Castaigne, J.-L. (2007). Game based learning and metacognition: working with quantitative metacognitive feed-back based on subjective probability without loosing the game play. Paper presented at the 12th biennial Conference EARLI: Developing Potentials for Learning. http://earli2007. hu/nq/home/scientific_program/programme/proposal_view/&abstractid=1757.
Chi, M., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
Claxton, G. (2006). Expanding the capacity tolearn: A new endfor education? Keynote speech given at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, 6-9 September 2005.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
De Finetti, B. (1965). Methods for discriminating levels of partial knowledge concerning a test item. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 87-123.
De Finetti, B. (1970). Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability. Acta Psychologica, 34(2-3), 129-145.
De Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Bristol: JISC.
Duell, O. K. (1986). Metacognitive skills. In G. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking and problem solving (pp. 205-239). Orlando: Academic.
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2011). What Makes a Good Learning Game? - Going beyond edutainment. http://elearnmag. acm. org/archive. cfm?aid=1943210.
European Commission. (2006). Proposal for a recommendationof the European Parliamentand of the Councilon key competences forlifelong learning. COM(2005)548 final. Brussels.
Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 324-340.
Gardner-Medwin, T. (1995). Confidence assessment in the teaching of basic science. ALT-J (Association for Learning Technology Journal), 3, 80-85.
Gardner-Medwin, T. (1998). Updating with confidence: Do your students know what they don't know? Health Informatics, 4, 45-46.
Gardner-Medwin, T., & Curtin, N. (2007, May). Certainty-Based Marking (CBM) ForReflective Learning And ProperKnowledge Assessment. Paper presented at the REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility.
Glahn, C., Specht, M., & Koper, R. (2007). Smart indicators on learning interactions. In E. Duval, R. Klamma, & M. Wolpers (Eds.), EC-TEL 2007 LNCS 4753 (pp. 56-70). Berlin: Springer.
Harteveld, C., Guimarães, R., Mayer, I., & Bidarra, R. (2007). Balancing pedagogy, game andreality components within aunique serious game fortraininglevee inspection. Paper presented at the Second International Conference, Edutainment 2007.
Hunt, D. (1993). Human self-assessment: Theory and application to learning and testing. In D. Leclercq & J. Bruno (Eds.), Item banking: Interactive testing and self-assessment, Vol. F 112 (pp. 177-189). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Jackson, N. (2004). Developing the concept of metalearning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 391-403.
Jans, V., & Leclercq, D. (1999). Mesurer l'effet de l'apprentissage a l'aide de l'analyse spectrale des performances. In C. Depover & B. Noel (Eds.), Evaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs (pp. 303-317). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Kiili, K. (2004). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24.
Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers in Education, 52(4), 800-810.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Leclercq, D. (1982). Confidence Marking: its use in testing. In Postlethwaite & Choppin (Eds.), Evaluation in education, Vol. 6-2 (pp. 161-287). Pergamon: Oxford.
Leclercq, D., & Poumay, M. (2005). The 8 Learning Events Model. Release 2005. 1. Retrieved from http://www. labset. net/media/prod/8LEM. pdf.
Mac Farlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educationaluse of games. Anexploration by TEEM ofthe contribution which gamescan make to theeducation process. Cambridge: Department for Education and Skills - TEEM project.
Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010). Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 241-265.
Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning. A review of literature. UK: Learning and skills development agency.
Moser, R. (2000). A methodology for thedesign of educational computeradventure games. http://www. library. unsw. edu. au/~thesis/adt-NUN/public/adt-NUN20021003. 141152.
Moss, C. (2002). Finding Balance: The vices of our "versus". First Monday, 7(1).
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why Investigate Metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Petit, L., Castaigne, J.-L., & Verpoorten, D. (2007). Checking the internal pedagogical consistency of a game learning situation: the Leclercq's triple consistency triangle. Paper presented at the Evete Conference 2007, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Piaget, J. (1978). Success and understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Quinn, C. (2005). Engaging learning-Designing e-Learning simulation games. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for asuccessful life and awell-functioning society. Hogrefe Publishing. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
Saldaña, D. (2004). Dynamic master mind. School Psychology International, 25(4), 422-438.
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114-121.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113-125.
Veenman, M., van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.
Verpoorten, D., Poumay, M., & Leclercq, D. (2007). The 8 Learning Events Model: a pedagogic conceptual tool supporting diversification of learning methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(2), 151-160.
Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2011). Reflection Amplifiers in Online Courses: A Classification Framework. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(2), 167-190.
Verpoorten, D., Glahn, C., Chatti, A., Westera, W., & Specht, M. (2011). Self-Reported Learning Effects of a Tagging Activity Carried out in a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) by Secondary-School Pupils. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 2(1), 276-284.
Westera, W., Nadolski, R. J., Hummel, H. G. K., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2008). Serious games for higher education: a framework for reducing design complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 420-432.