Sebestyén et al. - 2011 - Conkiss conformal kidneys sparing 3D noncoplanar radiotherapy treatment for pancreatic cancer as an alternative to IMRT. - Med Dos.pdf
[en] When treating pancreatic cancer using standard (ST) 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) beam arrangements, the kidneys often receive a higher dose than their probable tolerance limit. Our aim was to elaborate a new planning method that--similarly to IMRT--effectively spares the kidneys without compromising the target coverage. Conformal kidneys sparing (CONKISS) 5-field, noncoplanar plans were compared with ST plans for 23 consecutive patients retrospectively. Optimal beam arrangements were used consisting of a left- and right-wedged beam-pair and an anteroposterior beam inclined in the caudal direction. The wedge direction determination (WEDDE) algorithm was developed to adjust the adequate direction of wedges. The aimed organs at risk (OARs) mean dose limits were: kidney <12 Gy, liver <25 Gy, small bowels <30 Gy, and spinal cord maximum <45 Gy. Conformity and homogeneity indexes with z-test were used to evaluate and compare the different planning approaches. The mean dose to the kidneys decreased significantly (p < 0.05): left kidney 7.7 vs. 10.7 Gy, right kidney 9.1 vs. 11.7 Gy. Meanwhile the mean dose to the liver increased significantly (18.1 vs. 15.0 Gy). The changes in the conformity, homogeneity, and in the doses to other OARs were not significant. The CONKISS method balances the load among the OARs and significantly reduces the dose to the kidneys, without any significant change in the conformity and homogeneity. Using 3D-CRT the CONKISS method can be a smart alternative to IMRT to enhance the possibility of dose escalation.
Disciplines :
Radiology, nuclear medicine & imaging
Author, co-author :
Sebestyen, Zsolt
Kovacs, Peter
GULYBAN, Akos ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
Farkas, Robert
Bellyei, Szabolcs
Liposits, Gabor
Szigeti, Andras
Esik, Olga
Derczy, Katalin
Mangel, Laszlo
Language :
English
Title :
Conkiss: conformal kidneys sparing 3D noncoplanar radiotherapy treatment for pancreatic cancer as an alternative to IMRT.
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
Medical Dosimetry
ISSN :
0958-3947
eISSN :
1873-4022
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
36
Issue :
1
Pages :
35-40
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2011 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Brade A., Brierley J., Oza A., et al. Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy with and without neoadjuvant gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 67:1027-1036.
Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA. Cancer. J. Clin 2008, 58:71-96.
Ko A.H., Quivey J.M., Venook A.P., et al. A phase II study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus low-dose cisplatin followed by consolidative chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 68:809-816.
Keene K.S., Rich T.A., Penberthy D.R., et al. Clinical experience with chronomodulated infusional 5-fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2005, 62:97-103.
Murphy J.D., Adusumilli S., Griffith K.A., et al. Full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 68:801-808.
Ben-Josef E., Shields A.F., Vaishampayan U., et al. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 59:454-459.
Spry N., Harvey J., MacLeod C., et al. 3D Radiotherapy can be safely combined with sandwich systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy in the management of pancreatic cancer: Actors influencing outcome. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008, 70:1438-1446.
Dobbs J., Barrett A., Ash D. Practical radiotherapy planning 1999, 247-252. Arnold and Oxford University Press, Bristol. 3rd ed.
Brown M.W., Ning H., Arora B., et al. A dosimetric analysis of dose escalation using two intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2006, 65:274-283.
Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Report 50 1993, ICRU, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD.
Prescribing and reporting photon beam therapy. Report 62 1999, ICRU, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Washington D.C.
Wilkowski R., Thoma M., Weingandt H., et al. Chemoradiation for ductal pancreatic carcinoma: Principles of combining chemotherapy with radiation, definition of target volume and radiation dose [review]. JOP 2005, 6:216-230.
Dawson L.A., Ten Haken R.K., Lawrence T.S. Partial irradiation of the liver [abstract]. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2001, 11:240-246.
Gulyban A. Kovács P., Sebestyén Z., et al. Multisegmented tangential breast fields: A rational way to treat breast cancer. Strahlenther. Oncol. 2008, 184:262-269.
Van't Riet A., Mak A.C., Moerland M.A., et al. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformity in brachytherapy and external irradiation: Application to the prostate. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1997, 37:731-736.
Feuvret L., Noel G., Mazeron J.J., et al. Conformity index: A review. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2006, 64:333-342.
Van Asselen B., Raaijmakers C.P.J., Hofman P., et al. An improved breast irradiation technique using three-dimensional geometrical information and intensity modulation. Radiother. Oncol. 2001, 58:341-347.
Hsiung-Stripp D.C., McDonough J., Masters H.M., et al. Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in pancreatic cancer. Med. Dosim 2001, 26:255-259.
Menhel J., Levin D., Alezra D., et al. Assessing the quality of conformal treatment planning: A new tool for quantitative comparison. Phys. Med. Biol 2006, 51:5363-5375.
Lomax N.J., Scheib S.G. Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003, 55:1409-1419.
Weber D.C., Trofimov A.V., Delaney T.F., et al. A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58:1596-1606.
Higgins P.D., Sohn J.W., Fine R.M., et al. Three-dimensional conformal pancreas treatment: Comparison of four- to six-field techniques [abstract]. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1995, 31:605-609.
Osborne C., Bydder S.A., Ebert M.A., et al. Comparison of non-coplanar and coplanar techniques to treat cancer of the pancreas. Australas. Radiol 2006, 50:463-467.
Bussels B., Goethals L., Feron M., et al. Respiration-induced movement of the upper abdominal organs: A pitfall for the three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment of pancreatic cancer. Radiother. Oncol 2003, 68:69-74.
Gierga D.P., Chen G.T.Y., Kung J.H., et al. Quantification of respiration-induced abdominal tumor motion and its impact on IMRT dose distributions. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58:1584-1595.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.