Article (Scientific journals)
Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults.
Finfer, Simon; Wernerman, Jan; PREISER, Jean-Charles et al.
2013In Critical Care, 17 (3), p. 229
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Consensus reco 2012 CC.pdf
Publisher postprint (518.54 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] The management reporting and assessment of glycemic control lacks standardization. The use of different methods to measure the blood glucose concentration and to report the performance of insulin treatment yields major disparities and complicates the interpretation and comparison of clinical trials. We convened a meeting of 16 experts plus invited observers from industry to discuss and where possible reach consensus on the most appropriate methods to measure and monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients and on how glycemic control should be assessed and reported. Where consensus could not be reached, recommendations on further research and data needed to reach consensus in the future were suggested. Recognizing their clear conflict of interest, industry observers played no role in developing the consensus or recommendations from the meeting. Consensus recommendations were agreed for the measurement and reporting of glycemic control in clinical trials and for the measurement of blood glucose in clinical practice. Recommendations covered the following areas: How should we measure and report glucose control when intermittent blood glucose measurements are used? What are the appropriate performance standards for intermittent blood glucose monitors in the ICU? Continuous or automated intermittent glucose monitoring - methods and technology: can we use the same measures for assessment of glucose control with continuous and intermittent monitoring? What is acceptable performance for continuous glucose monitoring systems? If implemented, these recommendations have the potential to minimize the discrepancies in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials and to improve glucose control in clinical practice. Furthermore, to be fit for use, glucose meters and continuous monitoring systems must match their performance to fit the needs of patients and clinicians in the intensive care setting.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Finfer, Simon
Wernerman, Jan
PREISER, Jean-Charles 
Cass, Tony
Desaive, Thomas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles
Hovorka, Roman
Joseph, Jeffrey I.
Kosiborod, Mikhail
Krinsley, James
Mackenzie, Iain
Mesotten, Dieter
Schultz, Marcus J.
Scott, Mitchell G.
Slingerland, Robbert
Van den Berghe, Greet
Van Herpe, Tom
More authors (6 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults.
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
Critical Care
ISSN :
1364-8535
eISSN :
1466-609X
Publisher :
BioMed Central, London, United Kingdom
Volume :
17
Issue :
3
Pages :
229
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 19 June 2013

Statistics


Number of views
131 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
223 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
153
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
105
OpenCitations
 
140

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi