Article (Scientific journals)
The ocean bomb radiocarbon inventory revisited
Mouchet, Anne
2013In Radiocarbon, 55 (2-3), p. 1580-1594
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
ArticleFinal.pdf
Author preprint (357.91 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Radiocarbon; Ocean; Tracer
Abstract :
[en] Large discrepancies exist among data-based estimates and model reconstructions of the ocean bomb radiocarbon inventory. In order to resolve this gap, it has been proposed that the CO2 piston veloc- ity should be revised downward (Sweeney et al., 2007; Müller et al., 2008). Here we compare the transient 14C distributions in the ocean obtained with different formulations of the isotopic ratio commonly used in modeling studies. It is found that both the CO2 increase and the air-sea CO2 flux significantly contribute to the 1990 ocean bomb radiocarbon inventory, by around 10% each. Moreover, these two processes explain more than 25% of the inventory difference be- tween 1974 and 1990. These results imply that, as already argued by Naegler (2009), inventories based on observations which lack infor- mation about CO2 invasion are underestimated. Further, this work allows to gain insight into the reasons for discrepancies among model results. It suggests that while a comprehensive isotopic formulation is needed when addressing the global radiocarbon cycle, a simplified form is more relevant for model calibration and piston velocity assess- ment based on currently available bomb radiocarbon inventories.
Disciplines :
Earth sciences & physical geography
Author, co-author :
Mouchet, Anne ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Labo de physique atmosphérique et planétaire (LPAP)
Language :
English
Title :
The ocean bomb radiocarbon inventory revisited
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
Radiocarbon
ISSN :
0033-8222
Publisher :
University of Arizona, United States - Arizona
Volume :
55
Issue :
2-3
Pages :
1580-1594
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 17 April 2013

Statistics


Number of views
84 (10 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
2 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
11
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
7
OpenCitations
 
2

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi