[fr] Introduction : Nous avons analysé les raisons ayant conduit les individus à se faire ou non vacciner contre la grippe AH1N1, en France et en Belgique.
Méthodes : Des entretiens individuels semi-dirigés ont été réalisés, enregistrés et retranscrits pour analyse. Cinquante-huit entretiens ont été réalisés avec des patients habitant en France, dans la région Midi-Pyrénées (21 entretiens), et en Belgique, dans la province de Liège (37 entretiens). Les patients ont été recrutés par des médecins généralistes. Cet échantillon de patients comprenait des personnes qui avaient été vaccinées contre la grippe AH1N1, et d’autres qui ne l’avaient pas été.
Résultats : Cinq critères ont influencé la décision de la vaccination : la représentation de la réalité de l’épidémie et de sa dangerosité ; la représentation du vaccin contre la grippe AH1N1 (et de son innocuité) ; les croyances et représentations concernant la vaccination ; l’influence du point de vue des professionnels de santé ; et les discussions avec l’entourage et la recherche personnelle d’informations.
Conclusion : Ces éléments peuvent aussi être vus comme les critères influençant la décision de la vaccination de manière plus générale. Ils reflètent la subjectivité du patient, sa perception de la vaccination. L’investigation de ces dimensions chez le patient peut aider le médecin à améliorer la compliance de ses patients récalcitrants concernant une vaccination. En identifiant les freins et les idées reçues, il peut les corriger et amener le patient à accepter la vaccination. [en] This article presents a qualitative analysis of the reasons evoked by the patients to decide or not to be vaccinated against AH1N1 influenza, in France and Belgium.
58 interviews were performed with patient living in the region of Midi Pyrénées, France (21 interviews) and in the province of Liège, Belgium (37 interviews). Within the sample, some patients were vaccinated against AH1N1 influenza and others were not.
The analysis highlights five criteria that influenced the decision to be vaccinated or not. First it is how people understand the epidemic and the threats it represents. Then came their representation about the vaccine (and its harmlessness) and their beliefs. The influence of the health professionals’ opinion and the discussion between the patient and his acquaintances were the last two criteria.
These elements can be considered as criteria influencing the decision about any vaccination. They reflect the patient’s subjectivity, the patient’s perception of vaccination. Investigating these dimensions in the patient’s mind can help the practitioner to positively influence the reluctant patients. Identifying threats and received ideas should allow the doctor to correct them and accept vaccination.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Ketterer, Frédéric ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
Goffin, Yves
Boyer, Pierre; Université Toulouse 3 > Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale
Freyens, Anne; Université Toulouse 3 > Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale
Sourbes, Adeline
Belche, Jean Luc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Vaus S., Van Cauteren D., Guthmann J.P., Le Strat Y., Vaillant V., de Valk H., et al. Influenza vaccination coverage against seasonal and pandemic influenza and their determinants in France: a cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:30.
Canova L., Birchmeier M., D'Acemont V., Abetel G., Favrat B., Landry P., et al. Prevalence rate and reasons for refusals of influenza vaccine in the elderly. SMW 2003, 133:598-602.
Keenan H., Campbell J., Evans P. Influenza vaccination in patients with asthma: why is the uptake so low?. Br J Gen Pract 2007, 57:359-367.
Evans M.R., Prout H., Prior L., Tapper-Jones L.M., Butler C.C. A qualitative study of lay beliefs about influenza immunization in older people. Br J Pract 2007, 57:352-358.
Ward L., Draper J. A review of the factors involved in older people's decision making with regard of influenza vaccination: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17:5-16.
Telford R., Rogers A. What influences elderly peoples' decisions about whether to accept the influenza vaccination? A qualitative study. Health Educ Res Theory Pract 2003, 3(6):743-753.
Schwarzinger M., Flicoteaux R., Cortarenoda S., Obadia Y., Moatti J.P. Low acceptability of A/H1N1 pandemic vaccination in French adult population: did public health policy fuel public dissonance?. PloS One 2010, 5(4):1-9.
SteelFisher G.K., Blendon R.J., Bekheit M.M., Lubell K. The public's response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. NEJM 2010, 65:1-6.
Eastwood K., Durrheim D.N., Jones A., Butler M. Acceptance of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination by Australian public. MJA 2010, 192(1):33-36.
Seale H., Heywood A., McLaws M.L., Ward K.F., Lowbridge C.P., Van D., et al. Why do I need it? I'm not at risk! Public perception towards the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine. BMC Infect Dis 2010, 10:99.
Sourbes A, Croyances et motivations des patients prioritaires et/ou à risque ayant guidé leur choix de vaccination contre la grippe AH1N1 (2009) : recherche qualitative. Thèse pour l'obtention du diplôme de docteur en médecine - qualification médecine générale - présentée et soutenue publiquement le 29/10/2010. Th : Med : Toulouse : 2010; 1060.
Goffin Y. Vaccination contre la grippe AH1N1 : connaissances, croyances et attitudes des patients à risque, Recherche qualitative 2011, Travail de fin d'études, Liège.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.