Article (Scientific journals)
Vagina, abdominal skin, and aponeurosis: do they have similar biomechanical properties?
Gabriel, Boris; Rubod, Chrystele; Brieu, Mathias et al.
2011In International Urogynecology Journal, 22 (1), p. 23-7
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Gabriel B 2011.pdf
Publisher postprint (169.16 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Abdomen; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomechanics; Cadaver; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Pelvic Organ Prolapse/physiopathology; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Tendons/physiology; Vagina/physiology
Abstract :
[en] INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: despite minimal fundamental works, there is an increasing use of meshes in urogynecology. The concept is mainly based on experiences with abdominal wall surgery. We aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue, abdominal aponeurosis, and skin. METHODS: samples from 11 fresh women cadavers without prolapse were collected. Uniaxial tension tests were performed and stress-strain curves were obtained. RESULTS: biomechanical properties of the vagina, aponeurosis, and skin differed significantly. The aponeurosis was much more rigid and less extendible than the vagina and skin. Vaginal tissue was less rigid but more extendible than skin. There was no difference between the vagina and skin at low strains (p = 0.341), but a highly significant difference at large strains (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: skin and aponeurosis are not suited to predict vaginal tissue biomechanics. We should be cautious when transferring experiences from abdominal wall surgery to vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Disciplines :
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)
Author, co-author :
Gabriel, Boris
Rubod, Chrystele
Brieu, Mathias
Dedet, Bruno
DE LANDSHEERE, Laurent  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Gynécologie-Obstétrique CHR
Delmas, Vincent
Cosson, Michel
Language :
English
Title :
Vagina, abdominal skin, and aponeurosis: do they have similar biomechanical properties?
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
International Urogynecology Journal
ISSN :
0937-3462
eISSN :
1433-3023
Publisher :
Springer, Germany
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Pages :
23-7
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 January 2013

Statistics


Number of views
81 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
46
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
35
OpenCitations
 
36

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi