[en] Plant traits are particularly important in determining plant community structure. However, how can one identify which traits are the most important in driving community assembly? Here we propose a method 1) to quantify the direction and strength of trait selection during community assembly and 2) to obtain parsimonious lists of traits that can predict species relative bundances in plant communities. We tested our method using floristic data from 32 plots experiencing different treatments (fertilisation and grazing) in southern France. Twelve functional traits were measured on 68 species. We determined the direction and strength of selection on these 12 traits using a metric derived from a maximum entropy model (i.e. lambda). We then determined our parsimonious list of traits using a backward selection of traits based on these lambda values (for all treatments and in each treatment separately). We finally compared our method to two other methods: one based on iterative RLQ and the other based on an entropy-based forward selection of traits. We found major differences in the direction and strength of selection across the 12 traits and treatments. From the 12 traits, plant vegetative and reproductive heights, leaf dry matter content leaf nitrogen content, specific leaf area, and leaf phosphorus content were particularly important for predicting species relative abundances when considering all treatments together. Our method yielded results similar to those produced by the entropy-based approach but differed from those produced by the iterative RLQ, whose selected traits could not significantly predict species relative abundances. Together these results suggest that the assembly of these communities is primarily driven by a small number of key functional traits. We argue that our method provides an objective way of determining a parsimonious list of traits that together accurately predict community structure and which, despite its complementarities with entropy-based method, offers significant advantages.
Research Center/Unit :
the GDR 2574 ‘traits’ (CNRS France) the FQRNT Centre d’Étude de la Forêt
Ansquer P. et al. 2009. Functional traits as indicators of fodder provision over a short time scale in species-rich grasslands. Ann. Bot. 103: 117-126.
Bernhardt-Romermann M. et al. 2008. On the identification of the most suitable traits for plant functional trait analyses. Oikos 117: 1533-1541.
Cingolani A. M. et al. 2005. Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 50-59.
Cornelissen J. H. C. et al. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51: 335-380.
Daget P. and Poissonet J. 1971. Une méthode d'analyse phytologique des prairies. Ann. Agron. 22: 5-41.
Diaz S. et al. 2001. Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 497-508.
Diaz S. et al. 2007. Plant trait responses to grazing - a global synthesis. Global Change Biol. 13: 313-341.
Doledec S. et al. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3: 143-166.
Dray S. and Dufour A. B. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Software 22: 1-20.
Fayolle A. 2008. Structure des communautés de plantes herbacées sur les grands causses: stratégies fonctionnelles des espèces et interactions interspécifiques. - Montpellier SupAgro, p. 292.
Garnier E. et al. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630-2637.
Grime J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. - Wiley.
Kahmen S. et al. 2002. Conservation management of calcareous grasslands. Changes in plant species composition and response of functional traits during 25 years. Biol. Conserv. 104: 319-328.
Laliberté E. and Shipley B. 2010. Measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. - R package. The Comprehensive R Archive Net-work (CRAN).
Lande R. A. and Arnold S. A. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
Landsberg J. et al. 1999. Grazing response groups among understorey plants in arid rangelands. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 683-696.
Lavorel S. and Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16: 546-556.
Mokany K. and Roxburgh S. H. 2010. The importance of spatial scale for trait-abundance relations. Oikos 119: 1504-1514.
Ordonez J. C. et al. 2009. A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18: 137-149.
Pakeman R. J. and Quested H. M. 2007. Sampling plant functional traits: what proportion of the species need to be measured? Appl. Veg. Sci. 10: 91-96.
Pakeman R. J. et al. 2008. Impact of abundance weighting on the response of seed traits to climate and land use. J. Ecol. 96: 355-366.
Pillar V. D. 1999. On the identification of optimal plant functional types. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 631-640.
Poorter L. and Bongers F. 2006. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87: 1733-1743.
Pyankov V. I. et al. 1999. Leaf structure and specific leaf mass: the alpine desert plants of the eastern Pamirs, Tadjikistan. New Phytol. 143: 131-142.
Shipley B. 2010a. From plant traits to vegetation structure: chance and selection in the assembly of ecological communities. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
Shipley B. 2010b. Inferential permutation tests for maximum entropy models in ecology. Ecology 91: 2794-2805.
Shipley B. et al. 2006. From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science 314: 812-814.
Shipley B. et al. 2011. A strong test of a maximum entropy model of trait-based community assembly. Ecology 92: 507-517.
Sonnier G. et al. 2010. Plant traits, species pools and the prediction of relative abundance in plant communities: a maximum entropy approach. J. Veg. Sci. 21: 318-331.
Suding K. N. et al. 2008. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biol. 14: 1125-1140.
Vile D. et al. 2005. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann. Bot. 96: 1129-1136.
Weiher E. et al. 1999. Chalenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 609-620.
Westoby M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199: 213-227.
Wilson P. J. et al. 1999. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies. New Phytol. 143: 155-162.
Wright I. J. et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827.