[en] he introduction of new public transport systems can influence society in a multitude of ways ranging from modal choices and the environment to economic growth. This paper examines the determinants of light rail mode choice for medium- and long-distance trips (10 to 40 km) for a new light rail system in Flanders, Belgium. To investigate these choices, the effects of various transport system-specific factors (i.e., travel cost, in-vehicle travel time, transit punctuality, waiting time, access and egress time, transfers, and availability of seats) as well as the travelers' personal traits were analyzed by using an alternating logistic regression model, which explicitly takes into account the correlated responses for binary data. The data used for the analysis stem from a stated preference survey conducted in Flanders. The modeling results are in line with literature: most transport system-specific factors as well as socioeconomic variables, attitudinal factors, perceptions, and the frequency of using public transport contribute significantly to the preference for light rail transit. In particular, the results indicate that the use of light rail is strongly influenced by travel cost and in-vehicle travel time and to a lesser extent by waiting and access-egress time. Seat availability appeared to play a more important role than did transfers in deciding to choose light rail transit. The findings of this paper can be used by policy makers as a frame of reference to make light rail transit more successful.
Research Center/Unit :
Lepur : Centre de Recherche sur la Ville, le Territoire et le Milieu rural - ULiège LEMA - Local Environment Management and Analysis
Disciplines :
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...) Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Creemers, Lieve; Universiteit Hasselt - UH
Cools, Mario ; Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel - HUB
Tormans, Hans; Universiteit Hasselt - UH
Lateur, Pieter-Jan; Universiteit Hasselt - UH
Janssens, Davy; Universiteit Hasselt - UH
Wets, Geert; Universiteit Hasselt - UH
Language :
English
Title :
Identifying the Determinants of Light Rail Mode Choice for Medium- and Long-Distance Trips: Results from a Stated Preference Study
Publication date :
2012
Journal title :
Transportation Research Recordv: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
ISSN :
0361-1981
eISSN :
2169-4052
Publisher :
U.S. National Research Council, Washington, United States - District of Columbia
Steg, L. Can Public Transport Compete with the Private Car? International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences Research, Vol. 27, 2003, pp. 27-35.
Regionet Limburg. Regionaal Openbaar Vervoer in de Provincie Limburg. Conceptstreefbeeld. Vervoersmaatschappij De Lijn, Mechelen, Belgium, 2002.
Billings, S. B. Estimating the Value of a New Transit Option. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2011, pp. 525-536. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.03.013.
Senior, M. L. Impacts on Travel Behaviour of Greater Manchester's Light Rail Investment (Metrolink Phase 1): Evidence from Household Surveys and Census Data. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 187-197.
Mackett, R. L., and M. Edwards. The Impact of New Urban Public Transport Systems: Will the Expectations Be Met? Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1998, pp. 231-245.
Allison, P. D. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 2001.
SAS/STAT 9.1.3 User's Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C., 2008.
Schramm, L., K. Watkins, and S. Rutherford. Features That Affect Variability of Travel Time on Bus Rapid Transit Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2143, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 77-84.
Van Loon, R., P. Rietveld, and M. Brons. Travel-Time Reliability Impacts on Railway Passenger Demand: A Revealed Preference Analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 19, 2011, pp. 917-925.
Zhang, J., A. Fujiwara, and S. Thein. Capturing Travelers' Stated Mode Choice Preferences Under Influence of Income in Yangon City, Myanmar. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2008, pp. 49-62.
Outwater, M. L., G. Spitz, J. Lobb, M. Campbell, B. Sana, R. Pendyala, and W. Woodford. Characteristics of Premium Transit Services That Affect Mode Choice. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2011, pp. 605-623.
Ahern, A. A., and N. Tapley. The Use of Stated Preference Techniques to Model Modal Choices on Interurban Trips in Ireland. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 15-27.
Mattson, J., D. Peterson, D. Ripplinger, W. Thoms, and J. Hough. An Assessment of Demand for Rural Intercity Transportation Services in a Changing Environment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2145, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 108-114.
Hensher, D. A., and J. M. Rose. Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 428-443.
Ben-Akiva, M., and T. Morikawa. Comparing Ridership Attraction of Rail and Bus. Transport Policy, Vol. 2, 2002, pp. 107-116.
Bierlaire, M., K. W. Axhausen, and G. Abay. The Acceptance of Modal Innovation: The Case of Swissmetro. Presented at 1st Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland, 2001.
Chatterjee, K. Modelling the Dynamics of Bus Use in a Changing Travel Environment Using Panel Data. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2011, pp. 487-509.
Mackett, R., and E. Babalik-Sutcliffe. New Urban Rail Systems: A Policy Based Technique to Make Them More Successful. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2003, pp. 151-164.
Popuri, U., K. Proussaloglou, C. Ayvalik, F. Koppelman, and A. Lee. Importance of Traveler Attitudes in the Choice of Public Transportation to Work: Findings from the Regional Transportation Authority Attitudinal Survey. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2011, pp. 643-661.
Murray, S. J., D. Walton, and J. A. Thomas. Attitudes Towards Public Transport in New Zealand. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2010, pp. 915-929.
Domarchi, C., A. Tudela, and A. González. Effect of Attitudes, Habit and Affective Appraisal on Mode Choice: An Application to University Workers. Transportation, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2008, pp. 585-599.
Currie, G., A. Ahern, and A. Delbosc. Exploring the Drivers of Light Rail Ridership: An Empirical Route Level Analysis of Selected Australian, North American and European Systems. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2011, pp. 545-560.
Kuby, M., A. Barranda, and C. Upchurch. Factors Influencing Light-Rail Station Boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 223-247.
Kain, J., and Z. Liu. Secrets of Success: The Large Increases in Transit Ridership Achieved by Houston and San Diego Transit Providers. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 601-624.
Hass-Klau, C., and G. Crampton. Future of Urban Transport: Learning from Success and Weakness-Light Rail. Environmental and Transport Planning, Brighton, United Kingdom, 2002.
Cools, M., K. Declercq, D. Janssens, and G. Wets. Onderzoek Verp-laatsingsgedrag Vlaanderen 4.2 (2009-2010): Tabellenrapport [Travel Behavior Research Flanders 4.2 (2009-2010): Table Report]. Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium, 2010.
Hensher, D. A. Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practice. Transportation, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1994, pp. 107-133.
Faivre D'Arcier, B., O. Andan, and C. Raux. Stated Adaptation Surveys and Choice Process: Some Methodological Issues. Transportation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1998, pp. 169-185.
Wardman, M. A Comparison of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behaviour. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998, pp. 71-91.
Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
Couper, M. P., A. Kapteyn, M. Schonlau, and J. Winter. Noncoverage and Nonresponse in an Internet Survey. Social Science Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2007, pp. 131-148.
Hayslett, M. M., and B. M. Wildemuth. Pixels or Pencils? The Relative Effectiveness of Web-Based Versus Paper Surveys. Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2004, pp. 73-93.
Hensher, D. A. How Do Respondents Process Stated Choice Experiments? Attribute Consideration Under Varying Information Load. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 21, 2006, pp. 861-878.
Frank, K. A. Impact of a Confounding Variable on a Regression Coefficient. Sociological Methods Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2000, pp. 147-194.
Scherer, M. Is Light Rail More Attractive to Users Than Bus Transit? Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2144, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 11-19.
De Witte, A., C. Macharis, P. Lannoy, C. Polain, T. Steenberghen, and S. Van de Walle. The Impact of "Free" Public Transport: The Case of Brussels. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2006, pp. 671-689.
Cools, M., K. Brijs, H. Tormans, E. Moons, D. Janssens, and G. Wets. The Socio-Cognitive Links Between Road Pricing Acceptability and Changes in Travel-Behavior. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 45, No. 8, 2011, pp. 779-788.
Dorbritz, R., M. Lüthi, U. A. Weidmann, and A. Nash. Effects of Onboard Ticket Sales on Public Transport Reliability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2110, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 112-119.
