Article (Scientific journals)
Health claims assessment in the field of joint and cartilage: a consensus viewpoint of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science
Bruyère, Olivier; Avouac, Bernard; Richette, Pascal et al.
2012In Current Medical Research and Opinion, 28 (4), p. 611-6
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Health claims assessment in the field of joint and cartilage....pdf
Publisher postprint (139.96 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Biomarkers; Cartilage; Health claim; Joint; Nutrition; Surrogate
Abstract :
[en] Abstract Introduction: In 2006, the European Parliament and Council issued a regulation (No. 1924/2006) for the nutrition and health claims made on foods, including food supplements. According to the regulation, the use of nutrition and health claims shall only be permitted if the substance in respect of which the claim is made has been shown to have a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect. In the field of joint and cartilage health, there is no clear scientific-based definition of the nature of such a beneficial nutritional or physiological effect. The objective of this paper is to scientifically define the possible content of health claims related to joint and cartilage health and to provide scientific guidelines for the design of clinical studies which need to be adopted to substantiate such health claims. Methods: Literature review up to September 2011 followed by a consensus expert discussion organized by the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES). Results: In line with the general principles of the PASSCLAIM and the Codex recommendations, the GREES identified four acceptable health claims related to joint and cartilage health based on the effects on discomfort, joint and cartilage structural integrity or risk factors for joint and cartilage diseases. The GREES considers that randomized controlled trials on a relevant outcome is the best design to assess health claims. Moreover, animal studies could also be of interest to substantiate some health claims, to assess the clinical relevance of endpoints used in human studies or to extrapolate data obtained in patients to the target (apparently) healthy population. Conclusion: According to the methodology and biomarkers used in the study and whether or not additional animal studies are provided to support the claim, various health claims can be acceptable in the field of joint and cartilage health.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Avouac, Bernard
Richette, Pascal
Maheu, Emmanuel
Bruel, Pierre
Coxam, Véronique
Guillou, George B
Lugrin, Anne-Emmanuelle
Merceron, Christophe
Pauquai, Thomas
Rannou, François
Ythier-Moury, Pascale
Tsouderos, Yannis
Urban, Nelly
Rovati, Lucio
Guicheux, Jérôme
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
More authors (7 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Health claims assessment in the field of joint and cartilage: a consensus viewpoint of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science
Publication date :
April 2012
Journal title :
Current Medical Research and Opinion
ISSN :
0300-7995
eISSN :
1473-4877
Publisher :
LibraPharm Ltd, Newbury Berkshire, United Kingdom
Volume :
28
Issue :
4
Pages :
611-6
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 18 June 2012

Statistics


Number of views
88 (9 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
7 (7 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi