[en] Various approaches exist to relate saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) to grain-size data. Most methods use a single grain-size parameter and hence omit the information encompassed by the entire grain-size distribution. This study compares two data-driven modelling methods, i.e.multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks, that use the entire grain-size distribution data as input for Ks prediction. Besides the predictive capacity of the methods, the uncertainty associated with the model predictions is also evaluated, since such information is important for stochastic groundwater flow and contaminant transport modelling.
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are combined with a generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach to predict Ks from grain-size data. The resulting GLUE-ANN hydraulic conductivity predictions and associated uncertainty estimates are compared with those obtained from the multiple linear regression models by a leave-one-out cross-validation. The GLUE-ANN ensemble prediction proved to be slightly better than multiple linear regression. The prediction uncertainty, however, was reduced by half an order of magnitude on average, and decreased at most by an order of magnitude. This demonstrates that the proposed method outperforms classical data-driven modelling techniques. Moreover, a comparison with methods from literature demonstrates the importance of site specific calibration.
The dataset used for this purpose originates mainly from unconsolidated sandy sediments of the Neogene aquifer, northern Belgium. The proposed predictive models are developed for 173 grain-size -Ks pairs. Finally, an application with the optimized models is presented for a borehole lacking Ks data.
Disciplines :
Geological, petroleum & mining engineering
Author, co-author :
Rogiers, Bart; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL > Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences > Hydrogeologie
Mallants, Dirk; Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) > Health and Safety > Institute for Environment
Batelaan, Okke; Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB > Dept. of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering
Gedeon, Matej
Huysmans, Marijke; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL > Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences > Hydrogeologie
Dassargues, Alain ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur GEO3 > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Language :
English
Title :
Estimation of hydraulic conductivity and its uncertainty from grain-size data using GLUE and artificial neural networks
Agyare WA, Park SJ, Vlek PL (2007) Artificial neural network estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Vadose Zone J 6(2): 423-431.
Asefa T (2009) Ensemble streamflow forecast: A GLUE-based neural network approach. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(5): 1155-1163.
Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals computing design and application. J Microbiol Methods 43(1): 3-31.
Beerten K, Wemaere I, Gedeon M, Labat S, Rogiers B, Mallants D, Salah S, Leterme B (2010) Geological hydrogeological and hydrological data for the Dessel disposal site Project near surface disposal of category A waste at Dessel-Version 1, NIROND-TR 2009-05 E, 261.
Berry M, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques for marketing sales and customer support. Wiley, New York, 464 pp.
Beven K, Freer J (2001) Equifinality data assimilation and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 249(1-4): 11-29.
Carman PC (1938) The determination of the specific surface of powders. J Soc Chem Ind Trans 57: 225-234.
Carman PC (1956) Flow of gases through porous media. Butterworths Scientific Publications, London.
Carrier WD (2003) Goodbye Hazen; hello Kozeny-Carman. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129(11): 1054.
Castejón Limas M, Ordieres Meré JB, González Marcos A, de Pisón Ascacibar FJM, Pernía Espinoza AV, Alba Elías F (2010) AMORE: A MORE flexible neural network package. R package version 0. 2-12. http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=AMORE.
Coppola EA, Rana AJ, Poulton MM, Szidarovszky F, Uhl VW (2005) A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations. Ground Water 43(2): 231-241.
Cronican A, Gribb M (2004) Literature review: Equations for predicting hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size data. Supplement to technical note entitled: Hydraulic conductivity prediction for sandy soils. Ground Water 42(3): 459-464.
Darcy H (1856) Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Dalmont, Paris.
Fletcher L, Katkovnik V, Steffens F, Engelbrecht A (1998) Optimizing the number of hidden nodes of a feedforward artificial neural network. In: Neural networks proceedings IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, the 1998 IEEE international joint conference, vol 2, pp 1608-1612.
Gunst FR, Mason LR (1980) Regression analysis and its applications: A data oriented approach. Dekker, New York, 402 pp.
Haykin S (1999) Neural networks-A comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hazen A (1892) Some physical properties of sands and gravels. Massachusetts State Board of Health Annual Report 539-556.
Henseler J (1995) Back propagation. In: Braspenning PJ, Thuijsman F, Weijters AJMM (eds) Artificial neural networks; an introduction to ANN theory and practice, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, pp 37-66.
Hill T, Lewicki P (2007) STATISTICS: Methods and applications. StatSoft, Tulsa.
Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5): 359-366.
Hornik K (1991) Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw 4(2): 251-257.
Jain A, Kumar AM (2007) Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 7(2): 585-592.
Joorabchi A, Zhang H, Blumenstein M (2009) Application of artificial neural networks to groundwater dynamics in coastal aquifers. In: Proceedings of the 10th international coastral symposium. J Coast Res 56: 966-970.
Khalil B, Ouarda TBMJ, St-Hilaire A (2011) Estimation of water quality characteristics at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks and canonical correlation analysis. J Hydrol 405(3-4): 277-287.
Kişi Ö (2007) Streamflow forecasting using different artificial neural network algorithms. J Hydrol Eng (October): 532-539.
Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (2007) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Cengage learning, 906 pp.
Klute A (1965) Laboratory measurements of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. In: Black CA et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1, Agronomy, vol 9, pp 210-220.
Kozeny J (1927) Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss Wien 136(2a): 271.
Linderman M, Liu J, Qi J, An L, Ouyang Z, Yang J, Tan Y (2004) Using artificial neural networks to map the spatial distribution of understorey bamboo from remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 25(9): 1685-1700.
Minasny B, Hopmans JW, Harter T, Eching SO, Tuli A, Denton MA (2004) Neural networks prediction of soil hydraulic functions for alluvial soils using multistep outflow data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(2): 417-429.
Morshed J, Kaluarachchi JJ (1998) Application of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm in flow and transport simulations. Adv Water Resour 22(2): 145-158.
Nakhaei M (2005) Estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity of granular material using artificial neural network based on grain size distribution curve. J Sci Islam Repub Iran 16(1): 55-62.
Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ, Timlin DJ (1999) The current status of pedotransfer functions: Their accuracy reliability and utility in field- and regional-scale modeling. In: Corwin DL, Loague K, Ellsworth TR (eds) Assessment of non-point source pollution in the vadose zone: Geophysical monograph, vol 108. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 223-234.
Prechelt L (1998) Automatic early stopping using cross validation: Quantifying the criteria. Neural Netw 11(4): 761-767.
R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www. R-project. org/.
Sarkar D (1995) Methods to speed up error back-propagation learning algorithm. ACM Comput Surv 27(4): 519-542.
Sarle WS (ed) (1997) Neural Network FAQ. Periodic posting to the Usenet newsgroup comp. ai. neural-nets. ftp://ftp. sas. com/pub/neural/FAQ. html, visited on 11/11/2010.
Schaap M, Leij FJ (1998) Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Tillage Res 47(1-2): 37-42.
Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (1998) Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62: 847-855.
Schaap M, Leij F, van Genuchten MTh (2001) Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251(3-4): 163-176.
Scott D (1979) On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika 66: 605-610.
Soetens T (2008) Oriënterend bodemonderzoek in het kader van de aankoop van het terrein voor de oppervlakteberging van Umicore. NIRAS/ONDRAF 245. 090-MER000, 2008-1119 herz. 1.
Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Lee SU, Batchelder R (2008) Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. Water Resour Res 44: W00B06.
Swingler K (1996) Applying neural networks: A practical guide. Academic Press, London.
Tiwari MK, Chatterjee C (2010) Uncertainty assessment and ensemble flood forecasting using bootstrap based artificial neural networks (BANNs). J Hydrol 382(1-4): 20-33.
Tollenaere T (1990) SuperSAB fast adaptive back propagation with good scaling properties. Neural Netw 3(5): 561-573.
Valverde Ramírez MC, Campos Velho HF, de Ferreira NJ (2005) Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to the Sao Paulo region. J Hydrol 301: 146-162.
Van De Genachte G, Mallants D, Ramos J, Deckers JA, Feyen J (1996) Estimating infiltration parameters from basic soil properties. Hydrol Process 10(5): 687-701.
Vienken T, Dietrich P (2011) Field evaluation of methods for determining hydraulic conductivity from grain-size data. J Hydrol 400(1-2): 58-71.
Wang T, Wedin D, Zlotnik VA (2009) Field evidence of a negative correlation between saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil carbon in a sandy soil. Water Resour Res 45(7): W07503. doi: 10. 1029/2008WR006865.
Wemaere I, Marivoet J, Labat S (2008) Hydraulic conductivity variability of the Boom clay in north-east Belgium based on four core drilled boreholes. Phys Chem Earth 33(S1): 24-36.
Wemaere I, Marivoet J, Labat S, Beaufays R, Maes T (2002) Mol-1 borehole (April-May 1997): Core manipulations and determination of hydraulic conductivities in the laboratory. SCK•CEN Report R-3590, 56 pp.
Zou R, Lung WS, Wu J (2007) An adaptive neural network embedded genetic algorithm approach for inverse water quality modeling. Water Resour Res 43: W08427. doi: 10. 1029/2006WR005158.