[en] This paper aims to show how Husserl’s concept of intentionality detaches itself from the background of a thorough and recurrent argument against psychologism. Noting that, primarily, the concept of intentionality was recovered by Brentano’s psychology, it seemed to us important to show how Husserl’s intentionality, as it is conceived in the Logical investigations, distinguishes itself from the “intentional inexistence” that Brentano describes in his Psychology from an empirical standpoint. Showing what parts of this psychology were rejected and what was maintained in Husserl’s theory should be the first concern of those who intend to study the phenomenological concept of intentionality.
Disciplines :
Philosophy & ethics
Author, co-author :
Gyemant, Maria ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de philosophie > Phénoménologies
Language :
French
Title :
« Objet et contenu – L’intentionnalité husserlienne face à son héritage psychologiste »
Alternative titles :
[en] "Object and Content. Husserlian Intentionality confronted to its Psychologist Heritage."
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
F. Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen standpunkt, Leipzig, Felix Meiner Verlag, 1924.
R. D. Rollinger, Husserl's Position in the School of Brentano, Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
B. Smith, Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano, Illinois, Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago and LaSalle, 1994.
K. Twardowski, «Sur la théorie du contenu et de l'objet des représentations (1894)», in E. Husserl, K. Twardowski, Sur les objets intentionnels (1893-1901), trad. fr. Jacques English, Paris, Vrin, 1993, p. 85-200.
E. Husserl, «Objets intentionnels (1894)», in E. Husserl, K. Twardowski, Sur les objets intentionnels, op. cit., p. 277-326.
E. Husserl, Recherches logiques, tome II, 2e partie, trad. fr. H. Elie, A. Kelkel, R. Schérer, Paris, PUF, 1962, 2002, p. 231.
J. Benoist, Représentation sans objet, Paris, PUF, 2001, p. 184.
B. Bolzano, Wissenschaftslehre, Band II, Stuttgart, Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1987, §§46-90.
E. Husserl, Recherches logiques, tome III, trad. fr. H. Elie, A. Kelkel, R. Schérer, Paris, PUF, 1963.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.