Reference : Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Normal Ejection Fraction Is Ass...
Scientific journals : Article
Human health sciences : General & internal medicine
Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Normal Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction as Assessed by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography: A Multicenter Study.
Adda, J. [> >]
Mielot, C. [> >]
Giorgi, R. [> >]
Cransac, F. [> >]
Zirphile, X. [> >]
Donal, E. [> >]
Sportouch-Dukhan, C. [> >]
Réant, P. [> >]
Laffitte, S. [> >]
Cade, S. [> >]
Le Dolley, Y. [> >]
Thuny, F. [> >]
Touboul, N. [> >]
Lavoute, C. [> >]
Avierinos, J. F. [> >]
Lancellotti, Patrizio mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Imagerie cardiaque fonctionnelle par échographie >]
Habib, G. [> >]
Circulation: cardiovascular imaging
[en] Background- Low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) is sometimes observed in severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite normal ejection fraction, but its frequency and mechanisms are still debated. We aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with LFLG AS and assess the presence of longitudinal left ventricular dysfunction in these patients. Methods and Results- In a multicenter prospective study, 340 consecutive patients with severe AS and normal ejection fraction were studied. Longitudinal left ventricular function was assessed by 2D-strain and global afterload by valvulo-arterial impedance. Patients were classified according to flow and gradient: low flow was defined as a stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m(2), low gradient as a mean gradient ≤40 mm Hg. Most patients (n=258, 75.9%) presented with high-gradient AS, and 82 patients (24.1%) with low-gradient AS. Among the latter, 52 (15.3%) presented with normal flow and low gradient and 30 (8.8%) with LFLG. As compared with normal flow and low gradient, patients with LFLG had more severe AS (aortic valve area=0.7±0.12 cm(2) versus 0.86±0.14 cm(2)), higher valvulo-arterial impedance (5.5±1.1 versus 4±0.8 mm Hg/mL/m(2)), and worse longitudinal left ventricular function (basal longitudinal strain=-11.6±3.4 versus -14.8±3%; P<0.001 for all). Conclusions- LFLG AS is observed in 9% of patients with severe AS and normal ejection fraction and is associated with high global afterload and reduced longitudinal systolic function. Patients with normal-flow low-gradient AS are more frequent and present with less severe AS, normal afterload, and less severe longitudinal dysfunction. Severe left ventricular longitudinal dysfunction is a new explanation to the concept of LFLG AS.
Service de Cardiologie
Researchers ; Professionals

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Open access
Adda et al, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012.pdfPublisher postprint1.7 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.