Adult; Aged; Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology; Female; Hand; Humans; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/physiopathology/therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Cortex/physiology; Paralysis/physiopathology/therapy; Physical Stimulation/methods; Prognosis; Severity of Illness Index; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been proposed as a prognostic tool in stroke patients. Most of the previous studies agree in considering the presence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the first days after a stroke as an indicator of good outcome. In the present study, we have assessed the prognostic value of the absence of response to early TMS on hand motor recovery in stroke patients with complete hand palsy at onset due to ischemia in the area of the middle cerebral artery. METHODS: Fifteen patients submitted to TMS within 48 hours of stroke onset (defined as day 1) and again after 1 year. They were also evaluated clinically on day 1 by a scale derived from the Medical Research Council (MRC) and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stroke scale; they were reevaluated by the same scales and by Barthel Index on day 365. RESULTS: On day 1, all the patients had complete hand palsy and no response to TMS; their NIH scores showed great variability. After 1 year, 6 of 15 patients regained small and prolonged MEPs, together with a very poor and not functionally useful motor recovery. NIH scores were significantly improved. Barthel Index scores showed large interindividual differences and were not correlated with MRC scores. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients with complete hand palsy, the absence of response to TMS in the first hours is predictive of absent or very poor, not useful, hand motor recovery.
Chu N, Wu T. Motor response patterns and prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients. In: Lissens M, ed. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters Press; 1992:127-145.
Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke, II: central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain. 1993;116:1371-1385.
Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, Ducarne H, Noel P. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:349-354.
Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, Escudero M, López-Trigo J. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:1854-1859.
van Rijckevorsel-Harmant K, Boon V. Central magnetic stimulation, somatosensory potentials and clinical evaluation during a rehabilitation treatment in hemiplegic patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87:102. Abstract.
Zgur T, Prevec TS, Golfar N. Correlation of motor evoked potentials to motor deficit during the recovery of ischemic stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87:102. Abstract.
Arac N, Sagduyu A, Binai S, Ertekin C. Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:2183-2186.
Rapisarda G, Bastings E, Maertens de Noordhout A, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke. 1996;27:2191-2196.
Marshall RS, Mohr JP. Current management of ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:6-16.
Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray MNF. Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of human brain. J Physiol (Lond). 1987;388:397-419.
Maertens de Noordhout A. Stimulation Percutanée du Cortex Moteur Chez l'Homme: Données Physiologiques et Utilisation Clinique. Liège, Belgium: Mardaga; 1991. Thesis.
Medical Research Council. Aids to Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System. London, England: HMSO; 1976.
Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989;56:660-662.
Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;19:604-607.
Barker AT, Freeston IL, Jalinous R, Jarratt JA. Magnetic and electric stimulation of the brain: safety aspects. In: Noninvasive Stimulation of Brain and Spinal Cord. New York, NY: Alan R Liss Inc; 1988: 131-144. Rossini PM, Marsden CD, eds. Neurology and Neurobiology, vol 41.
Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke: outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084-1089.
Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181-1188.
Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1497-1500.
Wade DT, Hewer RL. Motor loss and swallowing difficulty after stroke: frequency, recovery, and prognosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987;76:50-54.
Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke, I: natural history of central motor conduction. Brain. 1993;116:1355-1370.