Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the 'FLY' (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study.
[en] BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to compare the two endoscopic techniques of laparoscopy and fertiloscopy in routine evaluation of the pelvis in infertile women. METHODS: A total of 92 women was selected in 14 University Hospitals to undergo fertiloscopy followed by transabdominal laparoscopy by a team of two surgeons in each hospital. RESULTS: A high degree of concordance was observed between these two techniques, in that if fertiloscopy did not detect any abnormalities, this was also confirmed by laparoscopy. Discordance was observed in similar numbers of cases: eight after laparoscopy and nine after fertiloscopy. The diagnostic index for fertiloscopy and laparoscopy was calculated; sensitivity (86 and 87% respectively) and negative predictive value (64 and 67% respectively) were similar. The kappa index was also calculated for each of the six structures/regions (right/left tube; right/left ovary; peritoneum of pouch of Douglas; posterior uterus), and concordance (0.78 to 0.91) was considered almost complete. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm fertiloscopy as a minimally invasive safe procedure that may be considered as an alternative to diagnostic laparoscopy in the routine assessment of women without clinical or ultrasound evidence of pelvic disease. On the basis of the additional advantages of fertiloscopy, namely salpingoscopy or microsalpingoscopy, it is considered that fertiloscopy could replace laparoscopy as a routine procedure in such women.
Disciplines :
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)
Author, co-author :
Watrelot, A.
NISOLLE, Michelle ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Gynécologie-Obstétrique CHR
Chelli, H.
Hocke, C.
Rongières, C.
Racinet, C.
Language :
English
Title :
Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the 'FLY' (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study.
Brosens, I., Gordts, S. and Campo, R. (2001) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy but not standard laparoscopy reveals subtle endometriotic adhesions of the ovary. Fertil. Steril., 75, 1009-1012.
Cicinelli, E., Matteo, M., Causio, F., Schonauer, L.M., Pinto, V. and Galantino, P. (2001) Tolerability of the mini-pan-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalphingography in an outpatient infertility investigation. Fertil. Steril., 76, 1048-1051.
Cochran, W. and Cox, G. (1957) Experimental Designs. Wiley, New York.
Cundiff, G., Carr, B.R. and Marshburn, P.B. (1995) Infertile couples with a normal hysterosalpingogram. Reproductive outcome and its relationship to clinical and laparoscopic findings. J. Reprod. Med., 40, 19-24.
Darai, E., Desolle, L., Lecuru, F. and Soriano, D. (2000) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women. A prospective comparative study. Hum. Reprod., 15, 2379-2382.
Decker, A. (1944) Culdoscopy: A new method in the diagnosis of pelvic disease. Am. J. Surg., 64, 40-44.
Gordts, S., Campo, R., Rombauts, L. and Brosens, I. (1998) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy as an outpatient procedure for infertility investigation. Hum. Reprod., 13, 99-103.
Gordts, S.J., Campo, R. and Brosens, I. (2000) Office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women. A prospective comparative study. Hum. Reprod., 15, 2379-2382.
Gordts, S., Watrelot, A., Campo, R. and Brosens, I. (2001) Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil. Steril., 76, 1238-1241.
Kelly, J.V. and Rock, J. (1956) Culdoscopy for diagnosis in infertility. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 76, 523-537.
Marconi, G. and Quintana, R. (1998) Methylene blue dyeing of cellular nuclei during salpingoscopy, a new in-vivo method to evaluate vitality of tubal epithelium. Hum. Reprod., 13, 3414-3417.
Mintz, M. (1987) Actualisation de la culdoscopy transvaginale en decubitus dorsal. Un nouvel endoscope à vision directe muni d'une aiguille à ponction incorporée dans l'axe. Contracept. Fertil. Sex., 15, 401-404.
Mol, B., Swart, P., Dijkman, B., Wertheim, P., Lijmen, J., Van Der Veen, F. and Bossuyt, P.M. (1996) Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. Hum. Reprod., 11, 1204-1208.
Odent, M. (1973) Hydrocolpotomie et hydroculdoscopie. Nouv. Press. Med., 2, 187.
Querleu, D. and Leroy, J.L. (1990) Faut-il encore réaliser des hystérographies dans le bilan des infécondités? Contracept. Fertil. Sex., 18, 847-856.
Watrelot, A. (2001) Fertiloscopy. In Atlas of Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, Chapter 13, pp. 121-136.
Watrelot, A., Dreyfus, J.M. and Andine, J.P. (1998a) Fertiloscopy first results (120 cases report). Fertil. Steril., Suppl. 1, S42.
Watrelot, A., Gordts, S., Andine, J.P. and Brosens, I. (1998b) Une nouvelle approche diagnostique: La fertiloscopie. Endomag, 21, 7-8.
Watrelot, A., Dreyfus, J.M. and Andine, J.P. (199a) Evaluation of the performance of fertiloscopy in 160 consecutive infertile patients with no obvious pathology. Hum. Reprod., 14, 707-711.
Watrelot, A., Dreyfus, J.M., Andine, J.P. and Cohen, M. (1999b) Fertiloscopy: Technical basis and indications. Rev. Gynecol. Obstet., 6, 47-52.
Watrelot, A., Dreyfus, J.M. and Cohen, M. (2002) Systematic salpingoscopy and microsalpingoscopy during fertiloscopy. A 500 cases report. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc., 9, 117-123.