Article (Scientific journals)
An Economic Evaluation of Quantitative Ultrasonometry as Pre-Screening Test for the Identification of Patients with Osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, Mickaël; Ethgen, Olivier; Bruyère, Olivier et al.
2008In Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 16 (6), p. 429-438
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
DMO_Hiligsmann.pdf
Publisher postprint (360.64 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Background: Screening for osteoporosis has been recommended to identify patients at high risk of fracture in order to provide preventative treatment. Given the limited availability of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and health resources, quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) has emerged as an attractive tool for the mass screening scenario. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a screening strategy using QUS as a pre-screening tool for bone densitometry would be cost effective and, if so, at what cut-off thresholds. Methods: Decision analytic models were used to compare the cost effectiveness and cost utility of several screening strategies: DXA measurement alone and pre-screening strategies that use different QUS index cut-off thresholds. For each strategy, and for hypothetical cohorts of women, we estimated the number of DXA scans required, the number of osteoporotic patients detected and missed, the total screening cost, and the incremental cost per patient detected. A validated Markov microsimulation model with a lifetime horizon and from a healthcare perspective was also computed in order to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of the alternative screening strategies combined with 5 years of alendronate therapy for women who have osteoporosis (T-score -2.5 or less). Results: The DXA strategy had the highest cost and the highest number of patients with osteoporosis detected. Pre-screening strategies using QUS reduced the number of DXA scans per patient with osteoporosis detected and the total screening cost but they also missed patients with osteoporosis as the QUS index decreased. Pre-screening strategies using QUS T-scores of 0.0, -0.5, -2.0, and -2.5 were dominated by extended dominance, as their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were higher than that of the next more effective alternative. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility frontiers included no screening, pre-screening using QUS T-scores of -1.0 and -1.5, and DXA measurement alone. Conclusion: These results suggest that QUS may be useful as a pre-screening tool for bone densitometry given the limited availability of DXA and health resources, and that the QUS index T-scores of -1.0 and -1.5 are the most appropriate index.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)
Author, co-author :
Hiligsmann, Mickaël ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC - École de gestion de l'ULiège > Economie industrielle
Ethgen, Olivier ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique : aspects spécifiques
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie et santé publique - Département des sciences de la santé publique
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie et santé publique
Language :
English
Title :
An Economic Evaluation of Quantitative Ultrasonometry as Pre-Screening Test for the Identification of Patients with Osteoporosis
Publication date :
2008
Journal title :
Disease Management and Health Outcomes
ISSN :
1173-8790
Publisher :
Adis International
Volume :
16
Issue :
6
Pages :
429-438
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 07 April 2009

Statistics


Number of views
163 (9 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
8
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
11

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi