Article (Scientific journals)
Some conceptual problems with the classical theory of behaviour
Anselme, Patrick
2007In Behavioural Processes, 75 (3), p. 259-275
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Anselme (2007).pdf
Publisher postprint (569.49 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
anticipation; attention; behaviour; inhibition; interference; motivation
Abstract :
[en] Behaviour is usually assumed to depend on the reach of a critical intensity-termed reactivity threshold-by its motivation. This view represents a simple, predictive theoretical framework in ethology and animal psychology. However, it is here argued that only the influence of an isolated motivation on behaviour can be explained that way; that such a view fails to account for behaviour when several motivations are jointly activated. Upon analysis, the classical theory of behaviour (CTB) proves to be under-specified and thus leads to three conceptual problems that make it logically inconsistent for the study of multiple motivations. A revision of the CTB, called anticipatory dynamics model (ADM), is then developed in order to bring a theoretical solution to these conceptual problems. The ADM hypothesizes that an organism's motivational interactions are due to the limitation of the organism's attentional resources. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Animal psychology, ethology & psychobiology
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Anselme, Patrick ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Neuroscience comportementale et psychopharmacologie expér.
Language :
English
Title :
Some conceptual problems with the classical theory of behaviour
Publication date :
2007
Journal title :
Behavioural Processes
ISSN :
0376-6357
Publisher :
Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Volume :
75
Issue :
3
Pages :
259-275
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 January 2010

Statistics


Number of views
67 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
13
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
8
OpenCitations
 
7

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi