[en] BACKGROUND: Cutaneous sensorial perception is complex and proves to be difficult to quantify. Skin sensitivity to mechanical distension is largely unexplored. We have developed an original method aimed at quantifiying these physiological parameters.VOLUNTEERS AND METHODS: The study was performed on 24 adult volunteers aged 20 to 50 years. A Cutometer SEM 474 equipped with 2 and 4 mm diameter probes was used to exert a progressive or a steep suction on the cheeks. The intensities of both the suction and the skin deformation observed at the earliest moment the traction was perceived by the volunteers were recorded.RESULTS: The liminar sensorial detection under progressive suction force was 1.5 times lower when using the 4 mm probe than the 2 mm probe. Suction necessary for liminar sensation was 7 times lower under steep suction than in response to the progressive mode. The skin deformation corresponding to the liminar sensorial perception was almost constant (C=0.5 p. 100) for each subject. By contrast, a large inter individual heterogeneity unrelated to age was present.COMMENTS: Sensitivity of facial skin to stretching can be explored using a precise suction method. Perception is more related to the rate of traction than to the surface area submitted to suction. Cutaneous deformation, nearly constant for each individual, appears to be the main parameter. Steep and progressive suctions appear to stimulate distinct types of mechanoreceptors. The presently described method can be applied in cosmetology and in functional investigation of various diseases such as diabetes, acromegaly and atopic dermatitis among others.
Disciplines :
Dermatology
Author, co-author :
Martalo, O.
Henry, Frédérique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
Pierard, Gérald ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Dermatopathologie
Language :
French
Title :
Seuil liminaire de la perception d'un etirement cutane
Alternative titles :
[en] Liminal Perception Threshold of Cutaneous Distension
Reznik M. (1996) Structure et Fonctions du systéme nerveux cutané. Pathol Biol 44:831-837.
Piérard G.E., Nikkels-Tassoudji N., Piérard-Franchimont C. (1995) Influence of the test area on the mechanical properties of skin. Dermatology 191:9-15.
Piérard G.E., Henry F. (1995) Essai de classement catégoriel des propriétés biomécaniques de la peau. Evaluations par la méthode de succion. Nouv Dermatol 14:630-636.
Piérard G.E., Masson P., Rodrigues L., Rogiers V., Berardesca E., Elsner P. (1999) EEMCO guidance to the in vivo assessment of tensile functional properties of the skin. Part 1: Relevance to the structures and ageing of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 12:352-362.
Axelrod S., Cohen L.D. (1961) Senescence and embedded-figure performance in vision and touch. Percept Mot Skills 12:283-288.
Thornbury J.M., Mistretta C.M. (1981) Tactile sensitivity as a function of age. J Gerontol 36:34-39.
Stevens J.C. (1992) Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol 47:35-40.
Woodward K.L. (1993) The relationship between skin compliance, age, gender, and tactile discriminative thresholds in humans. Somatosens. Mot Res 10:63-67.
Stevens J.C., Patterson M.Q. (1995) Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span. Sens Mot Res 29-47.
Stevens J.C., Cruz L.A. (1996) Spatial acuity of touch: Ubiquitous decline with aging revealed by repeated threshold testing. Sens Mot Res 13:1-10.
Eisfeld W., Vienenkötter T., Tara Y., Busch P. (1999) Evaluation of tactile skin properties by piezoelectric sensors. SÖFW J 125:1-12.