Full Text

• Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
• Akrich, M. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205–224). The MIT Press.
• Alcorn, J. B. (1994). Noble Savage or Noble State?: Northern Myths and Southern Realities in Biodiversity Conservation. Etnoecológica: Revista Internacional, Trilingüe, Dedicada al Estudio Del Manejo Tradicional y Concervación de La Naturaleza, 2(3), 6–19.
• Almeida, F. (2017). Legislative Pathways for Securing Community-Based Property Rights. Rights and Resources Initiative.
• Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The Biocultural Labels Initiative: Supporting Indigenous Rights in Data Derived From Genetic Resources. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 4, e59230. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.59230
• Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (2013). The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition. New York: Verso Books.
• Argumedo, A. (2008). The Potato Park, Peru: Conserving Agrobiodiversity in an Andean Indigenous Biocultural Heritage Area. In T. Amend, J. Brown, A. Kothari, A. Phillips, & S. Stolton (Eds.), Protected Landscapes and Agrobiodiversity Values. Kaspareg Verlag, IUCN>Z, Vol. 1, pp. 45–58.
• Argumedo, A., & Pimbert, M. (2008). Protecting Farmers’ Rights with Indigenous Biocultural Heritage Territories: The Experience of the Potato Park (p. 12). International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), Asociacion ANDES.
• Bannister, K. (2004). Lessons for ABS: Academic Policies, Community Protocols and Community-level PIC. International Expert Workshop on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing, Cuernavaca, Mexico. https://polisproject.org/PDFs/Bannister%202004_ABS%20Lessons.pdf
• Bannister, K. (2009). Non-legal Instruments for Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Key Roles for Ethical Codes and Community Protocols. In C. Bell & V. Napoleon (Eds.), Protection of First Nations’ Cultural Heritage: Laws, Policy and Reform (pp. 278–308). UBC Press.
• Bannister, K. (2018). Ethical Guidance for Access and Benefit-Sharing: Implications for Reconciliation. In C. Oguamanam (Ed.), Genetic Resources, Justice and Reconciliation (1st ed., pp. 212–230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557122.013
• Bavikatte, K. S. (2014). Stewarding the Earth: Rethinking Property and the Emergence of Biocultural Rights. Oxford University Press.
• Bavikatte, K., Jonas, H., & von Braun, J. (2010). Traditional Knowledge and Economic Development: The Biocultural Dimension. In S. M. Subramanian & B. Pisupati (Eds.), Traditional Knowledge in Policy and Practice: Approaches to Development and Human Well-Being (pp. 294–326). United Nations University Press.
• Bavikatte, K. S., Robinson, D. F., & Oliva, M. J. (2015). Biocultural Community Protocols: Dialogues on the Space Within. IK: Other Ways of Knowing, 1(2), 1–31.
• Blaser, M. (2013). Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270
• Byrnes, G. (2004). The Waitangi Tribunal and New Zealand History. Oxford University Press.
• Callon, M., Barthe, Y., & Lascoumes, P. (2011). Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Ed. du Seuil.
• Calzadilla, P. V. (2019). A Paradigm Shift in Courts’ View on Nature: The Atrato River and Amazon Basin Cases in Colombia. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 15(1), 51–59.
• Cano Pecharroman, L. (2018). Rights of Nature: Rivers That Can Stand in Court. Resources, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7010013
• Chen, C. W., & Gilmore, M. (2015). Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.3.3
• Consejo Comunitario Mayor del Alto San Juan. (2012). Protocolo Comunitario Biocultural para el Territorio del Consejo Comunitario Mayor del Alto San Juan Asocasan. Tado, Chocó. ASOCOSAN, PNUMA, IIAP, Natural Justice.
• Coombe, R. J. (2011). Cultural Agencies: ‘Constructing’ Community Subjects and their Rights. In M. Biagioli, P. Jaszi, & M. Woodmansee (Eds.), Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property (pp. 79–98). University of Chicago Press.
• de Sousa Santos, B. (2006). Globalizations. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640602300268
• de Sousa Santos, B., & Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (2005). Law, politics, and the s ubaltern in counter-hegemonic globalization. In B. de Sousa Santos & C. A. Rodriguez-Garavito (Eds.), Law and Globalization from Below (1st ed., pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494093.001
• Deliege, A. (2012). Pratique économique et transactions avec les ancêtres. Études des cérémonies dans un village malgache. Presses universitaires de Louvain.
• Demeulenaere, E. (2016). Les terrains globalises de l’inscription d’un Paysage culturel. Patrimoine mondial et bioculturalite en Ethiopie. Terrains/Théories, 5, Article 5.
• Descola, P., & Sahlins, M. D. (2014). Beyond Nature and Culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.; Paperback edition). The University of Chicago Press.
• Edelman, M., Weis, T., Baviskar, A., Jr, S. M. B., Holt-Gimenez, E., Kandiyoti, D., & Wolford, W. (2014). Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Food Sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.963568
• Escobar, A. (1999). After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology, 40(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/515799
• Gavin, M. C., McCarter, J., Mead, A., Berkes, F., Stepp, J. R., Peterson, D., & Tang, R. (2015). Defining Biocultural Approaches to Conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(3), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.005
• Gilbert, J. (2016). Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights under International Law: From Victims to Actors. Brill Nijhoff.
• Graddy, T. G. (2013). Regarding Biocultural Heritage: In situ Political Ecology of Agricultural Biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(4), 587–604.
• Grear, A. (2015). Editorial: The Discourse of ‘biocultural’ Rights and the Search for New Epistemic Parameters: Moving Beyond Essentialisms and Old Certainties in an Age of Anthropocene Complexity? Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.01.00
• Grey, S. (2004). Imagination, Fraud and the Cultural Protocols Debate: A Question of Free Speech or Pornography? Media & Arts Law Review, 9(23), 23–37.
• Halewood, M., Bedmar Villanueva, A., Rasolojaona, J., Andriamahazo, M., Rakotoniaina, N., Bossou, B., Mikpon, T., Vodouhe, R., Fey, L., Drews, A., Kumar, P. L., Rasoanirina, B., Rasoazafindrabe, T., Aigbe, M., Agbahounzo, B., Otieno, G., Garforth, K., Kiene, T., & Nnadozie, K. (2021). Enhancing Farmers’ Agency in the Global Crop Commons through Use of Biocultural Community Protocols. Agriculture and Human Values, 39, 579–594.
• Hernandez Ordonez, S. R. (2019). El protocolo de Nagoya en Mexico: Un analisis legal del cumplimiento y el papel de los protocolos comunitarios bioculturales. Revista de La Facultad de Derecho de México, 69(275–2), 611. https://doi.org/10.22201/fder.24488933e.2019.275-2.69422
• Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. Calder & Boyars.
• Iorns Magallanes, C. (2019). From Rights to Responsibilities Using Legal P ersonhood and Guardianship for Rivers. In B. Martin, L. Te Aho, & M. Humphries-Kil (Eds.), ResponsAbility: Law and Governance for Living Well with the Earth (pp. 216–239). Routledge.
• Keller, E. (2008). The Banana Plant and the Moon: Conservation and the Malagasy Ethos of Life in Masoala, Madagascar. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 650–664.
• Kothari, A., Corrigan, C., Jonas, H., Neumann, A., Shrumm, H., & Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2012). Recognising and Supporting Territories and Areas Conserved by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities: Global Overview and National Case Studies. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, ICCA Consortium, Kalpavriksh, and Natural Justice. http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/242837
• Leopold, A. (1991). Conservation: In Whole or in Part? In S. L. Flader & J. B. Callicott (Eds.), The River of the Mother of God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold [1944] (pp. 310–319). The University of Wisconsin Press.
• López Barcenas, F. (2016). Análisis de los instrumentos y vacíos jurídicos para reconocer y aplicar normas, protocolos y procedimientos comunitarios. Conabio-GIZ.
• López Barcenas, F., & Espinoza Sauceda, G. (2006). Recursos geneticos y conocimiento tradicional indigena la regulacion internacional y su impacto en la legislacion mexicana. In L. Concheiro Borquez & F. Lopez Barcenas (Eds.), Biodiversidad y conocimiento tradicional en la sociedad rural: Entre el bien común y la propiedad privada (pp. 105–131). Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable y la Soberania Alimentaria.
• Magallanes, C. J. I. (2008). Reparations for Maori Grievances in Aotearoa New Zealand. In F. Lenzerini (Ed.), Reparations for Indigenous Peoples: International and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 523–564). Oxford University Press.
• Morgera, E., & Tsioumani, E. (2010). The Evolution of Benefit Sharing: Linking Biodiversity and Community Livelihoods. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 19(2), 150–173.
• Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., & Buck, M. (2014). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol: A Commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Brill; Nijhoff.
• Mulrennan, M. E., & Bussieres, V. (2020). Indigenous Environmental Stewardship: Do Mechanisms of Biodiversity Conservation Align with or Undermine It? In N. J. Turner (Ed.), Plants, People, and Places: The Roles of Ethnobotany and Ethnoecology in Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights in Canada and Beyond (pp. 282–312). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
• Munyi, P., & Jonas, H. (2013). Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in Africa: O pportunities and Challenges for African Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. In E. Morgera, M. Buck, & E. Tsioumani (Eds.), The 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing in Perspective (pp. 215–245). Brill; Nijhoff.
• Nemoga, G., Domico, J., & Molina, A. (2018). Designing Biocultural Protocols with the Embera People of Colombia. Terralingua, 7(1), 20–24.
• O’Bryan, K. (2017). Giving a Voice to the River and the Role of Indigenous People: The Whanganui River Settlement and River Management in Victoria. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 20, 48–77.
• Ogiek Peoples’ Development Program (OPDP). (2005). Ogiek Bio-Cultural Community Protocol (BCP). Safeguarding Rights and Managing Resources to Improve Livelihoods. Ogiek Peoples’ Development Program (OPDP). https://www.ogiekpeoples.org/images/downloads/Ogiek-Bio-Cultural-Protocol.pdf
• Oliva, M. J., von Braun, J., & Salinas Lanao, G. (2012). Biocultural Community Protocols and Ethical Biotrade: Exploring Participatory Approaches in Peru. In K. Swiderska (Ed.), PLA 65—Biodiversity and Culture: Exploring Community Protocols, Rights and Consent (pp. 166–172). IIED.
• Parks, L. (2018). Challenging Power from the Bottom Up? Community Protocols, Benefit-Sharing, and the Challenge of Dominant Discourses. Geoforum, 88, 87–95.
• Parks, L. (2019). Benefit-sharing in Environmental Governance: Local Experiences of a Global Concept (1st ed.). Routledge.
• Peet, R., & Watts, M. (1996). Liberation Ecology. Development, Sustainability, and Environment in an Age of Market Triumphalism. In R. Peets & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies. Environment, Development and Social Movements (pp. 1–45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203235096
• Phare, M. A., Simms, R., Brandes, O. M., & Miltenberger, M. (2018). Collaborative Consent and Water in British Columbia: Towards Watershed Co-Governance. POLIS Project on Ecological Governance and Centre for Indigenous Environmental. www.poliswaterproject.org/polis-research-publication/collaborative-consent-water-british-columbiatowards-watershed-co-governance/
• Posey, D. A. (1995). Indigenous Peoples and Traditional Resource Rights: A Basis for Equitable Relationships? Green College Centre for Environmental Policy and Understanding, University of Oxford. https://www.ecolex.org/fr/details/literature/indigenous-peoplesand-traditional-resource-rights-a-basis-for-equitable-relationships-mon-057188/
• Posey, D. A. (2001). Posey Biological and Cultural Diversity. The Inextricable, Linked by Language and Politics. In L. Maffi (Ed.), On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment (pp. 379–396). Smithsonian Institution Press.
• Posey, D. A. (2004a). Indigenous Knowledge, Biodiversity, and International Rights. Learning about Forests from the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. In K. P lenderleith (Ed.), Indigenous Knowledge and Ethics: A Darrell Posey Reader (pp. 133–140). Routledge.
• Posey, D. A. (2004b). Traditional Resources Rights – De facto Self-determination for Indigenous Peoples. In D. A. Posey & K. Plenderleith (Eds.), Indigenous Knowledge and Ethics: A Darrell Posey Reader (pp. 155–168). Routledge.
• Posey, D. A., & Dutfield, G. (1996). Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. International Development Research Centre.
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
• Radin, M. J. (1987). Market-Inalienability. Harvard Law Review, 100(8), 1849–1937.
• Raymond, H. (2007). The Ecologically Noble Savage Debate. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321
• Redford, K. H. (1991). The Ecologically Noble Savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15(1), 46–48.
• Reyes-Garcia, V., Fernandez-Llamazares, A., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Benyei, P., Bussmann, R. W., Diamond, S. K., Garcia-del-Amo, D., Guadilla-Saez, S., Hanazaki, N., Kosoy, N., Lavides, M., Luz, A. C., McElwee, P., Meretsky, V. J., Newberry, T., Molnar, Z., Ruiz-Mallen, I., Salpeteur, M., Wyndham, F. S., … Brondizio, E. S. (2021). Recognizing Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ Rights and Agency in the Post-2020 Biodiversity Agenda. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01561-7
• Roach, C. M., Hollis, T. I., McLaren, B. E., & Bavington, D. L. Y. (2006). Ducks, Bogs, and Guns: A Case Study of Stewardship Ethics in Newfoundland. Ethics & the Environment, 11(1), 43–70.
• Robinson, D. F., & Raven, M. (2020). Recognising Indigenous Customary Law of Totemic Plant Species: Challenges and Pathways. The Geographical Journal, 186(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12320
• Rodgers, C. (2017). A New Approach to Protecting Ecosystems: The Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017. Environmental Law Review, 19(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452917744909
• Rutert, B. (2020). Contested Properties. Peoples, Plants and Politics in Post-Apartheid South Africa. transcript Verlag.
• Sajeva, G. (2018). When Rights Embrace Responsibilities: Biocultural Rights and the Conservation Of Environment (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Sajeva, G. (2021). Environmentally Conditioned Human Rights. A Good Idea? In D. P. Corrigan & M. Oksanen (Eds.), Rights of Nature. A Re-examination (pp. 87–100). Routledge.
• Sarrazin, M.-L., & Scott, C. (2020). Livelihoods, Food Sovereignty, and Well-Being. Policy Brief 2: Nurturing Biocultural Diversity. https://cicada.world/files/pb/CICADA_PolicyBrief2_Livelihoods.pdf
• Save Lamu. (2018). The Lamu County Biocultural Community Protocol. The Lamu Indigenous Community and their Rights to the Preservation of their Natural Resources, Cultures, Heritage and Management of Biodiversity. Save Lamu. https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Lamu-County-BCP-2018.pdf
• Sharma, J. R. (2016). Brokering in International Development. A Consideration of Analytical Issues (New Norms and Forms of Development. Working Paper 1). School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh.
• Swiderska, K., Argumedo, A., & Pimbert, M. (2020). Biocultural Heritage Territories: Key to Halting Biodiversity Loss, IIED Briefing. iied, Asociaciόn ANDES, INMIP, Coventry University.
• The Kukula Traditional Health Practitioners Association, & Natural Justice. (2017). Biocultural Protocol of the Kukula Traditional Health Practitioners Association (2nd ed.). Kukula Traditional Health Practitioners Association; Natural Justice; Kruger to Canyons Biosphere Region. https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/bcp-kukula-traditionalhealth-practitioners-association-english.pdf
• Tonnies, F. (2001). Community and Civil Society (J. Harris, Ed.; M. Hollis, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
• Ulloa, A. (2005). The Ecological Native: Indigenous Peoples’ Movements and eco-Governmentality in Colombia. Routledge.
• Watts, M. J. (2000). Contested Communities, Malignant Markets, and Gilded Governance: Justice, Resource Extraction, and Conservation in the Tropics. In C. Zerner (Ed.), People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation (pp. 21–51). Columbia University Press.
• Zarka, Y. C. (1999). The Invention of the Subject of the Law. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(2), 245–262.