The Standards of Fairness in Digital Law: The Normative Foundations of the Data, Data Governance, Digital Services, Digital Markets and Artificial Intelligence Acts - 2025
No full text
Collective work published as editor or director (Books)
The Standards of Fairness in Digital Law: The Normative Foundations of the Data, Data Governance, Digital Services, Digital Markets and Artificial Intelligence Acts
The Standards of Fairness in Digital Law: The Normative Foundations of the Data, Data Governance, Digital Services, Digital Markets and Artificial Intelligence Acts
Aertgeerts P, ‘The constitutional implications of fundamental rights legislation in the feld of EU data protection law’ (PhD thesis, KU Leuven 2024).
Alexander Loukissas Y, All Data Are Local: Thinking critically in a data-driven society (The MIT Press 2019).
Allan T.R.S., Constitutional Justice (Oxford University Press 2001).
Amaya A, The Tapestry of Reason: an Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and its Role in Legal Argument (European Academy of Legal Theory series, Hart Publishing 2015).
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (Harvard University Press 1956; Penguin Classics 2004).
Aristotle, Politics (Batoche Books 1999).
Audi R (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press 2015).
Ausloos J, The Right to Erasure in EU Data Protection Law: From individual rights to effective protection (Oxford University Press 2020).
Bar-Gill O, Seduction by Contract: Law, Economics, and Psychology in Consumer Markets (Oxford University Press 2012).
Barocas S, Hardt M and Narayanan A, Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities (2023) https://fairmlbook.org/pdf/fairmlbook.pdf.
Beauchamp TL and Childress JF, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th edition, Oxford University Press, 2001).
Beitz CR, The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2009).
Bell M, Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union (Oxford University Press 2002).
Bentham J, The Panopticon Writings (Verso 2013).
Bentham J, A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (Baldwin et al. 1825).
Bentham J, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Kitchener 2000).
Bernard E, La spécifcité du standard juridique en droit communautaire (Bruylant 2010).
Bieker F, The Right to Data Protection: Individual and Structural Dimensions of Data Protection in EU Law (Springer e-book, 2022).
Birnbacher D, Analytische Einführung in die Ethik (De Gruyter 2013).
Birsen F, The Rise of Neo-Liberalism and the Decline of Freedom (Springer 2020).
Bonelli M, Eliantonio M and Gentile G (eds), Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protection. The Court of Justice’s Perspective, vol 1 (Hart Publishing 2022).
Bonelli M, Eliantonio M and Gentile G (eds), Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protection: The National Courts’ Perspectives, vol 2 (Hart Publishing 2023).
Bork R, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself (Basic Books 1978).
Bygrave LA, Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective (Oxford University Press 2014).
Cohen J, Confguring the Networked Self: Law, Code and the Play of Everyday Practice (Yale University Press 2012).
Darwall S, Modern Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to Kant (Cambridge University Press 2023).
De Gregorio G, Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society (Cambridge University Press 2022).
Dougan M, National Remedies Before the Court of Justice: Issues of Harmonisation and Differentiation (Hart Publishing 2004).
Ducuing C, ‘Between data markets and data protection: An assessment of the compatibility model of EU data legislation’ (PhD thesis, KU Leuven 2024).
Duke T, Building Responsible AI Algorithms: A Framework for Transparency, Fairness, Safety, Privacy and Robustness (Apress 2023).
Dupret B, Adjudication in Action. An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Judgment (Routledge 2016).
Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1978).
Eleftheriadis P, A Union of Peoples (Oxford University Press 2020).
Ellis E and Watson P, EU Anti-Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press 2012).
Estlund DM, Democratic Authority. A Philosophical Framework (Princeton University Press 2007).
Eucken W, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik (7th edn, Mohr Siebeck 2004).
Farkas L and O’Farrel O, Reversing the burden of proof: Practical dilemmas at the European and national level (Publication Offce of the European Union 2015).
Fartunova M, La preuve dans le droit de l’Union européenne (Bruylant 2013).
Feilhès L, Le principe d’équivalence en droit de l’Union européenne (Bruylant 2023).
Fikentscher W, Hacker P and Podszun R, FairEconomy: Crises, Culture, Competition and the Role of Law (Springer 2023).
Fishkin J, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press 2014).
Foucault M, Discipline and Punishment (Vintage Books 1995).
Fredman S, Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press 2011).
Friedman M, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1980).
Frischhut M, The Ethical Spirit of EU Law (Springer International Publishing 2019).
Fuller L, The Morality of Law (Yale University Press 1969).
Galligan DJ, Due Process and Fair Procedures. A Study of Administrative Procedures (Oxford University Press 1997).
Galligan DJ, Keepers of the Common Good (Oxford University Press 2024).
Geisst CR, Just Price in the Markets – A history (Yale University Press 2023).
Gillespie T, Custodians of the Internet – platforms, content moderation and the hidden decisions that shape social media (Yale University Press 2018).
González Fuster G, The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU (Springer 2014).
Grando MT, Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford University Press 2009).
Hart HLA, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Clarendon Press 1968).
Hart HLA and Honoré T, Causation in the Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012).
Hayek FA, The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press 1960).
Hayek FA, The Road to Serfdom (University of Chicago Press 1944).
Hijmans H, The European Union as a constitutional guardian of internet privacy and data protection: The story of Article 16 TFEU (Springer 2016).
Hill TE Jr., Respect, Pluralism and Justice. Kantian Perspectives (Oxford University Press 2000).
Hobbes T, Leviathan (Dent & Sons 1914).
Hood C, Rothstein H and Baldwin R, The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes (Oxford University Press 2001).
Husovec M, Principles of the Digital Services Act (Oxford University Press 2024).
James A, Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy (Oxford University Press 2013).
Kamperman Sanders A, Unfair Competition Law: The Protection of Intellectual Property and Industrial Creativity (Oxford University Press 1997).
Kant I, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge University Press 1997).
Karlsson HL, Conceptualising Procedural Fairness in EU Competition Law (Bloomsbury Publishing 2022).
Kelsen H, General Theory of Law and State (Russel & Russel 1961).
Kelsen H, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press 1967).
Kelsen H, Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy (Reidel 1973).
Kistler M, Causation and Laws of Nature (Routledge 2006).
Klamert M, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2014).
Klappstein V and Dybowski M (eds), Ratio Legis: Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives (Springer 2018).
Krenn C, The Procedural and Organisational Law of the European Court of Justice: An Incomplete Transformation(Cambridge studies in European law and policy, Cambridge University Press 2022).
Kur A, Lee N and Tischner A, Fairness in Intellectual Property Law: Searching for a Uniform Concept (Edward Elgar Publishing 2024).
Lautenbach G, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2014).
Lessay F, Souveraineté et légitimité chez Hobbes (Presses Universitaires de France 1988).
Lynksey O, The Foundations of EU Data Protection Law (Oxford University Press 2015).
Livermore MA and Rockmore DN (eds), Law as Data: Computation, Text, and the Future of Legal Analysis (Santa Fe Institute Press 2019).
Lonbay J and Biondi A, Remedies for Breach of EC Law (Wiley 1997).
MacCormick N, Practical Reason in Law and Morality (Oxford University Press 2008).
Mahlmann M, Law, Reason and Emotion (Cambridge University Press 2017).
Marmor A, Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (Clarendon Press 1995).
Mathis K and Tor A (eds), Law and Economics of Justice. Effciency, Reciprocity, Meritocracy (Springer 2024).
May L, Global Justice and Due Process (Cambridge University Press 2012).
Mestmäcker E-J, Europäische Prüfsteine der Herrschaft und des Rechts (Nomos 2016).
Mestmäcker E-J, Wettbewerb in der Privatrechtsgesellschaft (Mohr Siebeck 2019).
Micheli M and others, Mapping the landscape of data intermediaries: Emerging models for more inclusive data governance (Publications Offce of the European Union 2023).
Miksch L, Wettbewerb als Aufgabe: die Grundsätze einer Wettbewerbsordnung (Kohlhammer 1937).
Molinier J, Les principes fondateurs de l’Union européenne (Droit et justice, Presses Universitaires de France 2005).
Moore MS, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics (Oxford University Press 2009).
Mulgan R, Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies (Springer 2003).
Müller-Armack A, Genealogie der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft (P Haupt 1981).
Mu ̈ller-Terpitz R and Ko ̈hler MR, Digital Services Act: Gesetz über digitale Dienste. Kommentar (C.H. Beck 2024).
Mulligan T, Justice and the Meritocratic State (Taylor & Francis 2018).
Neff SC (ed.), Hugo Grotius. On the Law of War and Peace (Cambridge University Press 2013).
Olsen JP, Democratic Accountability, Political Order, and Change: Exploring Accountability Processes in an Era of European Transformation (Oxford University Press 2017).
Perelman C, Traité de l’argumentation: la Nouvelle Rhétorique (Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles 2008).
Petit N, Big Tech and the Digital Economy: The Moligopoly Scenario (Oxford University Press 2020).
Plato, Laws. Books I-II (Oxford University Press 2012).
Posner R, Antitrust Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2001).
Posner R, Economic Analysis of Law (9th edn, Aspen Publishing 2014).
Ratner SR, The Thin Justice of International Law: A Moral Reckoning of the Law of Nations (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2015).
Rawls J, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press 1971; 1999).
Rawls J, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (The Belknap Press 2001; Cambridge University Press 2004).
Reed C, AI Fairness and Beyond: Law, Regulation, and Technology (Hart Publishing 2024).
Rescher N, Plausible Reasoning: An introduction to the theory and practice of plausibilistic inference (Assen 1976).
Ricks M and others, Networks, Platforms and Utilities Law & Policy (Vanderbilt NPU Network 2022).
Schumpeter JA, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (Harper & Brothers 1942).
Sellers M, Law, Reason and Emotion (Cambridge University Press 2017).
Sen A, Inequality Reexamined (Oxford University Press 2006).
Shaw RM, Ethics, Moral Life and the Body (Palgrave Macmillan 2015).
Sikka S, Heidegger, Morality and Politics: Questioning the Shepherd of Being (Cambridge University Press 2017).
Simmonds NE, Law as Moral Idea (Oxford University Press 2007).
Sunstein CR, Legal Reasoning and Political Confict (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2018).
Thomas EW, The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles (Cambridge University Press 2005).
Tobler C, Limits and Potential of the Concept of Indirect Discrimination (Publication Offce of the European Union 2008).
Tridimas T, The General Principles of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007).
Untermeyer L, Robert Frost: A Backward Look (University of Michigan Library 1964).
Van Cleynenbreugel P, Plateformes en ligne et droit de l’Union européenne – un cadre juridique aux multiples visages (Bruylant 2020).
Van Duin A, Effective Judicial Protection in Consumer Litigation: Article 47 of the EU Charter in Practice (Intersentia 2022).
Varoufakis Y, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism? (Bodley Head 2023).
Westin A, Privacy and Freedom (Simon & Schuster 1967).
Westin A, Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens (U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare 1973).
Wilman F, Kale ̇da SL and Loewenthal P-J, The EU Digital Services Act: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2024).
Winner L, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology (Pantheon Books 1986).
Zuboff S, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The fght for a human future at the new frontier of power (Public Affairs 2019).
Akman P, ‘An Agenda for Competition Law and Policy in the Digital Economy’ (2019) 10(10) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 589.
Akman P, ‘Regulating Competition in Digital Platform Markets: A Critical Assessment of the Framework and Approach of the EU Digital Markets Act’ (2022) 47(1) European Law Review 85.
Allan TRS, ‘Procedural Fairness and the Duty of Respect’ (1998) 18(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 497.
Alschner W, ‘The Computational Analysis of International Law’ in Deplano Rossana and Tsagourias Nicholas (eds), Research Methods in International Law: A Handbook (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).
Amato C, ‘Product Liability and Product Security: Present and Future’ in Sebastian Lohsse, Reiner Schulze, Dirk Staudenmayer (eds), Liability for Artifcial Intelligence and the Internet of Things (Hart Publishing 2019).
Amorese M, ‘The Primacy of the European Commission in the European Competition Network as a Safeguard against national competition policies and the rejection of the ‘primus inter pares’ doctrine’ (2011) 18 Columbia Journal of European Law 177.
Andersen L, ‘Human Rights in the Age of Artifcial Intelligence’ (2018) AccessNow 6.
Anderson E, ‘What Is the Point of Equality’ (1999) 109(2) Ethics 287.
Anderson E, ‘The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians’ in Alexander Kaufman (ed.), Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage. G.A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism (Cambridge University Press 2015).
Anderson E, ‘The Epistemology of Justice’ (2020) 58(1) The Southern Journal of Philosophy 6.
Andriychuk O, ‘The Digital Markets Act Proposal: Key Elements & Smart Features’ (2022) 43(3) European Competition Law Journal 112.
Andriychuk O, ‘Do DMA obligations for gatekeepers create entitlements for business users?’ (2023) 11 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 123–132.
Angelopoulos C and Smet S, ‘Notice-and-fair-balance: how to reach a compromise between fundamental rights in European intermediary liability’ (2016) 8 Journal of Media Law 266.
Appelman N and others, ‘Access to Digital Justice: In Search of an Effective Remedy for Removing Unlawful Online Content’ in X Kramer and others (eds), Frontiers in Civil Justice: Privatisation, Monetisation and Digitisation (Edward Elgar Publishing 2022) 217.
Arnull A, ‘Remedies Before National Courts’ in Schütze R and Tridimas T (eds), Oxford Principles of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order (Oxford University Press 2018).
Arnull A, ‘Article 47 CFR and National Procedural Autonomy’ (2020) 45 European Law Review 681.
Arvidsson A, ‘Facebook and Finance: On the Social Logic of the Derivative’ (2016) 33(6) Theory, Culture & Society 3.
Autor D and others, ‘The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms’ (2020) 135(2) The Quarterly Journal of Economics 645.
Baker JB and Chevalier JA, ‘The Competitive Consequences of Most-Favored-Nation Provisions’ (2013) 27(2) Antitrust 20.
Banteka N, ‘Theory of Constructive Interpretation for Customary International Law Identifcation’ (2018) 39 Michigan Journal of International Law 301.
Baumol WJ, ‘Contestable Markets – An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure’ (1982) 72(1) American Economic Review 1.
Bayefsky R, ‘Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights’ (2013) 41(6) Political Theory 775.
Beatriz K, Sinha V and Srinivasan S, ‘Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection’ (2021) 30(5) Industrial and Corporate Change 1337.
Bell E, ‘An Introduction to Judicial Fact-Finding’ (2013) 39(3) Commonwealth Law Bulletin 519.
Berger Skrk A, ‘Effet utile and national practice: is there a room for improvement?’ (2014) 1 InterEULawEast: Journal for the international and European law, economics and market integrations 113.
Berk R and others, ‘Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment: The State of the Art’ (2021) 50(1) Sociological Methods & Research 3.
Bertoloni A and Episcopo F, ‘The Expert Groups Report on Liability for Artifcial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies: a critical assessment’ (2021) 12(3) European Journal of Risk Regulation 644.
Besson S, ‘General Principles in International Law – Whose Principles?’ in Besson Samantha, Pichonnaz Pascal and Gächter-Alge Marie-Louise (eds), Les principes en droit européen – Principles in European law (Schulthess 2011).
Besson S, ‘The Law in Human Rights Theory’ (2013) 7 Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte–Journal for Human Rights 120.
Besson S, ‘Moral Philosophy and International Law’ in Anne Orford and Florian Hoffmann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford University Press 2016).
Bickel PJ, Hammel EA and O’Connell JW, ‘Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data from Berkeley’ (1975) 187(4175) Science 398.
Bilal Zafar M and others, ‘Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classifcation without Disparate Mistreatment’ (2017) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08452.
Bilal Zafar M and others, ‘Fairness Constraints: Mechanisms for Fair Classifcation’ (2017) 54 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artifcial Intelligence and Statistics (PMLR) 962.
Binns R, ‘Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason’ (2018) 31 Philosophy & Technology 543.
Binns R, ‘Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy’ (2018) 81 Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 1.
Binns R, ‘On the Apparent Confict Between Individual and Group Fairness’ in Mireille Hildebrandt and others (eds), FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery 2020) 514–524.
Black E, Gillis T and Hall ZY, ‘D-Hacking’ in Reuben Binns and others(eds), Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery 2024) 602–615.
Black J, ‘Regulatory conversations’ (2002) 29(1) Journal of Law and Society 163.
Blockx J, ‘Effet utile Reasoning by the Court of Justice is Mostly Indirect: Evidence and Consequences’ (2022) 14 European Journal of Legal Studies 141.
Bobek M, ‘Why there is no principle of ‘procedural autonomy’ of the Member States’ in Bruno De Witte and Hans Micklitz (eds), The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States (Intersentia 2012).
Bobocel DR and Gosse L, ‘Procedural justice: A Historical Review and Critical Analysis’ in Russel S. Cropanzan and Maureen L. Ambrose (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press 2015) 51–88.
Böhm F, ‘Entmachtung durch Wettbewerb’ in Traugott Roser and Walter Oswalt (eds), Entmachtung durch Wettbewerb (Walter Eucken Archiv 2007).
Bonelli M, ‘Effective Judicial Protection in EU Law: an Evolving Principle of a Constitutional Nature’ (2019) 12 Review of European Administrative Law 35.
Borgogno O and Colangelo G, ‘Disentangling the FRAND Conundrum’ (2019) DEEP-IN Research Paper https://ssrn.com/abstract=3498995.
Bostoen F, ‘Understanding the Digital Markets Act’ (2023) 68(2) The Antitrust Bulletin 263.
Botta M, ‘Sanctioning unfair pricing under Art. 102(a) TFEU: yes, we can!’ (2021) 17 European Competition Journal 156.
Bousta R, ‘Who Said There is a “Right to a Good Administration”? A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ (2013) 19 European Public Law 481.
Bovens M, ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’ (2007) 13(4) European Law Journal 447.
Bovens M, Schillemans T and Hart P, ‘Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool’ (2008) 86(1) Public Administration 225.
Bovens M, ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’ (2010) 33(5) West European Politics 946.
Bratu I, ‘A frst critical analysis of the European approach to damage caused by artifcial intelligence enabled by global navigation satellite systems. A bridge to nowhere or a cloud with a silver lining’ (2023) 37(2) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 147.
Brey P, ‘Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics’ in Luciano Floridi (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Information & Computer Ethics (Cambridge University Press 2010).
Brkan M and Imamovi S, ‘Article 52: Twenty-Eight Shades of Interpretation?’ in Bobek M and Adams-Prassl J (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Member States (Hart Publishing 2020).
Brown JM, ‘Relational Equality and Disability Injustice’ (2019) 16 Journal of Moral Philosophy 327.
Brown R, ‘The Possibility of “Inference Causation”: Inferring Cause-in-Fact and the Nature of Legal Fact-Finding’ (2010) 55(1) McGill Law Journal 1.
Budzinski O and J Mendelsohn, ‘Regulating Big Tech: From Competition Policy to Sector Regulation?’ (2023) 72-73(1) ORDO 215.
Buffard I and Zemanek K, ‘The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) Austrian Review of International and European Law Online 311.
Buijsman S, ‘Navigating fairness measures and trade-offs’ (2024) 4 AI and Ethics 1323.
Buiten M, de Streel A and Peitz M, ‘The law and economics of AI liability’ (2023) 38 Computer Law & Security Review, Article n° 105794.
Busuioc M, ‘Accountable Artifcial Intelligence: Holding Algorithms to Account’ (2021) 81(5) Public Administration Review 825.
Bygrave LA, ‘Information Concepts in Law: Generic Dreams and Defnitional Daylight’ (2015) 35(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 91–120.
Cabral L and others, ‘The EU Digital Markets Act: A Report from a Panel of Economic Experts’ (Publication Offce of the European Union 2021) 1–15.
Carey AN and Wu X, ‘The statistical fairness feld guide: perspectives from social and formal sciences’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 1.
Carovano G and Finck M, ‘Regulating data intermediaries: the impact of the Data Governance Act on the EU’s data economy’ (2023) 50 Computer Law & Security Review 1.
Carovano G and Meinke A, ‘Improving Fairness and Cybersecurity in the Artifcial Intelligence Act’, Jose M. Alvarez and others (eds), Proceedings of the EWAF’ 23: European Workshop on Algorithmic Fairness, 7–9 June 2023, Winterthur, Switzerland (CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2023) https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3442/paper-43.pdf.
Carreiro AV and others, ‘The Matrix Reloaded: A Counterfactual Perspective in Bias in Machine Learning’ in Andreas Krause and others (eds), Data-centric Machine Learning Research (DMLR) Workshop at the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 2023) 1–10.
Caton S and Haas C, ‘Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey’ (2024) 56(7) ACM Computing Surveys 1.
Cauffman C and Goanta C, ‘A new order: the Digital Services Act and consumer protection’ (2021) 12 European Journal of Risk Regulation 758.
Cavoukian A, ‘Privacy by design: the defnite workshop’ (2010) 3 IDIS 247.
Chamberlain J, ‘The Risk-Based Approach of the European Union’s Proposed Artifcial Intelligence Regulation: Some Comments from a Tort Law Perspective’ (2023) 14(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 1.
Chapman JW, ‘Justice and Fairness’ (1963) 6 NOMOS: American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy 147.
Charpentier A, ‘Quantifying Fairness and Discrimination in Predictive Models’ in Vladik Kreinivich, Songsak Sriboonchitta and Woraphon Yamaka (eds), Machine Learning for Econometrics and Related Topics (Springer 2024) 37–77.
Charpentier A, Flachaire A and Gallic E, ‘Optimal Transport for Counterfactual Estimation: A Method for Causal Inference’ in Nguyen Ngoc Thach and others (eds), Optimal Transport Statistics for Economics and Related Topics (Springer 2024) 45–89.
Cheffns BR, ‘History and Turning the Antitrust Page’ (2012) 95(4) Business History Review 805.
Chen Z and others, ‘Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends’ (2024) 33(5) ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 1.
Cheng EK and Pardo MS, ‘Accuracy, optimality and the preponderance standard’ (2015) 14(3) Law, Probability and Risk 193.
Cherednychenko O, ‘Private enforcement of EU law’ in Scholten M (ed.), Research Handbook on the Enforcement of EU Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023).
Chiarella ML, ‘Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA): New Rules for the EU Digital Environment’ (2022) 9 Athens Journal of Law 33.
Chilton A and Tingley D, ‘Why the Study of International Law Needs Experiments’ (2013) 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 173.
Chouldechova A, ‘Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments’ (2017) 5(2) Big Data 153.
Christof A and others, ‘Erosion by Standardisation: Is ISO/IEC 29134:2017 on Privacy Impact Assessment Up to (GDPR) Standard?’ in Research Anthology on Privatizing and Securing Data (2021) 1793–1795.
Clifford D and Ausloos J, ‘Data Protection and the Role of Fairness’ (2018) 37 Yearbook of European Law 130.
Cohen GA, ‘Rescuing Justice from Constructivism and Equality from the Basic Structure Restriction’ in Gerald A. Cohen and Michael Otzuka (eds), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy (Princeton University Press 2011).
Colangelo G, ‘Antitrust Unchained: The EU’s Case Against Self-Preferencing’ (2023) 72(6) GRUR International 538–556.
Colangelo G, ‘In Fairness We (Should Not) Trust: The Duplicity of the EU Competition Policy Mantra in Digital Markets’ (2023) 68(4) The Antitrust Bulletin 618.
Cole M and Hartmann S, ‘Ordoliberalism: What We Know and What We Think We Know’ (2023) 86(6) Modern Law Review 1309.
Colino SM, ‘The Antitrust F Word: Fairness Considerations in Competition Law’ (2019) Journal of Business Law 329.
Comandé G and Schneider G, ‘It’s time. Leveraging the GDPR to shift the balance towards research-friendly EU data spaces’ (2022) 59 Common Market Law Review.
Corbett-Davis S and others, ‘Algorithmic Decision-Making and the Cost of Fairness’ in Stan Matwin, Shipeng Yu and Faisal Farooq (eds), KDD ’17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery 2017) 797.
Cossette-Lefebvre H and Maclure J, ‘AI’s fairness problem: understanding wrongful discrimination in the context of automated decision-making’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 1255.
Cotterrell R, ‘Justice, Dignity, Torture, Headscarves: Can Durkheim’s Sociology Clarify Legal Values?’ (2011) 20(1) Social & Legal Studies 3.
Crane D, ‘How Much Brandeis Do the Neo-Brandeisians Want?’ (2019) 64(4) The Antitrust Bulletin 531.
Craufurd SR, ‘Remedies for Breaches of EU Law in National Courts: Legal Variation and Selection’ in Craig P and De Búrca G (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (1st edn, Oxford University Press 1999).
Crémer J and others, ‘Fairness and Contestability in the Digital Markets Act’ (2023) 40(3) Yale Journal on Regulation 973.
Custers B, ‘Reconsidering discrimination grounds in the data economy: An EU comparison of national constitutions’ (2023) 50 Computer Law & Security Review 1.
Custers B, ‘A fair trial in complex technology cases: Why courts and judges need a basic understanding of complex technologies’ (2024) 52 Computer Law & Security Review, Article n° 105935.
D’Amico AS and Balasingham B, ‘Super-dominant and super-problematic? The degree of dominance in the Google Shopping judgement’ (2022) 18(3) European Competition Journal 614.
D’Amico AS, D Pelekis, C Santos and B Duivenvoorde‚ ‘Meta’s Pay-or-Okay Model: An Analysis Under EU Data Protection, Consumer, and Competition Law’ (2024) Utrecht University School of Law Research Paper www.uu.nl/sites/default/fles/rebo-renforce-working-paper-2024-Meta%27s%20Pay-or-Okay%20Model%20-%20An%20Analysis%20Under%20EU%20Data%20Protection%2C%20Consumer%2C%20and%20Competition%20Law.pdf.
Dagan H, ‘Why Markets? Welfare, Autonomy and the Just Society’ (2019) 117(6) Michigan Law Review 1289.
Daniels N, ‘Refective Equilibrium’ (2011) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Das Jui T and Rivas P, ‘Fairness issues, current approaches, and challenges in machine learning model’ (2024) 15 International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 3095.
De Cooman J, ‘Ethique et intelligence artifcielle: l’exemple européen’ (2020) 1 Revue de la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Liège 79.
De Gregorio G and Demková S, ‘The Constitutional Right to an Effective Remedy in the Digital Age: A Perspective from Europe’ in van Oirsouw C and others (eds), European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2023: Constitutional Law in the Digital Era (DAsser Press 2024).
Del Moral Sánchez M, ‘The Devil is in the Procedure: Private Enforcement in the DMA and the DSA’ (2024) 9(1) University of Bologna Law Review 7–44.
den Heijer M, van Os van den Abeleen T and Antanina M, ‘On the Use and Misuse of Recitals In European Union Law’ (2019) Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No 2019-31.
Dobbe R, Krendl Gilbert T and Mintz Y, ‘Hard choices in artifcial intelligence’ (2021) 300 Artifcial Intelligence, Article n° 103555.
Dougan M, ‘The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law Before The National Courts’ in Craig P and De Búrca G (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2011).
Douville T, ‘Articles 4, 5 et 6’ in Brunessen Bertrand (ed.), Règlement DSA 2022/20265 relatif à un marché unique des services numériques. Commentaire article par article (Bruylant 2024).
Ducuing C, ‘The Broadband Cost Reduction Directive: A Legal Primer in Cross-Sector Regulation of Infrastructures’ (2021) 22(1) Competition and Regulation in Network Industries.
Ducuing C and others, ‘White Paper on the Data Act Proposal’ (CiTiP Working Paper 2022, 10 November 2022).
Ducuing C, ‘An analysis of IoT data regulation under the Data Act proposal through property law lenses’ (2022) SSRN Working Paper.
Ducuing C, ‘The Regulation of Data in the European Union: The Data Governance Act and the Data Act’ in Eylül Erva Akin, Simona Klimbacher and Giovanni Ziccardi (eds), Smart Cities, Artifcial Intelligence and Digital Transformation Law: A Handbook for Students and Professionals (Milano University Press 2024).
Duede E, ‘Instruments, agents and artifcial intelligence: novel epistemic categories of reliability’ (2022) 6 Synthèse 1.
Dunne N, ‘The Role of Private Enforcement within EU Competition Law’ (2014) 16 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 143–187.
Dunne N, ‘Fairness and the Challenge of Making Markets Work Better’ (2020) 84(2) The Modern Law Review 230.
Durante M and Floridi L, ‘A Legal Principles-Based Framework for AI Liability Regulation’ in Jakob Mökander and Marta Ziosi (eds), The 2021 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Labs (Springer 2022) 93–112.
Dwork C and others, ‘Fairness through awareness’ in Saf Goldwasser (ed.), ITCS ’12: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (Association for Computing Machinery 2012) 214.
Dworkin R, ‘What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’ (1981) 10–3 Philosophy & Public Affairs, 185.
Ebers M, ‘The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artifcial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)’ (2021) 4(4) Multidisciplinary Scientifc Journal 589.
Ebers M, ‘Standardizing AI: The Case of the European Commission’s Proposal for an “Artifcial Intelligence Act”’ in Larry A. DiMatteo, Cristina Poncibo and Michel Cannarsa (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Artifcial Intelligence: Global Perspectives on Law and Ethics (Cambridge University Press 2022) 321–344.
Eckardt M and Kerber W, ‘Property rights theory, bundles of rights on IoT data, and the EU Data Act’, (2024) 57 European Journal of Law and Economics 113–143.
Ehlermann CD, ‘Refections on a European Cartel Offce’ (1995) 32 Common Market Law Review 471–486.
Eifert M and others, ‘Taming the Giants: The DMA/DSA Package’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 987.
Eliantonio M and Medzmariashvili M, ‘Hybridity Under Scrutiny: How European Standardisation Shakes the Foundations of EU Constitutional and Internal Market Law’ (2017) 44(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 323.
Eliantonio M and Muir E, ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: under strain?’ (2019) 2 Review of European Administrative Law 255–265.
Episcopo F, ‘Judicial Law-Making and the Principle of Effectiveness in EU (Private) Law’ (2019) Revista Catalana de Dret Privat 53.
Episcopo F, ‘The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law Before National Courts’ in Craig P and de Búrca G (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2021).
Episcopo F, ‘The Vicissitudes of Life at the Coalface: Remedies and Procedures for Enforcing Union Law before the National Courts’ in Paul Craig and Grainné De Búrca (ed.), The Evolution of EU law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2021).
Episcopo F, ‘Deconstructing the CJEU’s Jurisprudence to Enable Judicial Dialogue. A Plea for a Critical and Linguistic Approach Towards Judicial Harmonization’ in Mak C and Kas B (eds), Civil Courts and the European Polity: The constitutional role of private law adjudication in Europe (Hart Publishing 2023).
Episcopo F, ‘Varieties of effectiveness and their impact on private law adjudication’ (2023) 31 Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht 350.
Episcopo F, ‘“Play it again, Sam”: Remedying Procedural Discrimination in Social Security in TGSS’ (2024) Common Market Law Review 1077.
Erva Akin E, Klimbacher S, and Ziccardi G, ‘The Regulation of Data in the European Union: the Data Governance Act and the Data Act’ in Eylül Erva Akin, Simona Klimbacher and Giovanni Ziccardi (eds) Smart Cities, Artifcial Intelligence and Digital Transformation Law: A Handbook for Students and Professionals (Milano University Press 2024).
Estlund D, ‘Epistemic Proceduralism and Democratic Authority’ in Raf Geenens and Ronald Tinnevelt (eds), Does Truth Matter? (Springer 2009).
Fairgrieve D and Salim R, ‘Collective redress in Europe: Moving forward or treading water?’ (2022) 71 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 465.
Fallon R, ‘Arguing in Good Faith about the Constitution: Ideology, Methodology, and Refective Equilibrium’ (2017) 84 University of Chicago Law Review 123.
Ferrara E, ‘Fairness and Bias in Artifcial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies’ (2023) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07683.
Fia T, ‘Fairness in market instrumental data governance’ (2024) SSRN Working Paper.
Figueiredo Nobre Brito Cortese J and others, ‘Should explainability be a ffth ethical principle in AI ethics?’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 123.
Finck M, ‘The Maturation of European Data Law: From Fundamental Rights to Economic Rights’ in Jeremias Adams-Prassl and others (eds), The Internal Market Ideal: Essays in Honour of Stephen Weatherill (Oxford University Press 2024).
Fjeld J and others, ‘Principled Artifcial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI’ (2020) The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series No. 2020-01.
Floridi L, ‘Establishing the Rules for Building Trustworthy AI’ (2019) 1 Nature Machine Intelligence 261.
Floridi L, ‘Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical’ (2019) 32 Philosophy & Technology 185.
Floridi L, ‘The End of an Era: from Self-Regulation to Hard Law for the Digital Industry’ (2021) 34 Philosophy & Technology 61.
Floridi L and Cowls J, ‘A Unifed Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society’ in Silvio Carta (ed.), Machine Learning and the City: Applications in Architecture and Urban Design (John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2022) 535–545.
Fox EM, ‘Against Goals’ (2013) 81(5) Fordham Law Review 2157.
Franck TM, ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 715.
Frankenreiter J and Livermore MA, ‘Computational Methods in Legal Analysis’ (2020) 16 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 39.
Frosio G and Geiger C, ‘Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act’s platform liability regime’ (2023) 29 European Law Journal 31–77.
G’sell F, ‘The Digital Services Act: a general assessment’ in Antje von Urgen-Sternberg (ed.), Content Regulation in the European Union – The Digital Services Act (Verein für Recht und Digitalisierung e.V. Institute for Digital Law Trier 2023).
Gajane P and Pechenizkiy M, ‘On formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine Learning’ (2018) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.03184.
Gasper D, ‘Logos, pathos and ethos in Martha C. Nussbaum’s capabilities approach to human development’ in Flavio Comim and Martha C. Nussbaum (eds) Capabilities, Gender, equality. Towards Fundamental Entitlements (Cambridge University Press 2014).
Geiregat S, ‘The Data Act: Start of a new era for data ownership?’ (2022) SSRN working paper.
Gentile G, ‘Effective judicial protection: enforcement, judicial federalism and the politics of EU law’ (2023) 2 European Law Open 128.
Georgiou C, ‘Unconditional Communist Equality among Individuals: Beyond Marxist Equality Limited to the Abolition of Classes’ (2016) 44(1–2) Critique 129.
Geradin D, ‘The Meaning of ‘Fair and Reasonable’ in the Context of Third-Party Determination of FRAND Terms’ (2014) George Mason Law Review 919.
Geradin D and Katsifs D, ‘The Antitrust Case against the Apple App Store (Revisited)’ (2020) TILEC Discussion Paper No DP2020-035.
Gerard D, ‘Fairness in EU Competition Policy: Signifcance and Implications’ (2018) 9(4) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 211.
Gerbrandy A and Phoa P, ‘The Power of Big Tech Corporations as Modern Bigness and a Vocabulary for Shaping Competition Law as Counter-Power’ in Michael Bennett, Huub Brouwer and Rutger Claasen (eds), Wealth and Power (Routledge 2022).
Gianclaudio M, ‘The Concept of Fairness in the GDPR: a Linguistic and Contextual Interpretation’ (2020) Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 154.
Giannini A and Kwik J, ‘Negligence Failures and Negligence Fixes. A Comparative Analysis of Criminal Regulation of AI and Autonomous Vehicles’ (2023) 34 Criminal Law Forum 43.
Gibson J, ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’ (1989) 23–3 Law & Society Review, 469–496.
Giovanala B and Tiribelli S, ‘Beyond bias and discrimination: redefning the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms’ (2022) 38 AI & Society 549.
Gnes M, ‘Do Administrative Law Principles Apply to European Standardization: Agencifcation or Privatization’ (2017) 44(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 367.
Goanta C and Ortolani P, ‘Unpacking Content Moderation: The Rise of Social Media Platforms as Online Civil Courts’ in Kramer X, Hoevenaars J and Kas B (eds), Frontiers in Civil Justice (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021).
Göhsl J-F, ‘Das Google-Datenverfahren – ein Verfahren mit Signalwirkung, auch für den DMA’ (2023) 73(12) Wirschaft und Wettbewerb 659.
Gonzalez-Sendino R, Serrano E and Bajo J, ‘Mitigating bias in artifcial intelligence: Fair data generation via causal models for transparent and explainable decisionmaking’ (2024) 155 Future Generation Computer Systems 384.
Gornacchia G and others, ‘Counterfactual Fair Opportunity: Measuring Decision Model Fairness with Counterfactual Reasoning’ (2023) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08158.
Gornacchia G and others, ‘Counterfactual Reasoning for Bias Evaluation and Detection in a Fairness under Unawareness Setting’ (2023) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08204.
Graef I, Clifford D and Valcke P, ‘Fairness and Enforcement: Bridging Competition, Data Protection, and Consumer Law’ (2018) 8 International Data Privacy Law 200.
Griffn, ‘Procedural Fetishism in the Digital Service Act’ (2025) European Journal of Legal Studies 11.
Grozdanovski L, ‘Le probable, le plausible et le vrai. Contribution à la théorie générale de la présomption en droit’ (2020) 84(1) Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 39.
Grozdanovski L, ‘In search for effectiveness and fairness in proving algorithmic discrimination in EU law’ (2021) 58(1) Common Market Law Review 99.
Grozdanovski L, ‘L’agentivité algorithmique, fction futuriste ou impératif de justice procédurale? Réfexions sur l’avenir du régime de responsabilité du fait de produits défectueux dans l’Union européenne’ (2022) 40(232/233) Réseaux 99.
Grozdanovski L and De Cooman J, ‘Forget the Facts, Aim for the Rights! On the Obsolescence of Empirical Knowledge in Defning the Risk/Rights-Based Approach to AI Regulation in the European Union’ (2023) 49(2) Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 207.
Grozdanovski L, ‘Evidence as enabler – or flter – of actions brought by private parties directly before the EU Courts’ in Melanie Fink (ed.), Access to Justice and the EU’s Remedies System. Mechanisms to Redress Human Rights Violations by the EU (Cambridge University Press 2024) 64.
Grozdanovski L, ‘The Explanations One Needs for the Explanations One Gives. The Necessity of Explainable AI (XAI) for Causal Explanations of AI-related harm –Deconstructing the “Refuge of Ignorance” in the EU’s AI Liability Regulation’ (2024) 2 International Journal of Law, Ethics & Technology 155.
Guastini R, ‘Les principes de droit en tant que source de perplexité théorique’ in Caudal-Sizaret Sylvie (ed.), Les principes en droit (Economica 2008).
Gutiérrez G and Philippon T, ‘Ownership, Concentration and Investment’ (2018) 108 AEA Papers and Proceedings 432.
Gutman K, ‘The Essence of the Fundamental Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Best Is Yet to Come?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 884.
Gutman K, ‘Article 47: The Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial’ in Bobek M and Adams-Prassl J (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Member States (Hart Publishing 2020).
Haack S, ‘On Logic in the Law: Something, but not all’ (2007) 20(1) Ratio Juris 1.
Haack S, ‘Correlation and causation. The “Bradford Hill criteria” in epidemiological, legal and epistemological perspective’ in Miguel Martin-Casals and Diego M. Papayannis (eds), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge University Press 2015).
Haapaniemi P, ‘Procedural Autonomy: A Misnomer?’ in Laura Ervo, Minna Gräns and Antti Jokela (ed.), The Europeanization of Procedural Law and New Challenges to a Fair Trial (Europa Law Publishing 2009).
Hacker P, ‘Teaching fairness to artifcial intelligence: Existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law’ (2018) 55(4) Common Market Law Review 1143.
Hacker P, Cordes J and Rochon J, ‘Regulating Gatekeeper Artifcial Intelligence and Data: Transparency, Access and Fairness under the Digital Markets Act, the General Data Protection Regulation, and Beyond’ (2024) 15(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 49.
Hagemann R, Huddleston J and Thierer AD, ‘Soft Law for Hard Problems: The Governance of Emerging Technologies in an Uncertain Future’ (2018) 17 Colorado Technology Law Journal 37.
Hagendorff T, ‘The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines’ (2020) 30 Minds and Machine 99.
Hardt M, Price E and Srebro N, ‘Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning’ in Daniel D. Li and others (eds), 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc. 2016) 1–9.
Havu K, ‘EU Law in Member State Courts: “Adequate Judicial Protection” and Effective Application – Ambiguities and Nonsequiturs in Guidance by the Court of Justice?’ (2016) 8 Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice 158–187.
Helberger N and others, ‘Towards Digital Fairness’ (2024) 13(1) Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 24–30.
Herlin-Karnell E and Theodore K, ‘The Rise and Expressions of Consistency in EU Law: Legal and Strategic Implications for European Integration’ (2013) 15 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 139.
Hettne J, ‘Standards, Barriers to Trade and EU Internal Market Rules: Need for a Renewed Approach?’ (2017) 44(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 409.
Hoffman AL, ‘Where Fairness Fails: Data, Algorithms, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Discourse’ (2019) 22(7) Information, Communication & Society 900.
Hoffmann LJ, ‘Fairness in the Digital Markets Act’ (2023) 8(1) European Papers 17.
Hoofnagle CJ, van der Sloot B and Zuiderveen Borgesius F, ‘The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means’ (2019) 28(1) Information & Communications Technology Law 65.
Hornung G and Spieker gen. Döhmann I, ‘The systematics of secondary European data protection law’ in Indra Spieker gen. Döhmann, Vagelis Papakonstantinou, Gerrit Hornung and Paul De Hert, General Data Protection Regulation: Article-by-Article Commentary (Nomos 2023).
Hornung P, ‘The Ecosystem Concept, the DMA, and Section 19a GWB’ (2023) 12(3) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 396.
Hough M and others, ‘Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy’ (2010) 4(3) Policing 203.
Hovenkamp H, ‘The Invention of Antitrust’ (2023) 96 Southern California Law Review 129.
Hovenkamp H and Scott Morton FM, ‘Framing the Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis’ (2020) 168 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1843.
Howard E, ‘EU anti-discrimination law: Has the CJEU stopped moving forward?’ (2018) 18(1–2) International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 60–81.
Huan W and others, ‘Fairness through Equality of Effort’ in Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni and others (eds), WWW’ 20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 (Association for Computing Machinery 2020) 743–751.
Huff C and Cooper J, ‘Sex Bias in Educational Software: The Effect of Designers’ Stereotypes on the Software They Design’ (1987) 17(6) Journal of Applied Social Psychology 519.
Husovec M, ‘Rising above liability: The Digital Services Act as a blueprint for the second generation of global internet rules’ (2023) 38 Berkeley Journal of Law and Technology 883–920.
Husovec M, ‘Will the DSA Work: On Money and Effort’ in Joris van Hoboken and others (eds), Putting the Digital Services Act into Practice: Enforcement, Access to Justice, and Global Implications(Verfassungblog GmbH 2023) 19–33.
Hutchinson B and Mitchell M, ‘50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning’ (2019) Proceedings of the Conference in Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 49.
Huting S, ‘Het behoorlijkheidsbeginsel in het gegevensbeschermingsrecht: nieuwe uitleg in bindende besluiten van de EDPB’ (2023) 3 Privacy & Informatie 98–103.
Ilmari Niemi M, ‘Facts, Fictions or Reasoning. Law as the Subject Matter of Jurisprudence’ (2003) 1(16) Ratio Juris 1.
Irwin DA, ‘Adam Smith’s ‘tolerable administration of justice’ and the Wealth of Nations’ (2020) 67 Scottish Journal of Political Economy 231.
Isidro MR, ‘Procedural Harmonisation and Private Enforcement in the GDPR’ in Inchausti FG and Hess B (eds), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure: Coordination or Harmonisation? (Intersentia 2020).
Jacobides MG and Lianos I, ‘Ecosystems and Competition Law in Theory and Practice’ (2021) 30(5) Industrial and Corporate Change 1199.
Jasanoff S, ‘Imagined worlds. The politics of future-making in the twenty-frst century’ in Andreas Wenger, Ursula Jasper, Myriam Dunn Cavelty (eds) The Politics and Science of Prevision: Governing and Probing the Future (Routledge 2020) 27.
Jaursch J, ‘Platform oversight – Here is what a strong Digital Services Coordinator should look like’ in Joris van Hoboken and others (ed.) Putting the DSA into practice – Enforcement, Access to Justice and Global Implications(Verfassungsbooks 2022) 91–106.
Jenny F, ‘Changing the way we think: competition, platforms and ecosystems’ (2021) 9(1) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 1.
Jobin A, Ienca M and Vayena E, ‘The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines’ (2019) 1 Nature Machine Intelligence 389.
Jonas DS and Saunders TN, ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: Three Interpretive Methods’ (2010) 43 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 566.
Jong Pak U, ‘Judicial Justice: From Procedural Justice to Communicative Justice’ (2016) 16(1) Journal of Korean Law, 147.
Jorgensen AK and Sogaard A, ‘Rawlsian AI fairness loopholes’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 1185.
Jouanjan O, ‘Logiques de l’égalité’ in Constitutionnel Conseil (ed.), Le Principe d’égalité (2020).
Jung C and others, ‘Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behavior’ (2020) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07147.
Kalimo H and Majcher K, ‘The concept of fairness: linking EU competition and data protection law in the digital marketplace’ (2017) 42(2) European Law Review 210–233.
Kamiran F, Žliobaitė I and Calders T, ‘Quantifying explainable discrimination and removing illegal discrimination in automated decision making’ (2013) 35 Knowledge and Information Systems 613.
Kattnig M and others, ‘Assessing trustworthy AI: Technical and legal perspectives of fairness in AI’ (2024) 55 Computer Law & Security Review 1.
Keith J, ‘Culture and organizational justice: State of the literature and suggestions for future directions’ in Russel S. Cropanzan and Maureen L. Ambrose (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press 2015) 273–290.
Kerber W and K K Zolna, ‘The German Facebook case: the law and economics of the relationship between competition and data protection law’ (2022) 54 European Journal of Law and Economics 217–250.
Kianzad B, ‘Beyond Justice Versus Effciency: Reconciling Law and Economics Approaches to Fairness’ in Klaus Mathis, Avishalom Tor (eds), Law and Economics of Justice. Effciency, Reciprocity, Meritocracy (Springer 2024) 111.
Kianzad B, ‘Fairness, Data, and Competition Law: Reconciling Fairness Norms in DMA, Data Act and AI Act with EU Competition Law’ (2025) SSRN Working Paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=5030204.
Kim PT, ‘Auditing Algorithms for Discrimination’ (2017) 166(1) University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online 189.
Kindl J, ‘Prospects for concurrent private enforcement of the DMA and Article 102 TFEU’ (2024) 12 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 241–246.
Kirk A, ‘Consumer Autonomy and the Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2024) 13 Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 170–178.
Kleinberg J, Mullainathan S and Raghavan M, ‘Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores’ (2016) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807.
Kleinberg J, ‘Inherent trade-offs in algorithmic fairness’ (2018) 46(1) ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems 40.
Klijnsma J, ‘Contract Law as Fairness’ (2015) 28(1) Ratio Juris 68.
Knapstad T, ‘Breakups of Digital Gatekeepers under the Digital Markets Act: Three Strikes and You’re Out?’ (2023) 14(7) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 394–409.
Köchling A, Wehner, MC and Warkocz, J, ‘Can I show my skills? Affective response to artifcial intelligence in the recruitment process’ (2023) 17–6 Review of Managerial Science 2109.
Kokott J and Dittert D, ‘Fairness in Competition Law and Policy’ in D Gerard, A Komninos and D Waelbroeck (eds), Fairness in EU Competition Policy: Signifcance and Implications. An Inquiry into the Soul and Spirit of Competition Enforcement in Europe (Bruylant 2020).
Kolstad CD, Ulen TS and Johnson GV, ‘Ex Post Liability for Harm vs Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements’ (1990) 80(4) The American Economic Review 888–901.
Kolstad CD, ‘The Digital Markets Act and Private Enforcement: Proposals for an Optimal System of Enforcement’ in N. Charbit and S. Gachot (eds), Liber Amicorum Eleanor M. Fox, Antitrust Ambassador to the World (Concurrences 2021).
Komninos A, ‘Private Enforcement of the DMA. Rules before the National Courts’ (2024) 3 Mededingingsrecht in Praktijk 31–40.
Koppel JGS, ‘Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”’ (2005) 65(1) Public Administration Review 94.
Kovac M, ‘Autonomous Artifcial Intelligence and Uncontemplated Hazards: Towards the Optimal Regulatory Framework’ (2022) 13(1) European Journal of Risk Regulation 94.
Kozak M, ‘Private enforcement of competition law. Diversifed effects of haphazard harmonisation’ in T. van den Brink (ed.), Balancing Unity and Diversity in EU Legislation (Edward Elgar Publishing 2024).
Kroll JA and others, ‘Accountable Algorithms’ (2017) 165(3) University of Pennsylvania Law Review 633.
Krommendijk J, ‘Is there light on the horizon? The distinction between “Rewe effectiveness” and the principle of effective judicial protection in Article 47 of the Charter after Orizzonte’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 1395–1418.
Kuczerawy A, ‘Intermediary Liability & Freedom of Expression: Recent Developments in the EU Notice & Action Initiate’ (2015) 31 Computer Law & Security Review 46–56.
Kusner M and others, ‘Counterfactual fairness’ in Ulrich von Luxburg and others (eds), 31st Conference in Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc. 2017) 4069–4079.
Lalova-Spinks T, Meszaros J, and Huys I, ‘The application of data altruism in clinical research through empirical and legal analysis lenses’ (2023) Frontiers in Medicine 1–14.
Lamadrid de Pablo A, ‘Competition Law as Fairness’ (2017) 8(3) Journal of European Competition Law and Practice 147.
Latour B, ‘Agency at the Time of Anthropocene’ (2014) 45 New Literary History 1.
Laux J, Wachter S and Mittelstadt B, ‘Trustworthy artifcial intelligence and the European Union AI Act: On the confation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk’ (2024) 18(1) Regulation & Governance 3.
Lavrijssen S and Ottow A, ‘Independent Supervisory Authorities: A Fragile Concept’ (2012) 39 LIEI 419–446.
Lawford-Smith H and Collins S, ‘Collectives’ and Individuals’ Obligations: a Parity Argument’ (2016) 46(1) Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38.
Lee JD, ‘Post U.S. v Apple: How Should Most-Favoured Nation Clauses be Treated Now?’ (2015) 33(1) Cardozo Arts & Entertainment 237.
Leistner M, ‘The Commission’s vision for Europe’s digital future: proposals for the Data Governance Act, the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act – a critical primer’ (2021) 16(8) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 779.
Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons JA, ‘To Say what the Law of the EU is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ (2013) 09 EUI AEL Working Paper.
Letsas G, ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 509.
Li A, Cropanzano RS and Molina A, ‘Fairness at the Unit Level: Justice Climate, Justice Climate Strength, and Peer Justice’ in Russel S. Cropanzan and Maureen L. Ambrose (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press 2015).
Li J and Chignell M, ‘FMEA-AI: AI fairness impact assessment using failure mode and effects analysis’ (2022) 2 AI and Ethics 837.
Li S, Faure M and Havu K, ‘Liability Rules for AI-Related Harm: Law and Economics Lessons for a European Approach’ (2022) 13–4 European Journal of Risk Regulation 618.
Ligeiro N, Dias I and Moreira A, ‘Recruitment and Selection Process Using Artifcial Intelligence: How Do Candidates React?’ (2024) 14(7) Administrative Sciences 155.
Lindberg SI, ‘Mapping accountability: core concept and subtypes’ (2013) 79(2) International Review of Administrative Sciences 202.
MacCormick N, ‘Coherence in Legal Justifcation’ in Krawietz W., Schelsky H. and Winkler G. (eds), Theorie der Normen (Duncker & Humblot 1984).
Mak C, ‘Rights and Remedies. Article 47 EUCFR and Effective Judicial Protection in European Private Law Matters’ in Micklitz HW (ed.), Constitutionalization of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2014).
Malgieri G, ‘The concept of fairness in the GDPR: a linguistic and contextual interpretation’ in Mireille Hildebrandt and others (eds), FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery 2020) 154–166.
Margoni T and Strowel A, ‘Contractual freedom and fairness in EU data sharing agreements’, in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Licensing (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023, preprint).
Margoni T, Ducuing C and Schirru L, ‘Data property, data governance and common European data spaces’ (2023) 3(116) Computerrecht: Tijdschrift voor Informatica, Telecommunicatie en Recht 202–211.
Margvelashvili T, ‘Charting the Course of DMA’s Private Enforcement: Unveiling the Forum Shopping Challenge’ (2024) 20 European Competition Journal 588.
Mautner T, ‘How Rights Became “Subjective”’ (2013) 26(1) Ratio Juris 111.
McCarthy MB and Narayanan S, ‘Fairness–accuracy tradeoff: activation function choice in a neural network’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 1423.
McCrudden C, ‘The New Concept of Equality’ (2003) 4 Era Forum 9.
McKee D, ‘The Standard of Review for Questions of Procedural Fairness’ (2016) 41 Queen’s Law Journal 355–408.
Meding K and Hagendorff T, ‘Fairness Hacking: The Malicious Practice of Shrouding Unfairness in Algorithms’ (2024) 37 Philosophy & Technology 1.
Medmariashvili M, ‘Delegation of Rulemaking Power to European Standards Organization: Reconsidered’ (2017) 44(4) Legal Issues of Economic Integration 353.
Mehrabi N and others, ‘A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning’ (2021) 54(6) ACM Computing Surveys 1.
Mendelsohn J, ‘Reconsidering Conglomerates – how are digital conglomerates different from those in the past? Theory and implications’ (2023) 15(1) Competition Law Review 83.
Mendelsohn J, ‘Commentary of Art 13 DMA’ in Tobias Mast and others (eds), Digital Markets Act/Digital Services Act (CH Beck 2025).
Mendelsohn J and N Färber, ‘Der DMA und das neue Pay-or-Consent-Modell des Meta-Konzerns’ (2025) MMR 1/2025, 3–7.
Mendez-Pinedo E, ‘The principle of effectiveness of EU law: a diffcult concept in legal scholarship’ (2021) 11 Juridical Tribune 5–29.
Miguel Del Moral S, ‘The Devil is in the Procedure: Private Enforcement in the DMA and the DSA’ (2024) 9 University of Bologna Law Review 7.
Minow M, ‘Equality vs. Equity’ (2021) 1 American Journal of Law and Equality 167.
Mitchell S and others, ‘Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Defnitions’ (2021) 8 Annual Review of Statistics and Its Applications 141.
Moeckli D, ‘Interpretation of the ICESCR: Between Morality and State Consent’ in Moeckli Daniel, Keller Helen and Heri Corina (eds), The Human Rights Covenants at 50: Their Past, Present, and Future (Oxford University Press 2018).
Monti G, ‘Liability issues not codifed by the Damages Directive: how to fll such gaps?’ in PL Parcu and M Botta (eds), Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law. The Impact of the Damages Directive (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018) 42–61.
Monti G, ‘The digital markets act: Improving its institutional design’ (2021) 5(2) European Competition and Regulatory Law Review 90–101.
Moreno Belloso N and Petit N, ‘The EU Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Competition Hand in a Regulatory Glove’ (2023) 48 European Law Review 391.
Moskal A, ‘Digital Markets Act (DMA): A consumer protection perspective’ (2022) 7(3) European Papers 1113–1119.
Mulgan R, ‘“Accountability”: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’ (2000) 78(3) Public Administration 485.
Mullen E and Okimito TG, ‘Compensatory Justice’ in Russel S. Cropanzano and Maureen L. Ambrose (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press 2015) 477–496.
Natalia Moreno B and Nicolas P, ‘The EU Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Competition Hand in a Regulatory Glove’ (2023) 48 European Law Review 391.
Nehl HP, ‘Good administration as procedural right and/or general principle?’ in Herwig CH Hofmann and Alexander Türk (eds), Legal challenges in EU administrative law: towards an integrated administration (Edward Elgar Publishing 2009) 322–351.
Nemitz P, ‘Constitutional Democracy and Technology in the Age of Artifcial Intelligence’ (2018) 376 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 1.
Neuwirth RJ, ‘Law as Mnemonics: The Mind as the Prime Source of Normativity’ (2008) 2(1) European Journal of Legal Studies 144.
Nijman JE, ‘Grotius’ “Rule of Law” and the Human Sense of Justice: An Afterword to Martti Koskenneimii’s Foreword’ (2020) 30(4) European Journal of International Law 1105.
Novelli C, Taddeo M and Floridi L, ‘Accountability in artifcial intelligence: what it is and how it works’ (2024) 39 AI & Society 1871.
Nowag J and Tarkkila L, ‘How much effectiveness for the EU Damages Directive? Contractual clauses and antitrust damages actions’ (2020) 57(2) Common Market Law Review 433–474.
Nussbaum MC, ‘Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice’ (2003) 9(2–3) Feminist Economics 33.
O’Connel L, ‘Program Accountability as an Emergent Property: The Role of Stakeholders in a Program’s Field’ (2005) 65(1) Public Administration Review 85.
Olsen JP, ‘Accountability and Ambiguity’ in Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin and Thomas Schillemans (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford University Press 2014).
Oman NB, ‘Markets and Contractual Fairness’ (2021) 17(2) European Review of Contract Law 211.
Ortolani P, ‘If you build it, they will come: the DSA ‘Procedure before Substance’ approach in Joris van Hoboken et al. (ed.) Putting the DSA into practice –Enforcement, Access to Justice and Global Implications (Verfassungsbooks 2022).
Ortolani P, ‘The Resolution of Content Moderation Disputes under the Digital Services Act’ (2022) Giustizia Consensuale 533.
Owusu-Bempah A, ‘The interpretation and application of the right to effective participation’ (2018) 22(4) The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 321.
Pan Y, Forese F, Liu N, Hu Y and Ye M, ‘The adoption of artifcial intelligence in employee recruitment, The infuence of contextual factors’ (2022) 33(6) International Journal of Human Resource Management 1125.
Park J and others, ‘Causal invariance as a tacit aspiration: Analytic knowledge of invariance functions’ (2022) 132(2) Cognitive psychology, Article n° 101432, 1.
Pasternak A, ‘Fair Play and Wrongful Benefts’ (2017) 14 Journal of Moral Philosophy 515.
Pattanaik PK, ‘Rights, individual preferences and collective rationality’ in Kaushik Basu, Ravi Kanbur (eds), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, vol. 1, Ethics, Welfare and Measurement (Oxford University Press 2009) 214.
Pauer NI, ‘Philosophical Impetus to Fair Digital Markets – Ascertaining Fairness Theorems for Just Market Settings’ (2025) ACLU Conference Paper (forthcoming in the Nordic Journal of European Law).
Pauwelyn J, ‘The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus’ (2015) 109 American Journal of International Law 761.
Peat D and Matthew W, ‘Playing the Game of Interpretation On Meaning and Metaphor in International Law’ in Bianchi Andrea, Peat Daniel and Windsor Matthew (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015).
Pech L and Platon S, ‘Court of Justice Judicial independence under threat: The Court of Justice to the rescue in the ASJP case’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1827.
Pera A, ‘Fairness, competition on the merits and article 102’ (2022) 18(2) European Competition Journal 229–248.
Pescatore P, ‘The Doctrine of Direct Effect: An Infant Disease of Community Law’ (1983) 8 European Law Review 135–153.
Pessach D and Shmueli E, ‘A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning’ (2022) 55(3) ACM Computing Surveys 1.
Peter F, ‘Pure Epistemic Proceduralism’ (2008) 5(1) Episteme 33.
Petit N and Léonard A, ‘FRAND Royalties: Rules v Standards?’ (2023) 22(1) Journal of Intellectual Property 102.
Petit N, ‘The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): A Legal and Policy Review’ (2021) 12 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 529–541.
Pirker B and Skoczeń I, ‘Inside the Treaty Interpreter’s Mind: An Experimental Linguistic Approach to International Law’ (2023) 36 Leiden Journal of International Law 519.
Piron R, ‘Fair Outcome/Fair Process’ (1985) 75(4) The American Economic Review 878.
Pitruzzella G, ‘Recent CJEU case law on excessive pricing cases’ in Marco Botta, Giorgio Monti, and Pier Luigi Parcu (eds), The Interaction of Competition Law and Sector Regulation: Emerging Trends at the National and EU Level (Edward Elgar Publishing 2022).
Podszun R, ‘Private Enforcement and Gatekeeper Regulation: Strengthening the Rights of Private Parties in the Digital Markets Act’ (2022) 13 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 254.
Podszun R, ‘Private Enforcement and Gatekeeper Regulation: Strengthening the Rights of Private Parties in the Digital Markets Act’ (2022) 13(4) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 254–267.
Podszun R, ‘From Competition Law to Platform Regulation – Regulatory Choices for the Digital Markets Act’ (2023) 17(1) Economics 20220037 https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0037.
Posner RA, ‘Rational Choice, Behavioural Economics and the Law’ (1998) 50(5) Stanford Law Review 1551.
Prechal S, ‘Article 19 TEU and National Courts: A New Role for the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection?’ in Eliantonio M, Bonelli M and Gentile G (eds), Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protection, vol 1 (Hart Publishing 2022).
Quintais JP, Appelman N and Fahy R, ‘Using Terms and Conditions to Apply Fundamental Rights to Content Moderation’ (2022) 24 German Law Journal 881–911.
Raab CD and Hijmans H, ‘Ethical Dimensions of the GDPR’ in M. Cole and F. Boehm (eds), Commentary on the General Data Protection Regulation (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).
Raz J, ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’ (1972) 81 The Yale Law Journal 823.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘The DMA’s Ithaca: Contestable and Fair Markets’ (2023) 46(4) World Competition 429–458.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘Rebutting Gatekeeper Presumptions in the Digital Markets Act: Case T-1077/23 Bytedance Ltd v European Commission’ (2024) 15(8) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 537.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘The Credibility of the DMA’s Compliance Reports’ (2024) SSRN Working Paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4932420.
Riis N, ‘Shaping the Field of EU Data Law’ (2023) 14 JIPITEC.
Riley A, ‘The European Cartel Offce: a Guardian without Weapons?’ (1997) 18 European Constitutional Law Review 3–16.
Riley S, ‘Human Dignity as a Sui Generis Principle’ (2019) 32(4) Ratio Juris 439.
Robertson VHSE, ‘The complementary nature of the Digital Markets Act and the EU antitrust rules’ (2024) 12(2) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 325.
Rochel J, ‘Ethics in the GDPR: A Blueprint for Applied Legal Theory’ (2021) International Data Privacy Law.
Rochel J, ‘Learning from the Ethics of AI – A Research Proposal on Soft Law and Ethics of AI’ (2023) 27 Tilburg Law Review 37.
Rocheleau J, ‘Proceduralism’ in Deen K. Chatterjee (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice (Springer 2011) 906.
Rodrigues R, ‘Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities’ (2020) 4 Journal of Responsible Technology 1.
Ross M, ‘Effectiveness in the European Union Legal Order(s): Beyond Supremacy to Constitutional Proportionality?’ (2006) 33 European Law Review 476–498.
Rubenstein J, ‘Accountability in an Unequal World’ (2007) 69(3) The Journal of Politics 616–632.
Ruohonen J and Mickelsson S, ‘Refections on the Data Governance Act’ (2023) 2(10) Digital Society.
Russell C and others, ‘When Worlds Collide: Integrating Different Counterfactual Assumptions in Fairness’ in Isabelle Guyon and others (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing System 30 (Curran Associates, Inc. 2017).
Šadl U, ‘The role of Effet Utile in preserving the continuity and authority of European Union law: evidence from the citation web of the pre-accession case law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ (2015) 8 European Journal of Legal Studies 18–46.
Šadl U and Olsen HP, ‘Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 327.
Schillemans T and Busuioc M, ‘Predicting Public Sector Accountability: From Agency Drift to Forum Drift’ (2015) 25(1) Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 191.
Schmitt C, ‘La tyrannie des valeurs (ou: Le chemin de l’enfer est pavé de valeurs)’ (2015) 1(5) Société, droit et religion 5.
Schütte B, ‘The proposal for a revised Product Liability Directive: The emperor’s new clothes?’ (2023) 30(5) Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law 573.
Schweitzer H, ‘Digitale Plattformen als private Gesetzgeber: Ein Perspektivwechsel für die Europäisches Plattformregulierung’ (2019) Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 1–12.
Schweitzer H, ‘The art to make gatekeeper positions contestable and the challenge to know what is fair: A discussion of the Digital Markets Act Proposal’ (2021) 3 Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 503.
Schweitzer H and de Ridder S, ‘How to Fix a Failing Art. 102 TFEU: Substantive Interpretation, Evidentiary Requirements, and the Commission’s Future Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses’ (2024) 15(4) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 222.
Schwemer SF, ‘Digital Services Act: a reform of the e-commerce Directive and much more’ in A Savin and J Traskowski (ed.) Research Handbook on EU Internet Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023) 232–252.
Sellers M, ‘Law, Reason and Emotion’ in Mortimer Sellers (ed.), Law, Reason and Emotion (Cambridge University Press 2017).
Simitis S, Hornung G and Spiekergen. Döhmann I, ‘I. History and Motive of Data Protection Legislation’ in Indra Spieker gen. Döhmann, Vagelis Papakonstantinou, Gerrit Hornung and Paul De Hert, General Data Protection Regulation: Article-by-Article Commentary (Nomos 2023).
Smith S, ‘In Defense of Substantive Fairness’ (1996) 112 Law Quarterly Review 138.
Smuha NA, ‘The Work of the High-Level Expert Group on AI as the Precursor of the AI Act’ in Necati Pehlivan Ceyhun, Nikolaus Forgó and Peggy Valcke (eds), AI Governance and Liability in Europe–A primer (Wolters Kluwer forthcoming 2025) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5012626.
Solum LB, ‘Legal Personhood for Artifcial Intelligence’ (1992) 70(4) North Carolina Law Review (1992) 1231.
Solum LB, ‘Procedural Justice’ (2004) 78(1) Southern California Law Review 181.
Sousa Ferro M, ‘Consumer Antitrust Private Enforcement in Europe’ (2022) 13(8) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 578–593.
Soyer B and Tettenborn A, ‘Artifcial intelligence and civil liability–do we need a new regime?’ (2022) 30 International Journal of Law & Information Technology 385.
Stancil P, ‘Substantive Equality and Procedural Justice’ (2016) 102(4) Iowa Law Review 1633.
Stephan A, ‘Does the EU’s drive for private enforcement of competition law have coherent purpose?’ (2018) 37(1) University of Queensland Law Journal 153–168.
Stigler GJ, ‘The Law and Economics of Public Policy: A Plea to the Scholars’ (1972) 1(1) The Journal of Legal Studies 1.
Stith R, ‘A Critique of Fairness’ (1982) 16(3) Valparaiso University Law Review 459.
Strand M, ‘Private Enforcement Under the Digital Markets Act: Rights and Remedies Revisited’ (2024) 7 AI Design Futures, WASP-HS 120.
Streinz T, ‘The Evolution of European Data Law’ in Paul Craig and Gráinne de Búrca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2021).
Taylor L and others, ‘(Re)making data markets: an exploration of the regulatory challenges’ (2022) 14(2) Law, Innovation & Technology 355.
Thal SN, ‘The Inequality of bargaining power doctrine: The problem of defning contractual unfairness’ (1988) 8(1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17.
Tjon Soei Len LKL and de Ruijter A, ‘Conceptualising the Tortuous Harms of Sexist and Racist Hate Speech’ (2023) 2 European Law Open 8.
Tobler C, ‘The Prohibition of Discrimination in the Union’s Layered System of Equality Law: From Early Staff Cases to the Mangold Approach’ in The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspective on Sixty Years of Case-law – La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (Asser 2013) 443.
Törnblom K and Kazemi A, ‘Distributive Justice: Revisiting Past Statements and Refecting on Future Prospects’ in Russel S. Cropanzan and Maureen L. Ambrose (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace (Oxford University Press 2015) 15–50.
Trautmann ST and van de Kuilen G, ‘Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: Experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity’ (2016) 53 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 75.
Tridimas T and Gentile G, ‘The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 794.
Turillazzi A and others, ‘The digital services act: an analysis of its ethical, legal, and social implications’ (2023) 15 Law, Innovation and Technology 83.
Tyler T, ‘What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures’ (1988) 22 Law and Society Review 103–135.
Tyler T and Lind EA, ‘Procedural Justice’ in Joseph Sandler and V. Lee Hamilton (eds), Handbook of Justice Research in Law (Springer 2001) 65–92.
Tyler T, ‘Procedural Justice and the Courts’ (2007) 44 Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association 26–31.
Ullrich H, ‘Private Enforcement of the EU Rules on Competition – Nullity Neglected’ (2021) 52 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 606–635.
Ullrich H, ‘The EU Data Act’s Rules on Access to and Use of Data and the Rules of the Market’ in A. Bakardjieva and B. Lundqvist (eds), The EU as a Transformative Legal and Economic Order – Conference in Memory of U. Bernitz (forthcoming).
Valdivia A, Corbera Serrajordia J and Swianiewicz A, ‘There is an elephant in the room: towards a critique on the use of fairness in biometrics’ (2023) 3 AI and Ethics 1407.
Vale D, El-Sharif A and Ali M, ‘Explainable artifcial intelligence (XAI) post-hoc explainability methods: risks and limitations in non-discrimination law’ (2022) 2 AI & Ethics 815.
Valentini L, ‘Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map’ (2012) 7 Philosophy Compass 654.
Van Aaken A, ‘Experimental Insights for International Legal Theory’ (2020) 30 European Journal of International Law 1237.
Van Cleynenbreugel P, ‘Judge-made standards of national procedure in the post-Lisbon constitutional framework’ (2012) 39 European Law Review 90–100.
Van Cleynenbreugel P, ‘Effectiveness through fairness? Due process as an institutional precondition for effective decentralized EU competition law enforcement’ in Paul Nihoul and Tadeusz Skoczny (ed.), Procedural Fairness in Competition Proceedings (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014) 44–88.
Van Cleynenbreugel P, ‘Due Process in EU Commission Competition Law Proceedings. What Lessons (not) to Learn for Structuring the Rights of Defense at the National Level?’ in Csongor Nagy (ed.) The Procedural Aspects of the Application of Competition law–European Frameworks, Central-European Perspectives (Europa Law Publishing 2016) 36–55.
Van Cleynenbreugel P, ‘Article 50’ in Brunessen Bertrand (ed.), Règlement DSA 2022/20265 relatif à un marché unique des services numériques. Commentaire article par article (Bruylant 2024).
Van Cleynenbreugel P, ‘Les enjeux de droit administratif européen du DSA’ in Brunessen Bertrand (ed.) La Régulation juridique des plateformes (Mare & Marin 2025).
Van de Waerdt PJ, ‘Information asymmetries: recognizing the limits of the GDPR on the data-driven market’ (2020) 38 Computer Law & Security Review, Article n° 105436.
Van Gerven W, ‘Of Rights, Remedies and Procedures’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 501.
Van Gestel R and Micklitz H-W, ‘European integration through standardization: How judicial review is breaking down the club house of private standardization bodies’ (2013) 50(1) Common Market Law Review 145.
Vandenborre I and Frese MJ, ‘Most Favoured Nation Clauses Revisited’ (2014) 12 European Competition Law Review 588.
Vandenborre I and Frese MJ, ‘The Role of Market Transparency in Assessing MFN Clauses’ (2015) 38(3) World Competition 333.
Venit J, ‘Brave New World: The Modernization and Decentralization of Enforcement under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 545–580.
Vickers J, ‘Competition Policy and the Consumer Welfare Standard’ (2024) 13(1) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 6.
Von Ditfurth L and Lienemann G, ‘The Data Governance Act – Promoting or Restricting Data Intermediaries? (2022) 23(4) Competition and Regulation in Network Industries.
Wachter S, Mittelstadt B and Russell C, ‘Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR’ (2018) 31(2) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 841.
Wachter S and Mittelstadt B, ‘A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI’ (2019) 2 Columbia Business Law Review 494–620.
Wachter S, ‘Affnity Profling and Discrimination by Association in Online Behavioral Advertising’ (2020) 38 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 367–430.
Wachter S, Mittelstadt B and Russell C, ‘Bias preservation in machine learning: The legality of fairness metrics under EU non-discrimination law’ (2021) 123(3) West Virginia Law Review 735.
Wachter S, Mittelstadt B and Russell C, ‘Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI’ (2021) 41 Computer Law & Security Review 1.
Wang KK, Cardiz Dyball M, Wang A, ‘The link between formality and procedural fairness. The infuences of precision, sensitivity and role clarity’ (2024) 63(1) Accounting & Finance 1571.
Ward A and others, ‘Article 47 – Right to an Effective Remedy’ in Peers S and others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Hart Publishing 2021).
Weber R, ‘Transparency and the governance of the Internet’ (2008) 24 Computer Law & Security Review 342–348.
Weerts H and others, ‘Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law; Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree’ in Sarah Fox and others (eds), FAccT ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Association for Computing Machinery 2023) 805–816.
Weinberg L, ‘Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches’ (2022) 74 Journal of Artifcial Intelligence Research 75–109.
Westphal KR, ‘From ‘Convention’ to ‘Ethical Life’: Hume’s Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective’ (2010) 7 Journal of Moral Philosophy 105.
Whish R and Bailey D, ‘Private enforcement of competition law: its role and development in the EU’ in BJ Rodger, M Sousa Ferro and F Marcos (eds), Research Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law in the EU (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023).
Widdershoven R, ‘National Procedural Autonomy and EU law limits’ (2019) 12 Review of European Administrative Law 5–34.
Wielsch D, ‘Commentary of Art 5 DMA’ in Tobias Mast and others (eds), Digital Markets Act/Digital Services Act (CH Beck 2025).
Wilks S and McGowan L, ‘Disarming the Commission: the Debate over a European Cartel Offce’, (1995) 32 Journal of Common Market Studies 259–273.
Wilman F, ‘Between Preservation and Clarifcation: the Evolution of the DSA’s Liability Rules in light of the CJEU’s case law’ in van Hoboken J et al. (ed.) Putting the DSA into practice – Enforcement, Access to Justice and Global Implications (Verfassungsbooks 2022).
Wils WP, ‘The Judgment of the EU General Court in Intel and the So-Called ‘More Economic Approach’ to Abuse of Dominance’ (2014) 37(4) World Competition: Law and Economics Review 405.
Wils WP, ‘The European Commission’s “‘ECN+’ Proposal for a Directive to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers”’ (2017) Concurrences 60–80.
Winner L, ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’ (1980) 109(1) Daedalus 121.
Witt AC, ‘Who’s Afraid of Conglomerate Mergers?’ (2022) 67(2) The Antitrust Bulletin 208.
Witt AC, ‘The Digital Market Act – Regulating The Wild West’ (2023) 60 Common Market Law Review 625.
Wörsdörfer M, ‘Brandeis and Eucken – Two Pioneers of the Modern Big Tech and Antitrust Debate’ (2023) 2 History of Economic Ideas 87.
Wrbka S, Van Uytsel S and Siems M, ‘Access to Justice and Collective Actions: ‘Florence’ and Beyond’ in Wrbka S, Van Uytsel S and Siems M (eds), Collective Actions: Enhancing Access to Justice and Reconciling Multilayer Interests? (Cambridge University Press 2012).
Wronkowska S, ‘Analiza pojęcia prawa podmiotowego’ (1973) 61 Prace Wydziału Prawa – Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
Wurmnest W and Gömann M, ‘Comparing Private Enforcement of EU Competition and Data Protection Law’ (2022) 13 Journal of European Tort Law 154.
Xenidis R, ‘Tuning EU equality law to algorithmic discrimination: Three pathways to resilience’ (2020) 27(6) Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law 736.
Xenidis R, ‘The polysemy of anti-discrimination law: the interpretation architecture of the framework employment Directive at the Court of Justice’ (2021) 58(6) Common Market Law Review 1649.
Xenidis R, ‘Beyond bias: algorithmic machines, discrimination and the analogy trap’ (2023) 14(4) Transnational Legal Theory 378.
Yoo C, ‘The Post-Chicago Antitrust Revolution: A Retrospective’ (2020) 168 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2145.
Zamboni M, ‘Legislative Policy and Effectiveness: A (Small) Contribution from Legal Theory’ (2018) 9 European Journal of Risk Regulation 416–430.
Zanfr-Fortuna G, ‘Follow the (Personal) Data: Positioning Data Protection Law as the Cornerstone of the EU’s ‘Fit for the Digital Age’ Legislative Package’, in European Data Protection Supervisor (ed.), Two Decades of Personal Data Protection: What Next? (Publications Offce of the European Union 2024).
Zech H, ‘Liability for Autonomous Systems: Tackling Specifc Risks of Modern IT’ in Sebastian Lohsse, Reiner Schulze, Dirk Staudenmayer (eds), Liability for Artifcial Intelligence and the Internet of Things (Hart 2019) 187.
Zhang JM and others, ‘Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizons’ (2022) 48(1) IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 1.
Zhang L, Wu Y and Wu X, ‘A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discrimination’ (2016) arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07509.
Zhao H and Gordon GJ, ‘Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representations’ (2022) 23 Journal of Machine Learning Research 1.
Baloup J and others, White Paper on the Data Governance Act (CiTiP Working Paper 2021, 23 June 2021), available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/citip-white-paper-on-the-data-governance-act/.
BEUC The European Consumer Organisation, ‘Towards European Digital Fairness.
BEUC Framing response paper for the REFIT consultation’ [2023] https://www.beuc.eu/position-papers/towards-european-digital-fairness-response-paper-reft-consultation.
Bobev T and others, ‘White Paper on the Defnition of Data Intermediation Services’ (CiTiP White Paper, 2 October 2023), available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/en/news/item/archived_news/new-citip-white-paper-on-the-defnition-of-data-intermediation-services-data-intermediaries-under-the-data-governance-act.
Chicago Booth George J Stigler Center, ‘Report from the Committee for the Study of Digital Platforms’ (September 2019) https://www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/research/stigler/pdfs/digital-platforms---committee-report---stigler-center.pdf.
Crémer J, ‘Will the Digital Markets Act create a level playing feld?’ (25 March 2024) Toulouse School of Law and Economics Digital www.tse-fr.eu/Digital-Markets-Act.
Crémer J, Y-A de Montjiye and H Schweitzer, ‘Competition policy for the digital era’ (EU Commission, April 2019) https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2763/407537.
Data Space Support Centre, ‘DSSC Glossary’ (last updated 13 March 2024) ‘2 Core Concepts’, https://dssc.eu/space/BVE/357073747/2+Core+Concepts.
Davola A, ‘The Digital Services Act published: A good start and – yet – just a start’, Kluwer Competition Law Blog 2020, available at https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2022/10/19/the-digital-services-act-published-a-good-start-and-yet-just-a-start/.
Demková S and De Gregorio G, ‘The Looming Enforcement Crisis in European Digital Policy – A rule-of-law centered path forward’, (2025) Verfassungsblog https://verfassungsblog.de/the-looming-enforcement-crisis-ai-dsa-eu/.
de Streel A and Husovec M, ‘The e-commerce Directive as the cornerstone of the Internal Market: assessment and options for reform’, Study for the European Parliament (2020), available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648797/IPOL_STU(2020)648797_EN.pdf.
Ducuing C and Stähler L, ‘Digital Public Utilities? The EU Approach for Regulating the Digital Environment’ (Network, Platform and Utilities Conference 2024, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, June 2024), available at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/4179023&lang=en.
Dustin J, ‘Insight – Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women’ (11 October 2018), https://www.reuters.com/article/world/insight-amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK0AG/.
European Agency for Fundamental Rights, Handbook on European Data Protection Law (Publications Offce of the European Union 2014), available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/handbook-european-data-protection-law-2014-edition#:~:text=This%20handbook%20is%20designed%20to,the%20CoE’s%20applicable%20legal%20frameworks.
European Commission, ‘Expert Group on B2B data sharing and cloud computing contracts (EO3840)’, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3840.
European Commission, White Paper, Artifcial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust, COM (2020) 65 fnal, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52020DC0065.
European Commission Staff Working Document – Impact Assessment Report accompanying the document: proposal for a Directive on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artifcial intelligence, SWD(2022) 319 fnal, available at https://commission.europa.eu/system/fles/2022-09/1_4_197608_impact_asse_dir_ai_en.pdf.
European Commission, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on liability of defective products, COM(2022) 495 fnal, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022PC0495.
European Data Protection Board (EDPB), ‘Opinion 08/2024 on Valid Consent in the Context of Consent or Pay Models Implemented by Large Online Platforms’ (2024), available at www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/opinion-board-art-64/opinion-082024-valid-consent-context-consent-or_en.
Furman J and others, ‘Unlocking digital competition. Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel’ (UK Digital Competition Expert Panel 2019), available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c88150ee5274a230219c35f/unlocking_digital_competition_furman_review_web.pdf.
Geradin D, ‘When Apple takes the European Commission for fools: An initial overview of Apple’s new terms and conditions for iOS app distribution in the EU’ (Platform Law Blog, 26 January 2024) https://theplatformlaw.blog/2024/01/26/when-apple-takes-the-european-commission-for-fools-an-initial-overview-of-apples-new-terms-and-conditions-for-ios-app-distribution-in-the-eu/.
Mândrescu D, ‘The Apple App Store. A New Kind of Hallmark Case’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 18 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/18/the-apple-app-store-a-new-kind-of-hallmark-case/.
Markovits D, ‘Market Solidarity: Price as Commensuration, Contract as Integration’ (2013) https://blogs.fu-berlin.de/cle-berlin/fles/2014/05/Markovits-Market-Solidarity.pdf.
Marsden P and Podszun R, ‘Restoring Balance to Digital Competition – Sensible Rules and Effective Enforcement’ (2020) KAS Report www.kas.de/en/single-title/-/content/restoring-balance-to-digital-competition-sensible-rules-effective-enforcement.
Ménière Y, Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Licensing Terms: Research Analysis of a Controversial Concept (JRC Science and Policy Report, European Commission 2015), available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC96258.
Ortolani P, ‘If You Build It, They Will Come’ (2022) Vervassunsblog https://verfassungsblog.de/dsa-build-it/.
Picht P, ‘Private Enforcement for the DSA/DGA/DMA Package: Competition Law Lessons and Beyond’ (3 September 2023) Vervassunsblog https://verfassungsblog.de/power-dsa-dma-09/.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘Alphabet’s DMA Compliance Workshop – The Power of No: A Gargantuan Task Ahead and a Dual Role in Balancing Interests’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 22 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/22/alphabets-dma-compliance-workshop-the-power-of-no-a-gargantuan-task-ahead-and-a-dual-role-in-balancing-interests/.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘Amazon’s DMA Compliance Workshop – The Power of No: Customer-Obsessed Pathos’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 21 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/21/amazons-dma-compliance-workshop-the-power-of-no-customer-obsessed-pathos/.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘ByteDance’s DMA Compliance Workshop – The Power of No: A Walk in the Park’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 25 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/25/bytedances-dma-compliance-workshop-the-power-of-no-a-walk-in-the-park/.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘Meta’s DMA Compliance Workshop – The Power of No: Making Perfectly Rational Choices’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 20 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/20/metas-dma-compliance-workshop-the-power-of-no-making-perfectly-rational-choices/.
Ribera Martínez A, ‘Microsoft’s DMA Compliance Workshop – The Power of No: The (Odd) New Kid on the Block’ (Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 27 March 2024) https://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2024/03/27/microsofts-dma-compliance-workshop-the-power-of-no-the-odd-new-kid-on-the-block/.
Schneider H, ‘The European Union’s Digital Markets Act Seeks to Regulate Competition with Little Regard to Impact on Consumers’ (2022) Study by Competitive Enterprise Institute, available at https://cei.org/studies/the-european-unions-digital-markets-act-seeks-to-regulate-competition-with-little-regard-to-impact-on-consumers/.
Scott Morton FM and Caffarra C, ‘The European Commission Digital Markets Act: A translation’ (5 January 2021) VOX EU Columns CEPR https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/european-commission-digital-markets-act-translation.
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 2023 Antitrust and Competition Conference – Beyond the Consumer Welfare Standard? (20–21 April 2023) www.chicagobooth.edu/research/stigler/events/2023-antitrust.
Van Cleynenbreugel P and Mattioli P, ‘Digital Services Coordinators and other competent authorities in the Digital Services Act: streamlined enforcement coordination lost?’ (2024) European Law Blog https://www.europeanlawblog.eu/pub/digital-services-coordinators-and-other-competent-authorities-in-the-digital-services-act-streamlined-enforcement-coordination-lost/release/1.
Wambach A, Schweitzer H and Schallbruch M, ‘A New Competition Framework for the Digital Economy – Report by the Commission’ (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, December 2019) https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Wirtschaft/a-new-competition-framework-for-the-digital-economy.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
Wu J and Bigelow JP, ‘Competition and the Most Favoured Nation Clause’ (2013) CPI Antitrust Chronicle https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/competition-and-the-most-favored-nation-clause/.
