Animals; Bone Remodeling/physiology; Bone Resorption; Dogs; Femur/physiology/transplantation; Hip Prosthesis/methods; Tendons/anatomy & histology/physiology; Tensile Strength; Time Factors
Abstract :
[en] This study compared three methods of gluteus medius tendon attachment to an allograft/endoprosthetic composite of the proximal 25% of the femur in a canine model. The three methods were bone to bone, tendon to bone, and tendon to tendon attachment. In an in vivo study, 24 dogs were assigned to three groups of eight dogs each, and serial radiography and weight-bearing analyses were performed throughout the study. The dogs were killed at 6 months, and the specimens were tested in tension to failure and were analyzed histologically. In an in vitro study, each repair was done on six limbs, with a contralateral limb serving as a control for each. In these specimens, the bone to bone attachments were significantly stronger (99.1% of the controls) than the tendon to bone attachments (71.8% of the controls) and the tendon to tendon attachments (40.0% of the controls); there were no differences in tensile stiffness among the three types of attachment. By 6 months, the tensile strength of the tendon to tendon attachments increased significantly and that of the tendon to bone attachments decreased significantly. There were no significant differences in tensile strength among the three types of attachment. The tensile stiffness of the bone to bone attachments (91.0% of the controls) was significantly greater than that of the tendon to bone attachments (40.8% of the controls) but not significantly different from that of the tendon to tendon attachments (63.2% of the controls). The bone to bone attachment was associated with increased bone resorption, bone remodeling, and bone porosity, accompanied by thinner allograft cortices, when compared with the other types of attachment. In dogs with a bone to bone attachment, weight-bearing increased more slowly than in dogs with either of the other two attachments. These changes associated with the bone to bone attachment may merely be secondary to healing of the bone to bone attachment to the greater trochanter; therefore, they may only be temporary phenomena or they may be the portents for long-term complications. Longer term studies of at least 1-2 years must be performed before these questions can be answered.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Markel, M D; Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine,
Wood, S A
Bogdanske, J J
Rapoff, A J
Kalscheur, V L
Bouvy, Bernard ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'Enseignement et de Clinique des animaux de Compagnie (DCC) > Chirurgie des animaux de compagnie
Rock, M G
Chao, E Y
Vanderby, R Jr
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of healing of allograft/endoprosthetic composites with three types of gluteus medius attachment.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE (1991) Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:235-240.
Baron R, Vignery A, Neff L, Silverglate A, Santa (1983) Processing of undecalcified bone specimens for bone histomorphometry. Bone Histomorphometry: Techniques and Interpretation , Ed by, RR Recker, Boca Raton, CRC Press; 13-35.
Budsberg SC, Jevens DJ, Brown J, Foutz TL, De Camp CE, Reece L (1993) Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 54:1569-1574.
Czitrom AA (1992) Allograft reconstruction after tumor surgery in the appendicular skeleton. Allografts in Orthopaedic Practice , Ed by, AA Czitrom, AE Gross, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins; 83-119.
Gitelis S, Heligman D, Quill G, Piasecki P (1988) The use of large allografts for tumor reconstruction and salvage of the failed total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:62-70.
Gitelis S, Piasecki P (1991) Allograft prosthetic composite arthroplasty for osteosarcoma and other aggressive bone tumors. Clin Orthop 270:197-201.
Glasser D, Langlais F (1991) The ISOLS radiological implants evaluation system. Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions , Ed by, F Langlais, B Tomeno, Berlin, Springer‐Verlag; 23-31.
Gross AE, Lavoie MV, McDermott P, Marks P (1985) The use of allograft bone in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 197:115-122.
Gross AE (1992) Revision arthroplasty of the hip using allograft bone. Allografts in Orthopaedic Practice , Ed by, AA Czitrom, AE Gross, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins; 147-174.
Jofe MH, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ (1988) Reconstruction for defects of the proximal part of the femur using allograft arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:507-516.
Johnson ME, Mankin HJ (1991) Reconstructions after resections of tumors involving the proximal femur. Orthop Clin North Am 22:87-103.
Mankin HJ, Doppelt S, Tomford W (1983) Clinical experience with allograft implantation: the first ten years. Clin Orthop 174:69-86.
Markel MD, Wikenheiser MA, Chao EYS (1991) Formation of bone in tibial defects in a canine model: histomorphometric and biomechanical studies. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:914-923.
Markel MD, Rock MG, Bergenthal DS, Young DR, Vanderby R, Chao EYS (1993) Short communication: a mechanical comparison of gluteus medius attachment methods in a canine model. J Orthop Res 11:457-461.
O'Carroll PF, Hurson JB, Sheehan JM (1983) A technique of medial ligament repair of the knee with cancellous screws and spiked washers. Injury 15:99-104.
Roberson JR (1992) Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:291-302.
Robertson DB, Daniel DM, Biden E (1986) Soft tissue fixation to bone. Am J Sports Med 14:398-403.
Shino K, Horibe S (1991) Experimental ligament reconstruction by allogenic tendon graft in a canine model. Acta Orthop Belg 57:44-53.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.