[en] It has become increasingly common to argue that climate change will lead to mass migrations. In this chapter, we examine the large numbers often invoked to underline alarming climate migration narratives. We outline the methodological limitations to their production. We argue for a greater diversity of knowledges about climate migration, rooted in qualitative and mixed methods. We also question the usefulness of numbers to progressive agendas for climate action. Large numbers are used for rhetorical effect to create fear of climate migration, but this approach backfires when they are used to justify security-oriented, anti-migrant agendas. In addition, quantification helps present migration as a management problem with decisions based on meeting quantitative targets, instead of prioritising peoples’ needs, rights, and freedoms.
Disciplines :
Sociology & social sciences Human geography & demography Political science, public administration & international relations Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Durand-Delacre, David; University of Cambridge
Bettini, Giovanni; Lancaster University
Nash, Sarah, L.; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna (Austria)
Sterly, Harald; University of Vienna
Gioli, Giovanna; Bath Spa University
Hut, Elodie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Service de géographie rurale (LAPLEC)
Boas, Ingrid; Wageningen University
Farbotko, Carol; University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia
Sakdapolrak, Patrick; University of Vienna
de Bruijn, Mirjam; Universiteit Leiden
Tripathy Furlong, Basundhara; Wageningen University
van der Geest, Kees; United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS)
Lietaer, Samuel; Université Libre de Bruxelles - ULB