[en] A multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study (368 patients treating two attacks) was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray (20 mg) with dihydroergotamine (DHE) nasal spray (1 mg plus optional 1 mg). At the primary efficacy time point of 60 minutes after dosing, significantly more patients obtained headache relief (change from moderate or severe to none or mild) after treatment with sumatriptan than with DHE (53% sumatriptan, 41% DHE, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients reported relief of nausea after sumatriptan than after DHE at 60 minutes (64% sumatriptan, 49% DHE, p = 0.006). A significant difference between the two treatments was first observed at 45 minutes with respect to both headache relief (38% sumatriptan, 31% DHE, p = 0.037) and relief of nausea (55% sumatriptan, 40% DHE, p = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two treatments for other measures of efficacy. Both treatments were well tolerated, with only 10% of patients in each group reporting one or more adverse events. The most frequently reported adverse event after sumatriptan was a bad or bitter taste, which was reported by 5% of patients. After DHE, 4% of patients reported symptoms of the nasal cavity/sinuses and 3% reported nausea and/or vomiting as adverse events. It is concluded that sumatriptan nasal spray is superior to DHE nasal spray in the relief of pain and nausea associated with acute migraine headache.
Disciplines :
Neurology Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Boureau, F.
Kappos, L.
Schoenen, Jean ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Neuro-anatomie
Esperanca, P.
Ashford, E.
Language :
English
Title :
A clinical comparison of sumatriptan nasal spray and dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine.
Tansey MJB, Pilgrim AJ, Lloyd K. Sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine. J Neurol Sci 1993; 114: 109-116.
The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group. Treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 316-321.
The Oral Sumatriptan Dose-defining Study Group. Sumatriptan: an oral dose-defining study. Eur Neurol 1991; 31: 300-305.
The Finnish Sumatriptan Group and the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Group. A placebo-controlled study of intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 1991; 31: 332-338.
Ryan R, Elkind A, Baker CC et al. Sumatriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: results of two clinical studies. Neurology 1997; 49: 1225-1230.
Bousser MG, Lorai Y. Efficacy of dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 1985; 5(suppl 3): 554-555.
Di Serio F, Patin J, Freidman A. USA trials of dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine headache. Cephalalgia 1989; 9(suppl 10): 344-345.
Krause KH, Bleicher MA. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the treatment of migraine attacks. Cephalalgia 1985; 5(suppl 3): 138-139.
Massiou H. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray in prevention and treatment of migraine attacks: two controlled trials versus placebo. Cephalalgia 1987; 7(suppl 6): 440-441.
Paiva T, Esperanca P, Marcelino L, Assis G. A double-blind trial with dihydroergotamine spray in migraine crisis. Cephalalgia 1985; 5(suppl 3): 140-141.
Rohr J, Dufresne JJ. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray for the treatment of migraine attacks: a comparative double-blind crossover study with placebo. Cephalalgia 1985; 5(suppl 3): 142-143.
Tulunay FC, Karan O, Aydin N et al. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray during migraine attacks: a double-blind crossover study with placebo. Cephalalgia 1987; 7: 131-133.
Ziegler D, Ford R, Kriegler J et al. Dihydroergotamine nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 1994; 44: 447-453.
Touchon J, Bertin L, Pilgrim AJ et al. A comparison of subcutaneous sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 1996; 47: 361-365.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification of diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988; 8(suppl 7): 19-21.
Kenward MG, Jones B. A log-linear model for binary cross-over data. Appl Stats 1987; 36(2): 192-204.
Gart JJ. An exact test for comparing matched proportions in cross-over designs. Biometrika 1969; 56: 75-80.
Prescott RJ. The comparison of success rates in cross-over trials in the presence of an order effect. Appl Stats 1981; 30: 9-15.
Kenward MG, Jones N. Alternative approaches to the analysis of binary and categorical repeated measurements. J Biopharm Stats 1992; 2: 137-170.