CUSUM control charts for the Coefficient of Variation with Measurement Errors

[en] Due to several applications in applied statistics, there is an increasing attention to the coefficient of variation (CV) in quality control. In this paper, we propose investigating the effect of measurement errors on the performance of one-sided cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts monitoring the CV. According to the simulated results, the precision and accuracy errors have considerable influence on the performance of the CUSUM control charts. It is also shown that increasing the number of times measuring an item in the linear covariate error model insignificantly improves the proposed chart performance

Disciplines :

Quantitative methods in economics & management

Author, co-author :

Tran, Phuong Hanh ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Recherche

Heuchenne, Cédric ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Opérations: Statistique appl. à la gest. et à l'économie

Language :

English

Title :

CUSUM control charts for the Coefficient of Variation with Measurement Errors

Publication date :

August 2019

Journal title :

IFAC-PapersOnLine

ISSN :

2405-8971

eISSN :

2405-8963

Publisher :

Elsevier, Kidlington, United Kingdom

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1884-1889

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896319314612?fbclid=IwAR3tI0K1nNCAwdBMBpd7T7cy_1oxp04lIfdpwIv-M0sgY24AwIjbmoHBheI

Available on ORBi :

since 03 December 2019

Statistics

Number of views

230 (32 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

22 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Amdouni, A., Castagliola, P., Taleb, H., and Celano, G. (2015). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart in short production runs. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1-4), 1-14.
Breunig, R. (2001). An almost unbiased estimator of the coefficient of variation. Economics Letters, 70(1), 15-19.
Brook, D. and Evans, D. (1972). An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run length. Biometrika, 59(3), 539-549.
Calzada, M. and Scariano, S.M. (2013). A synthetic control chart for the coefficient of variation. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(5), 853-867.
Castagliola, P., Achoure, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., and Psarakis, S. (2013a). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using control charts with run rules. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10, 75-94.
Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., and Psarakis, S. (2013b). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sampling interval control chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 29(8), 1135-1149.
Castagliola, P., Achouri, A., Taleb, H., Celano, G., and Psarakis, S. (2015a). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size control chart. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(9-12), 1561-1576.
Castagliola, P., Amdouni, A., Taleb, H., and Celano, G. (2011). Monitoring the coefficient of variation using ewma charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 43(3), 249-265.
Castagliola, P., Amdouni, A., Taleb, H., and Celano, G. (2015b). One-sided control shewhart type charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 12(1), 53-67.
Costa, A. and Castagliola, P. (2011). Effect of measurement error and autocorrelation on the X¯ chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(4), 661-673.
Hawkins, D. and Wu, Q. (2014). The CUSUM and the EWMA Head-to-Head. Quality Engineering, 26(2), 215-222.
Hu, X., Castagliola, P., Sun, J., and Khoo, M. (2015). The effect of measurement errors on the synthetic X¯ chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(8), 1769-1778.
Iglewicz, B. and Myers, R. (1970). Comparisons of approximations to the percentage points of the sample coefficient of variation. Technometrics, 12(1), 166-169.
Linna, K. and Woodall, W. (2001). Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control chart. Journal of Quality Technology, 33(2), 213-222.
Linna, K., Woodall, W., and Busby, K. (2001). The performance of multivariate control charts in the presence of measurement error. Journal of Quality Technology, 33(3), 349.
Maravelakis, P. (2012). Measurement error effect on the CUSUM control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(2), 323-336.
Montgomery, D. (2013). Statistical Quality Control: a Modern Introduction, 7th Edn. John Wiley & Sons,Hoboken, New Jersey.
Noorossana, R. and Zerehsaz, Y. (2015). Effect of measurement error on phase II monitoring of simple linear profiles. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79(9-12), 2031-2040.
Reh, W. and Scheffler, B. (1996). Significance tests and confidence intervals for coefficients of variation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 22(4), 449-452.
Tran, K., Castagliola, P., and Balakrishnan, N. (2016a). On the performance of shewhart median chart in the presence of measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. In press, DOI: 10.1002/qre.2087.
Tran, K., Castagliola, P., and Balakrishnan, N. (2018). On the performance of coefficient of variation charts in the presence of measurement errors. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, In press. doi: 10.1002/qre2402.
Tran, K., Castagliola, P., and Celano, G. (2016b). The performance of the Shewhart-RZ control chart in the presence of measurement error. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 7504-7522.
Tran, P. and Tran, K.P. (2016). The efficiency of CUSUM schemes for monitoring the coefficient of variation. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 32(6), 870-881.
Vangel, M. (1996). Confidence intervals for a normal coefficient of variation. American Statistician, 15, 21-26.
Yeong, W., Khoo, M., Lim, S., and Teoh, W. (2017). The coefficient of variation chart with measurement error. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 1-25.