Reference : Which justice models for the agro-ecological transitions?
Scientific conferences in universities or research centers : Scientific conference in universities or research centers
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/237761
Which justice models for the agro-ecological transitions?
English
[fr] Quels modèles de justice pour l'agroécologie
Stassart, Pierre M [Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Gouvernance de l'environnement >]
Dumont, Antoinette [Berkeley University of California - UC Berkeley > > > >]
Hecquet, Corentin mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Gouvernance de l'environnement >]
Klaedtke, Stéphanie mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Gouvernance de l'environnement >]
Lacombe, Camille [Institut Scientifique de Recherche Agronomique - INRA > SAD > AGIR > >]
de Nanteuil, Matthieu [Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL > > > >]
2019
International
Lecture
june 25th
French Institute Pondicherry
Pondicherry
India
[en] justice ; transition ; agroecology ; sustainability sciences ; transformative research ; recherche transformative
[fr] justice ; transition ; agroécologie
[en] There is no simple model of agroecological transition, and this is not only because it is located, complex, uncertain and undetermined pathways. Actors and their collectives, have different normative backgrounds to deal with the dilemma that agroecological transition rise. We seek to position ourselves from a theoretical point of view in a middle ground between a lack of normative framework and a deterministic approach where the transition possibilities of the actors are determined in a structuralist context. We problematize the normative frames of agroecology transitions by mobilizing the works of Mathieu de Nanteuil on “Justice at Work” and the different ethical model that he describes. Than we discuss three case study that illustrate three ethical dilemmas: compromise, capacity and recognition. The specificity of those case studies relies on their interdisciplinarity and transformative potential as well as their institutional setting (Belgium, France , Europe). From these three cases we underline that we cannot philosophically decide between these normative models, on the contrary, we must start pragmatically from the point of view of the actors. From this perspective, it is not so much the necessary presentation of the model that counts, but rather the resources it constitutes and from which actors will draw to achieve their agroecological transitions. What matters is to understand how actors struggle to establish their models.
SEED
Fédération Wallonie Bruxelles. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - F.R.S.-FNRS
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/237761

There is no file associated with this reference.

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.