Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

Lancellotti, Patrizio; Pibarot, P.; Picano, E.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20958-6_36

No full text

Contribution to collective works (Parts of books)

Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

Lancellotti, Patrizio; Pibarot, P.; Picano, E.

2015 • In stress echocardiography

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/228420

DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-20958-6_36

Files (0)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

No document available.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Abstract :

[en] Major advances in diagnosis and risk stratification, combined with enormous progress in surgical valve replacement and repair, have led to improved outcomes of patients with valvular heart disease over the past 30 years. The most important indication for surgical intervention in patients with hemodynamically significant aortic or mitral valve disease is the development of symptoms, as emphasized in recent guidelines [1–3]. As symptoms may develop slowly and indolently in these chronic conditions, many patients are unaware of subtle changes in effort tolerance, even when questioned directly by their physicians. Hence, recent guidelines of both the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [2, 3] have placed renewed emphasis on the role of exercise testing to provide objective evidence of exercise capacity and symptom status. In addition, while Doppler echocardiography is the method of choice for assessing severity of valvular disease, there is a growing utilization of stress two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography to assess dynamic changes in hemodynamics in concert with the clinical findings of exercise testing. © Springer International Publishing 2015.

Disciplines :

Cardiovascular & respiratory systems

Author, co-author :

Lancellotti, Patrizio ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Imagerie cardiaque fonctionnelle par échographie

Pibarot, P.; Québec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital Research Center, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada

Picano, E.; Biomedicine Department, CNR Pisa, Ist. Fisiologia Clinica, Pisa, Italy

Language :

English

Title :

Stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease

Publication date :

2015

Main work title :

stress echocardiography

Publisher :

Springer International Publishing

Pages :

585-609

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Commentary :

9783319209586; 9783319209579

Available on ORBi :

since 08 October 2018

Statistics

Number of views

63 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT et al (2002) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 106:1883–1892.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2438–2488.
Vahanian A, Alfi eri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 33:2451–2496.
Picano E (1992) Stress echocardiography. From pathophysiological toy to diagnostic tool. Circulation 85:1604–1612.
Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K et al (2003) ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 41:159–168.
Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al (2006) Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:1341–1381.
Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Rabinowitz B et al (1997) Stress echocardiography beyond coronary Artery disease. Eur Heart J 18(Suppl D):D130–D137.
Picano E, Pibarot P, Lancellotti P et al (2009) The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2251–2260.
Picano E, Pellikka PA (2014) Stress echo applications beyond coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 35:1033–1040.
Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA et al (2007) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1021–1041.
Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A et al (2008) Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr 9:415–437.
Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Kraft CD et al (1992) Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1160–1167.
Grayburn PA (2006) Assessment of low-gradient aortic stenosis with dobutamine. Circulation 113:604–606.
deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME et al (1995) Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol 75:191–194.
Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Moshkowitz Y et al (2001) Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy. Chest 119:1766–1777.
Nishimura RA, Grantham JA, Connolly HM et al (2002) Low-output, low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function: the clinical utility of the dobutamine challenge in the catheterization laboratory. Circulation 106:809–813.
Monin JL, Monchi M, Gest V et al (2001) Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction And low transvalvular pressure gradients: risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2101–2107.
Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M et al (2003) Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 108:319–324.
Zuppiroli A, Mori F, Olivotto I et al (2003) Therapeutic implications of contractile reserve elicited by dobutamine echocardiography in symptomatic, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Ital Heart J 4:264–270.
Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F et al (2006) Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 113:1738–1744.
Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A et al (1994) Safety and tolerability of dobutamine- atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 344:1190–1192.
Bountioukos M, Kertai MD, Schinkel AF et al (2003) Safety of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 12:441–446.
Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G et al (2006) Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation 113:711–721.
Bergler-Klein J, Mundigler G, Pibarot P et al (2007) B-type natriuretic peptide in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: relationship to hemodynamics and clinical outcome: results from the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) study. Circulation 115:2848–2855.
Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D et al (2004) Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcifi cation measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 110:356–362.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1845–1853.
Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E et al (2012) Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classifi cation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:235–243.
Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R et al (2012) Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1259–1267.
Clavel MA, Ennezat PV, Marechaux S et al (2013) Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis And preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:175–183.
Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME et al (1997) Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular Aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95:2262–2270.
Amato MC, Moffa PJ, Werner KE et al (2001) Treatment decision in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing. Heart 86:381–386.
Alborino D, Hoffmann JL, Fournet PC et al (2002) Value of exercise testing to evaluate the indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 2002(11):204–209.
Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J (2005) Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 26:1309–1313.
Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M et al (2005) Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 112:I377–I382.
Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A et al (2010) Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 31:1390–1397.
Donal E, Thebault C, O’Connor K et al (2011) Impact of aortic stenosis on longitudinal myocardial deformation during exercise. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:235–241.
Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E et al (2012) Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 126:851–859.
Borer JS, Bonow RO (2003) Contemporary approach to aortic and mitral regurgitation. Circulation 108:2432–2438.
Bonow RO, Picone AL, McIntosh CL et al (1985) Survival and functional results after valve replacement for aortic regurgitation from 1976 to 1983: impact of preoperative left ventricular function. Circulation 72:1244–1256.
Bonow RO, Dodd JT, Maron BJ et al (1988) Long-term serial changes in left ventricular function And reversal of ventricular dilatation after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. Circulation 78:1108–1120.
Wahi S, Haluska B, Pasquet A et al (2000) Exercise echocardiography predicts development of left ventricular dysfunction in medically and surgically treated patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation. Heart 84:606–614.
Espinola-Zavaleta N, Gomez-Nunez N, Chavez PY et al (2001) Evaluation of the response to pharmacological stress in chronic aortic regurgitation. Echocardiography 18:491–496.
Bonow RO, Lakatos E, Maron BJ et al (1991) Serial long-term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Circulation 84:1625–1635.
Tornos MP, Olona M, Permanyer-Miralda G et al (1995) Clinical outcome of severe asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation: a long-term prospective follow-up study. Am Heart J 130:333–339.
Borer JS, Hochreiter C, Herrold EM et al (1998) Prediction of indications for valve replacement Among asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation And normal left ventricular performance. Circulation 97:525–534.
Tarasoutchi F, Grinberg M, Spina GS et al (2003) Ten-year clinical laboratory follow-up after Application of a symptom-based therapeutic strategy to patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation of predominant rheumatic etiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1316–1324.
Lancellotti P, Magne J (2013) Stress echocardiography in regurgitant valve disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:840–849.
Hecker SL, Zabalgoitia M, Ashline P et al (1997) Comparison of exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessing mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 80:1374–1377.
Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Agranat O et al (2000) Impact of atrioventricular compliance on pulmonary artery pressure in mitral stenosis: an exercise echocardiographic study. Circulation 102:2378–2384.
Reis G, Motta MS, Barbosa MM et al (2004) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive Assessment and risk stratification of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:393–401.
Li M, Dumesnil JG, Mathieu P et al (2005) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1034–1040.
Brochet E, Detaint D, Fondard O et al (2011) Early hemodynamic changes versus peak values: what is more useful to predict occurrence of dyspnea during stress echocardiography in patients with asymptomatic mitral stenosis? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:392–398.
Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802.
Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D et al (2005) Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 352:875–883.
Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U et al (2006) Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 113:2238–2244.
Madaric J, Watripont P, Bartunek J et al (2007) Effect of mitral valve repair on exercise tolerance in asymptomatic patients with organic mitral regurgitation. Am Heart J 154:180–185.
Magne J, Lancellotti P, Pierard LA (2010) Exercise-induced changes in degenerative mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:300–309.
Magne J, Lancellotti P, Pierard LA (2010) Exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation. Circulation 122:33–41.
Magne J, Mahjoub H, Dulgheru R et al (2014) Left ventricular contractile reserve in asymptomatic primary mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J 35:1608–1616.
Naji P, Griffi n BP, Asfahan F et al (2014) Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with significant myxomatous mitral regurgitation undergoing exercise echocardiography. Circulation 129:1310–1319.
Tischler MD, Battle RW, Saha M et al (1995) Observations suggesting a high incidence of exercise-induced severe mitral regurgitation in patients with mild rheumatic mitral valve disease At rest. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:128–133.
Pierard LA, Lancellotti P (2004) The role of ischemic mitral regurgitation in the pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med 351:1627–1634.
Lancellotti P, Gerard PL, Pierard LA (2005) Long-term outcome of patients with heart failure And dynamic functional mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J 26:1528–1532.
Pierard LA, Lancellotti P (2006) Dyspnea and stress testing. N Engl J Med 354:871–873.
Pierard LA, Lancellotti P (2007) Stress testing in valve disease. Heart 83:766–772.
Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R et al (2004) American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:1086–1119.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2007) Prevention of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible? Heart 93:549–551.
Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R et al (2003) Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108:983–988.
Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG et al (2004) Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:149–159.
Mohty D, Malouf JF, Girard SE et al (2006) Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on longterm survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113:420–426.
Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Hettich I et al (2008) Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Heart 94:637–641.
Magne J, Mathieu P, Dumesnil JG et al (2007) Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival After mitral valve replacement. Circulation 115:1417–1425.
Wu WC, Ireland LA, Sadaniantz A (2004) Evaluation of aortic valve disorders using stress echocardiography. Echocardiography 21:459–466.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J et al (1999) Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1609–1617.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J et al (1999) Usefulness of the indexed effective orifi ce area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 83:542–546.
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2000) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1131–1141.
De Carlo M, Milano A, Musumeci G et al (1999) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with 21mm St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 8:522–528; discussion 528–529.
Tatineni S, Barner HB, Pearson AC et al (1989) Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Circulation 80:I16–I23.
van den Brink RB, Verheul HA, Visser CA et al (1992) Value of exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol 69:367–372.
Dressler FA, Labovitz AJ (1992) Exercise evaluation of prosthetic heart valves by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with catheterization studies. Echocardiography 9:235–241.
Wiseth R, Levang OW, Tangen G et al (1993) Exercise hemodynamics in small (< or = 21 mm) Aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 125:138–146.
Shigenobu M, Sano S (1995) Evaluation of St. Jude Medical mitral valve function by exercise Doppler echocardiography. J Card Surg 10:161–168.
Becassis P, Hayot M, Frapier JM et al (2000) Postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement by small-size prosthesis: functional consequence of small-size aortic prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:871–877.
Minardi G, Manzara C, Creazzo V et al (2006) Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Surg 1:27–33.
Hobson NA, Wilkinson GA, Cooper GJ et al (2006) Hemodynamic assessment of mitral mechanical prostheses under high flow conditions: comparison between dynamic exercise and dobutamine stress. J Heart Valve Dis 2006(15):87–91.
Magne J, Senechal M, Mathieu P et al (2008) Restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation may induce functional mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1692–1701.
Patsilinakos SP, Kranidis AI, Antonelis IP et al (1999) Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis with noninvasive methods. Angiology 50:309–317.
Picano E, Palinkas A, Amyot R (2001) Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 19:1177–1183.
Marcus ML, Doty DB, Hiratzka LF et al (1982) Decreased coronary reserve: a mechanism for angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 307:1362–1366.
Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Dutka DP et al (2002) Mechanisms of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Circulation 105:470–476.
Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Camici PG et al (2003) Functional changes in coronary microcirculation After valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 107:3170–3175.
Aminian A, Dolatabadi D, Lefebvre P et al (2014) Importance of guiding catheter disengagement during measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with an isolated proximal left Anterior descending artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:595–601.
Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O et al (2007) Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch And aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:790–796.
Meimoun P, Germain AL, Elmkies F et al (2012) Factors associated with noninvasive coronary flow reserve in severe aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:835–841.
Banovic M, Bosiljka VT, Voin B et al (2014) Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in Asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and nonobstructed coronary arteries. Echocardiography 31:428–433.
Camuglia AC, Syed J, Garg P et al (2014) Invasively assessed coronary flow dynamics improve following relief of aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1808–1809.
Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432–437.
Lee DC, Simonetti OP, Harris KR et al (2004) Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. Circulation 110:58–65.
Steadman CD, Jerosch-Herold M, Grundy B et al (2012) Determinants and functional significance of myocardial perfusion reserve in severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:182–189.
Rigo F, Richieri M, Pasanisi E et al (2003) Usefulness of coronary flow reserve over regional wall motion when added to dual-imaging dipyridamole echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 91:269–273.
Hildick-Smith DJ, Shapiro LM (2000) Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1889–1896.
Rigo F (2005) Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 3:8.
Bhattacharyya S, Kamperidis V, Shah BN et al (2013) Clinical utility and prognostic value of appropriateness criteria in stress echocardiography for the evaluation of valvular heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:987–992.
Garbi M, Chambers J, Vannan MA et al (2015) Valve stress echocardiography: A practical guide for referral, procedure, reporting and clinical implementation of results from the HAVEC group. JACC cardiov img 8:724–736.