<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T15:20:15Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:orbi.ulg.ac.be:2268/176592" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://orbi.uliege.be/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:orbi.ulg.ac.be:2268/176592</identifier><datestamp>2026-09-01T13:30:09Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_f00</setSpec><setSpec>col_f03</setSpec><setSpec>class_f08</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/ http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/ali.xsd http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:type xml:lang="en">doctoral thesis</dc:type>
<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis</dc:type>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">open access</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<ali:free_to_read ali:start_date="2015-01-15"/>
<ali:license_ref>https://orbi.uliege.be/page/user-license</ali:license_ref>
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Managing the carnivore comeback: assessing the adaptive capacity of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) to cohabit with humans in shared landscapes</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="fr">Gérer le retour des carnivores: Evaluation de la capacité du lynx boréal (Lynx lynx) à partager des territoires avec les hommes</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Bouyer, Yaëlle</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Poncin, Pascal</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Beudels, Roseline</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Linnell, John</dc:contributor>
<dc:date>2015-01-09</dc:date>
<dc:format>173</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/176592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>info:hdl:2268/176592</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/176592/1/Thesis_Bouyer_2015.pdf</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:subject>carnivore</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>habitat selection</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Lynx</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Life sciences</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Environmental sciences &amp; ecology</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="fr">Sciences du vivant</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="fr">Sciences de l’environnement &amp; écologie</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">Conflicts  between  humans  and  large  carnivores  are  one  of  the  most  visible  examples  of  the challenges that arise when seeking to achieve coexistence between humans and wildlife. With their large spatial requirements and predatory behavior, large carnivores are among the most difficult species to preserve in our modern day landscapes. Although large carnivores are usually considered  as  the  epitomes  of  wilderness,  because  of  human  population  growth  and  habitat fragmentation  they  are  inexorably  and  increasingly  faced  with  the  need  to  live  in  human-modified  landscapes.  As  a  direct  consequence,  conflicts  over  depredation  on  livestock, competition for game species and sometimes over human injury or death will only increase if clear management measures are not taken. This is particularly true in Europe, where, after many decades of absence, large carnivores are recolonizing areas where millions of people are present and where landscapes have been  drastically modified. Two approaches to integrating wildlife into a human-dominated world have been proposed at an international scale. The first solution is called land sparing, in which wildlife lives exclusively in protected or wilderness areas where contact  between  animals  and  humans  will  be  reduced  to  the  minimum.  The  second  solution, called land sharing, proposes to integrate human activities and wildlife in the same landscapes in non-protected  interface  zones  in  what  is  often  called  a  coexistence  approach.  In  a  context  of scarce true wilderness areas and a continuum of human-modified habitats, land sharing (i.e. the coexistence  approach)  is  seen  as  the  only  possible  approach  valid  for  Europe.  While  a coexistence approach can be readily implemented with smaller species, it can represent a major challenge  for  species  with  large  space  requirements  and  with  predatory  behavior.  To  help manage these species in a long-term conservation vision and to predict where potential conflicts could arise between humans and carnivores, information on large carnivores and their habitat use in anthropogenic landscapes is a pre-requisite.  &#xd;
With  the  return  of  Eurasian  lynx  Lynx  lynx  in  Western  Europe,  the  most  densely  populated areas of the continent_ information on the species tolerance to human land use will help predict where it is likely to occur in anthropogenic landscapes. Data collected in Scandinavia over 15 years were used to assess the use of landscape by lynx. In this study, we explored the effect of anthropogenic and environmental factors on Eurasian lynx habitat use in Scandinavia. The work was developed along two main axes. &#xd;
The  first  axis  aims  to  explore  large  scale  potential  patterns  of  lynx  distribution  through &#xd;
transferability  of  results  obtained  from  habitat  modelling  to  geographically  different  areas. Transferability of results was tested in two steps. Firstly, transferability success (i.e. predictive ability of the map) was tested at a regional scale using data on roe-deer, the main prey of lynx, to create a map of relative distribution and abundance of prey in southeastern Norway (Chapter 1). &#xd;
Secondly, transferability success was assessed at a larger extent and using data obtained from &#xd;
different sampling method (Chapter 2). A habitat suitability map for Eurasian lynx was produced to be used in management planning in geographically differentiated lynx management zones in Scandinavia.  The  results  indicated  that  transferability  of  results  from  one  region  to  an ecologically  different  region  must  be  taken  with  caution.  Nevertheless,  the  habitat  suitability maps we constructed on the basis of extrapolation are a valuable asset to help management of the Scandinavian lynx population.  The  second  axis  deals  with  lynx  habitat  use  in  relation  to  anthropogenic  and  environmental predictors. Lynx tolerance to human presence was first explored by looking at the orientation of home range in the landscape, taking into account proxies of human presence (Chapter 3). Values &#xd;
of these proxies were compared both inside home ranges and within a buffer surrounding the &#xd;
home ranges for several lynx inhabiting an anthropogenic gradient going from near-wilderness &#xd;
to urban periphery. Results showed a high diversity in the extent to which individual lynx are &#xd;
exposed to human influence, indicating that lynx are highly adaptable in terms of living space. &#xd;
Lynx seemed to be able to orientate their home range in order to avoid highest human impacts &#xd;
and select for areas of medium human impacts. Building on these results, finer scale information on  lynx  habitat  use  in  an  anthropogenic  landscape  were  obtained  taking  into  consideration different types of behavior (day-beds, moving and killing) displayed by adult lynx, as well as the effect  of  cumulative  anthropogenic  pressures  on  habitat  selection  (Chapter  4).  Our  results showed that lynx select for areas with medium levels of human modification, avoiding both the areas  with  highest  and  least  modification.  Females  in  general  appear  to  be  less  tolerant  to human modification than males, especially for day-beds.  &#xd;
Our study shows that Eurasian lynx can be considered as a species that is adaptable to human-&#xd;
induced changes in landscape even if its motivation to tolerate human presence is clearly linked &#xd;
to the presence and density level of its main prey, the roe deer. Our work shows that, contrary to much  of  the  public  and  many  conservation  professionals’  opinions,  land  sharing  with  large carnivores  in  Europe  may  be  possible  –  even  in  the  immediate  proximity  to  urban  centers. &#xd;
However, it is important to bear in mind that these results were obtained from countries with a &#xd;
relatively low human population density; even though some individuals observed lived in the &#xd;
periphery of large cities, the level of habitat fragmentation is less severe than in most of Western Europe.  In  order  to  properly  assess  the  capacity  of  Eurasian  lynx  to  live  in  highly  populated areas,  such  as  the  Benelux,  more  detailed  information  on  lynx  distribution  from  continental European  will  be  needed.  However,  our  results  underline  the  value  of  combining  both correlational and mechanistic studies, and the need for caution in extrapolating data too far from its original context. As large carnivore recovery continues to progress in Europe we may not yet have seen the limits of these species' abilities to adapt.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher>ULiège - Université de Liège</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>