[en] The goal of this paper is to contrast the representation of models in photography (fashion and fine art photography), as well as certain kinds of inanimate beauty (Barbie dolls, mannequins), with the average faces constructed by algorithms serving to identify and reproduce beauty. What are the similarities and differences between inanimate objects, characterized by faces devoid of singularities and comparable to sorts of angelic faces, and the algorithmic parameters through which beauty and attractiveness are calculated and predicted? This paper will apply an enunciative semiotic analysis to photographic corpora, propose philosophical reflections on the categories of beauty, and will show that the conception of beauty changes from corpus to corpus and from one cultural domain to the other (fine art, advertising, entertainment and so on). The end of the paper states that beauty has to do with a perfect gradation between stillness and movement in the case of the models seen in fashion photography, between neutrality and expressivity for mannequins, and between singularity and multiplicity for dolls such as Barbie, and that, in the algorithmic fabrication of beautiful faces, it is linked with an enhancement of the compactness of the structure of the face.
Centre de recherche :
Traverses - ULiège
Disciplines :
Art & histoire de l’art Langues & linguistique Philosophie & éthique
Basso Fossali P (2008) Vissuti di significazione. Temi per una semiotica viva. ETS, Pisa
Benveniste E (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale 2. Gallimard, Paris
Benveniste E (1981) The semiology of language. Semiotica 37:5–23
Beyaert A (2017) Sémiotique du portrait. De Dibutade au selfie. De Boeck, Louvain-La-Neuve
Cao K et al (2020) Deep learning for facial beauty prediction. Information 11(8):391. 10.3390/info11080391 DOI: 10.3390/info11080391
Cheng Fr (2006) Cinq méditations sur la beauté. Albin Michel, Paris
Coccia E (2015) «La morale della fotomodella. La mostra su Bettina Graziani alla Galleria Alaia», La parole et le cose. Letteratura e realtà. http://www.leparoleelecose.it/?p=17502. Accessed 21 Apr 2022
Coomaraswamy A (2017) Bellezza e verità. Saggi sull’arte cristiana e orientale. Luni Editrice, Milan
Dondero MG (2007) «Reproductibilité, faux parfaits et contrefaçons», Actes Sémiotiques [En ligne], https://www.unilim.fr/actes-semiotiques/3261. Accessed 1 Jan 2022
Dondero MG (2020) The language of images. The forms and the forces. Springer, Cham DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52620-7
Dondero MG (2021) Composition and decomposition in artistic portraits, scientific photography and in deepfake videos. Lexia Rivista Di Semiotica 37–38:437–453. 10.4399/978882553853321 DOI: 10.4399/978882553853321
Fontanille J (1989) Les espaces subjectifs. Introduction à la sémiotique de l’observateur. Hachette, Paris
Freud S (1919) The uncanny https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/freud1.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2022
Greimas AJ, Courtés J (1982) Semiotics and language: an analytical dictionary (advances in semiotics). Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Jentsch E (1906) On the psychology of the uncanny. New Ed. (1997), Angelaki 2 (1):7–16. http://www.art3idea.psu.edu/locus/Jentsch_uncanny.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022
Jullien F (2010) Cette étrange idée du beau Chantiers II. Grasset, Paris (Biblio essais, Poche)
Leyvand T et al (2008) Data-driven enhancement of facial attractiveness. ACM Trans Graphics. 10.1145/1360612.1360637 DOI: 10.1145/1360612.1360637
Marin L (1993) De la représentation. Seuil, Paris
Rilke RM (2013) Poupées. Rivages Poche, Paris
Roelens N (2017) La hantise du visage chez Roland Barthes et Gilles Deleuze. In: Guido L et al (eds) Visages: histoires, représentations, créations. BHMS, Lausanne, pp 71–88
Simms EM (1996) Uncanny dolls: images of death in Rilke and Freud. New Literary Hist Lit Media Law 27(4):663–677. DOI: 10.1353/nlh.1996.0056
Zhan et al (2020) Beauty is in the eye of the cultural beholder. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/34vsj
