Communication publiée sur un site web (Colloques et congrès scientifiques)
Without Any Prejudice? The Antitrust Implication of the AI Act
De Cooman, Jérôme
2022IAIL2022: Imagining the AI Landscape after the AI Act
Peer reviewed
 

Documents


Texte intégral
De_Cooman_Without-Any_Prejudice_CEUR_Proceedings_2022.pdf
Postprint Éditeur (575.77 kB) Licence Creative Commons - Attribution
Télécharger
Annexes
De_Cooman_Without_Any_Prejudice_09062022.pdf
(621.04 kB)
Télécharger

Tous les documents dans ORBi sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
Competition law; algorithmic screening; artificial intelligence; criminal law; quasi-criminal law; AI Act
Résumé :
[en] This research paper questions to what extent the AI Act allows for algorithmic regulation and decision-making to take shape in competition law. It first summarises the algorithmicising of competition law proceedings. It then discusses algorithmic decision-making under the AI Act. Annex III of the AI Act qualifies as high-risk AI systems intended to be used by law enforcement authorities in the course of detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences. As some EU Member States criminalised competition law, this would mean the AI Act might apply to AI systems used in competition proceedings. Competition law is, however, not qualified as criminal in all Member States. This paper therefore questions the opportunity to use the dichotomic relation between hard core and peripheral law developed by both the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. This paper argues, however, that such solution is doomed to failure. A contextual interpretation of the Proposal prevents any application of the AI Act to competition law through the back-door of peripheral criminal law. The paper concludes by imagining the competition landscape after the AI Act. On countries wherein competition law is criminal, national competition authorities will have to take that Regulation into account when developing AI systems that detect, investigate and prosecute competition infringements. As not all EU Member States have criminalised competition law, this would result in an imbalance between domestic legal orders that goes against the prime ambition of the AI Act, i.e., harmonisation.
Disciplines :
Droit européen & international
Auteur, co-auteur :
De Cooman, Jérôme  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Droit matériel européen
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Without Any Prejudice? The Antitrust Implication of the AI Act
Date de publication/diffusion :
13 juin 2022
Nom de la manifestation :
IAIL2022: Imagining the AI Landscape after the AI Act
Lieu de la manifestation :
Amsterdam, Pays-Bas
Date de la manifestation :
13 juin 2022
Manifestation à portée :
International
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Disponible sur ORBi :
depuis le 31 mai 2022

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
321 (dont 26 ULiège)
Nombre de téléchargements
155 (dont 8 ULiège)

citations Scopus®
 
0
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
0

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBi