Allometric above-ground biomass model; biomass changes; buttresses; close-range terrestrial photogrammetry; point of measurement of stem diameter; stem profile; taper; terrestrial laser scanning; structure form motion
Résumé :
[en] In tropical forests, the high proportion of trees showing irregularities at the stem base complicates forest monitoring. For example, in the presence of buttresses, the height of the point of measurement (HPOM) of the stem diameter (DPOM) is raised from 1.3 m, the standard breast height, up to a regular part of the stem. While DPOM is the most important predictor for tree aboveground biomass (AGB) estimates, the lack of harmonized HPOM for irregular trees in forest inventory increases the uncertainty in plot-level AGB stock and stock change estimates.
In this study, we gathered an original non-destructive 3D dataset collected with terrestrial laser scanning and close range terrestrial photogrammetry tools in three sites in central Africa. For the 228 irregularly shaped stems sampled, we developed a set of taper models to harmonize HPOM by predicting the equivalent diameter at breast height (DBH’) from a DPOM measured at any height. We analyzed the effect of using DBH’ on tree-level and plot-level AGB estimates. To do so, we used destructive AGB data for 140 trees and forest inventory data from eight 1-ha-plots in the Republic of Congo.
Our results showed that our best simple taper model predicts DBH’ with a relative mean absolute error of 3.7% (R²=0.98) over a wide DPOM range of 17 to 249 cm. Based on destructive AGB data, we found that the AGB allometric model calibrated with harmonized HPOM data was more accurate than the conventional local and pantropical models. At the plot level, the comparison of AGB stock estimates with and without HPOM harmonization showed an increasing divergence with the increasing share of irregular stems (up to -15%).
The harmonization procedure developed in this study could be implemented as a standard practice for AGB monitoring in tropical forests as no additional forest inventory measurements is required. This would probably lead to important revisions of the AGB stock estimates in regions having a large number of irregular tree stems and increase their carbon sink estimates. The growing use of 3D data offers new opportunities to extend our approach and further develop general taper models in other tropical regions.
Bastin, J.-F., et al. 2015. Seeing Central African forests through their largest trees. Scientific Reports 5:1–8.
Bauwens, S., and A. Fayolle. 2014. Protocole de collecte des données sur le terrain et au laboratoire nécessaires pour quantifier la biomasse aérienne des arbres et pour l’établissement d’équations allométriques (No. 029/COMIFAC/SE/PREREDD+/SPM/2013). Nature +. 39p. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/170397
Bauwens, S., A. Fayolle, S. Gourlet-Fleury, L. M. Ndjele, C. Mengal, and P. Lejeune. 2017. Terrestrial photogrammetry: a non-destructive method for modelling irregularly shaped tropical tree trunks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8:460–471.
Brown, S., A. J. Gillespie, and A. E. Lugo. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science 35:881–902.
Burkhart, H. E., and M. Tomé. 2012. Tree form and stem taper. Pages 9–41 in H. E. Burkhart and M. Tomé, editors. Modeling forest trees and stands. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Chave, J., et al. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99.
Chave, J., et al. 2014. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology 20:3177–3190.
Chave, J., R. Condit, S. Aguilar, A. Hernandez, S. Lao, and R. Perez. 2004. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359:409–420.
Chen, Q., R. E. McRoberts, C. Wang, and P. J. Radtke. 2016. Forest aboveground biomass mapping and estimation across multiple spatial scales using model-based inference. Remote Sensing of Environment 184:350–360.
Clark, D. B., and J. R. Kellner. 2012. Tropical forest biomass estimation and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Journal of Vegetation Science 23:1191–1196.
Cushman, K. C., H. C. Muller-Landau, R. S. Condit, and S. P. Hubbell. 2014. Improving estimates of biomass change in buttressed trees using tree taper models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:573–582.
Fayolle, A., et al. 2018. A regional allometry for the Congo basin forests based on the largest ever destructive sampling. Forest Ecology and Management 430:228–240.
Fayolle, A., J. L. Doucet, J. F. Gillet, N. Bourland, and P. Lejeune. 2013. Tree allometry in Central Africa: testing the validity of pantropical multi-species allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks. Forest Ecology and Management 305:29–37.
Forni, E., et al. 2019. Dispositifs permanents de nouvelle génération pour le suivi de la dynamique forestière en Afrique centrale: bilan en République du Congo. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 341:55–70.
Garber, S. M., and D. A. Maguire. 2003. Modeling stem taper of three central Oregon species using nonlinear mixed effects models and autoregressive error structures. Forest Ecology and Management 179:507–522.
Gibbs, H. K., S. Brown, J. O. Niles, and J. A. Foley. 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environmental Research Letters 2:045023.
Gonzalez de Tanago, J., et al. 2018. Estimation of above-ground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9:223–234.
Goodman, R. C., O. L. Phillips, and T. R. Baker. 2014. The importance of crown dimensions to improve tropical tree biomass estimates. Ecological Applications 24:680–698.
Higuchi, N., J. dos Santos, R. J. Ribeiro, L. Minette, and Y. Biot. 1998. Biomassa da parte aérea da vegetação da Floresta Tropical úmida de terra-firme da Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica 28:153.
Lau, A., K. Calders, H. Bartholomeus, C. Martius, P. Raumonen, M. Herold, M. Vicari, H. Sukhdeo, J. Singh, and R. C. Goodman. 2019. Tree biomass equations from terrestrial LiDAR: a case study in Guyana. Forests 10 527.
Lejeune, G., C.-H. Ung, M. Fortin, X. J. Guo, M.-C. Lambert, and J.-C. Ruel. 2009. A simple stem taper model with mixed effects for boreal black spruce. European Journal of Forest Research 128 505–513.
Ligot, G., S. Gourlet-Fleury, D. Y. Ouédraogo, X. Morin, S. Bauwens, F. Baya, Y. Brostaux, J. L. Doucet, and A. Fayolle. 2018. The limited contribution of large trees to annual biomass production in an old-growth tropical forest. Ecological Applications 28:1273–1281.
Lutz, J. A., A. J. Larson, M. E. Swanson, and J. A. Freund. 2012. Ecological importance of large-diameter trees in a temperate mixed-conifer forest. PLoS ONE 7:e36131.
McRoberts, R. E. 2010. Probability- and model-based approaches to inference for proportion forest using satellite imagery as ancillary data. Remote Sensing of Environment 114:1017–1025.
McRoberts, R. E., E. O. Tomppo, and E. Næsset. 2010. Advances and emerging issues in national forest inventories. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 25:368–381.
Mitchard, E. T., T. R. Feldpausch, R. J. Brienen, G. Lopez-Gonzalez, A. Monteagudo, T. R. Baker, S. L. Lewis, J. Lloyd, C. A. Quesada, and M. Gloor. 2014. Markedly divergent estimates of A mazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23:935–946.
Mitchard, E. T., S. S. Saatchi, A. Baccini, G. P. Asner, S. J. Goetz, N. L. Harris, and S. Brown. 2013. Uncertainty in the spatial distribution of tropical forest biomass: a comparison of pan-tropical maps. Carbon Balance and Management 8:10.
Molto, Q., V. Rossi, and L. Blanc. 2013. Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4:175–183.
Muller-Landau, H. C., M. Detto, R. A. Chisholm, S. P. Hubbell, and R. I. C. H. A. R. D. Condit. 2014. Detecting and projecting changes in forest biomass from plot data. Forests and Global Change 17:381–416.
Ngomanda, A., Q. M. Mavouroulou, N. L. E. Obiang, D. M. Iponga, J.-F. Mavoungou, N. Lépengué, N. Picard, and B. Mbatchi. 2012. Derivation of diameter measurements for buttressed trees, an example from Gabon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28:299–302.
Nogueira, E. M., P. M. Fearnside, B. W. Nelson, R. I. Barbosa, and E. W. H. Keizer. 2008. Estimates of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: New allometric equations and adjustments to biomass from wood-volume inventories. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1853–1867.
Overman, J. P. M., H. J. L. Witte, and J. G. Saldarriaga. 1994. Evaluation of regression models for above-ground biomass determination in Amazon rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10:207–218.
Pan, Y., et al. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993.
Panzou, G. J. L., G. Ligot, S. Gourlet-Fleury, J.-L. Doucet, E. Forni, J.-J. Loumeto, and A. Fayolle. 2018. Architectural differences associated with functional traits among 45 coexisting tree species in Central Africa. Functional Ecology 32:2583–2593.
Phillips, O. L., and S. L. Lewis. 2014. Evaluating the tropical forest carbon sink. Global Change Biology 20:2039–2041.
Picard, N., and S. Gourlet-Fleury. 2008. Manuel de référence pour l’installation de dispositifs permanents en forêt de production dans le bassin du Congo. Page 265. COMIFAC, Yaounde, Cameroon. http://hal.cirad.fr/cirad-00339816
Picard, N., E. Rutishauser, P. Ploton, A. Ngomanda, and M. Henry. 2015. Should tree biomass allometry be restricted to power models? Forest Ecology and Management 353:156–163.
Piñeiro, G., S. Perelman, J. P. Guerschman, and J. M. Paruelo. 2008. How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecological Modelling 216:316–322.
Pinheiro, J., and D. Bates. 2006. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer, New York, USA.
Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar, and R. C. Team. 2012. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html
Ploton, P., et al. 2016. Closing a gap in tropical forest biomass estimation: taking crown mass variation into account in pantropical allometries. Biogeosciences 13:1571–1585.
Ploton, P., et al. 2020. A map of African humid tropical forest aboveground biomass derived from management inventories. Scientific Data 7:221.
Réjou-Méchain, M., A. Tanguy, C. Piponiot, J. Chave, and B. Hérault. 2017. biomass: an r package for estimating above-ground biomass and its uncertainty in tropical forests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8:1163–1167.
Slik, J. W. F., et al. 2013. Large trees drive forest aboveground biomass variation in moist lowland forests across the tropics. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22:1261–1271.
Talbot, J., et al. 2014. Methods to estimate aboveground wood productivity from long-term forest inventory plots. Forest Ecology and Management 320:30–38.
Tasissa, G., and H. E. Burkhart. 1998. An application of mixed effects analysis to modeling thinning effects on stem profile of loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management 103:87–101.
Verbeeck, H., M. Bauters, T. Jackson, A. Shenkin, M. Disney, and K. Calders. 2019. Time for a plant structural economics spectrum. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2:43.
Wagenmakers, E.-J., and S. Farrell. 2004. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11:192–196.
West, P. W., D. A. Ratkowsky, and A. W. Davis. 1984. Problems of hypothesis testing of regressions with multiple measurements from individual sampling units. Forest Ecology and Management 7:207–224.
Zhao, F., Q. Guo, and M. Kelly. 2012. Allometric equation choice impacts lidar-based forest biomass estimates: A case study from the Sierra National Forest, CA. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 165:64–72.