[en] Many geophysical inverse problems are ill-posed and their solution non-unique. It is thus important to reduce the amount of mathematical solutions to more geologically plausible models by regularizing the inverse problem and incorporating all available prior information in the inversion process. We compare three different ways to incorporate prior information for electrical resistivity tomography (ERT): using a simple reference model or adding structural constraints to Occam's inversion and using geostatistical constraints. We made the comparison on four real cases representing different field applications in terms of scales of investigation and level of heterogeneities. In those cases, when electromagnetic logging data are available in boreholes to control the solution, it appears that incorporating prior information clearly improves the correspondence with logging data compared to the standard smoothness constrain. However, the way to incorporate it may have a major impact on the solution. A reference model can often be used to constrain the inversion; however, it can lead to misinterpretation if its weight is too strong or the resistivity values inappropriate. When the computation of the vertical and/or horizontal correlation length is possible, the geostatistical inversion gives reliable results everywhere in the section. However, adding geostatistical constraints can be difficult when there is not enough data to compute correlation lengths. When a known limit between two layers exists, the use of structural constrain seems to be more indicated particularly when the limit is located in zones of low sensitivity for ERT. This work should help interpreters to include their prior information directly into the inversion process through an appropriate way.
Archie G.E. 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers 146, 54-62.
Aster R.C., Borchers B. and Thurber C. 2005. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
Blakely R.J. 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Blaschek R., Hördt A. and Kemna A. 2008. A new sensitivity- controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization based on the minimum gradient support. Geophysics 73(2), F45-F54.
Bouchedda A., Chouteau M., Binley A. and Giroux B. 2012. 2-D joint structural inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground penetrating radar data. Journal of Applied Geophysics 78, 52-67.
Cardarelli E. and Fischanger F. 2006. 2D data modelling by electrical resistivity tomography for complex subsurface geology. Geophysical Prospecting 54, 121-133.
Caterina D., Beaujean, J., Robert, T. and Nguyen, F. 2013. A comparison study of image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics 11, 639-657.
Chasseriau P. and Chouteau M. 2003. 3D gravity inversion using a model of parameter covariance. Journal of Applied Geophysics 52, 59-74. (Pubitemid 36011061)
Constable S.C., Parker R.L. and Constable C.G. 1987. Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52, 289-300.
Dahlin T. and Zhou B. 2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with ten electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting 52, 379-398. (Pubitemid 39169060)
Daily W.D., Ramirez A.L. and Johnson R. 1998. Electrical impedance tomography of a perchloroethelyne release. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2, 189-201.
de Groot-Hedlin C. and Constable S. 1990. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 55, 1613-1624.
Doetsch J., Linde N., Coscia I., Greenhalgh S.A. and Green A.G. 2010. Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data. Geophysics 75(6), G53-G64.
Doetsch J., Linde N., Pessognelli M., Green A.G. and Günther T. 2012. Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization. Journal of Applied Geophysics 78, 68-76. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.04.008.
Elwaseif M. and Slater L. 2010. Quantifying tomb geometries in resistivity images using watershed algorithms. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 1424-1436.
Farquharson C.G. and Oldenburg D.W. 1998. Nonlinear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophysical Journal International 134, 213-227.
Gallardo L.A. and Meju M.A., 2003. Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data. Geophysical Research Letters 30(13), 1658-1661. doi: 10.1029/2003GL017370
Günther T. and Rücker C. 2006. A general approach for introducing information into inversion and examples from DC resistivity inversion. Near Surface 2006, Helsinki, Finland, Expanded Abstract, P039.
Halihan T., McDonald S.W. and Patey P. 2011. ERI evaluation of injectates used to remediate a dry cleaning site, Jackson, Tennessee. Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 24, 148.
Hermans T., Vandenbohede A., Lebbe L. and Nguyen F. 2012a. A shallow geothermal experiment in a sandy aquifer monitored using electric resistivity tomography. Geophysics 77(1), B11-B21, doi:10.1190/GEO2011-0199.1.
Hermans T., Vandenbohede A., Lebbe L., Martin R., Kemna A., Beaujean J. and Nguyen F. 2012b. Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data. Journal of Hydrology 438-439, 168-180. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2012.03.021.
Hu W., Abubakar A. and Habashy T.M. 2009. Joint electromagnetic and seismic inversion using structural constraints. Geophysics 74(6), R99-R109.
Johnson T.C., Routh P.S., Clemo T., Barrash W. and Clement W.P. 2007. Incorporating geostatistical constraints in nonlinear inversion problems. Water Resources Research 43, W10422. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005185. (Pubitemid 350210169)
Kaipio J.P., Kolehmainen V., Vauhkonen M. and Somersalo E. 1999. Inverse problems with structural prior information. Inverse Problems 15, 713-729. (Pubitemid 129561610)
Kemna A. 2000. Tomographic inversion of complex resistivity - theory and application. PhD thesis. Ruhr-University of Bochum.
LaBrecque D.J., Miletto M., Daily W., Ramirez A. and Owen E. 1996. The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics 61(2), 538-548.
Lelièvre P., Oldenburg D. and Williams N. 2009. Integrating geologic and geophysical data through advanced constrained inversions. Exploration Geophysics 40(4), 334-341.
Linde N., Binley A., Tryggvason A., Pedersen L.B. and Révil A. 2006. Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground-penetrating radar traveltime data. Water Resources Research 42, W12404. doi: 10.1029/2006WR0055131
Loke M.H., Acworth I. and Dahlin T., 2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics 34, 182-187.
Lucius J., Olhoeft G., Hill P. and Duke S. 1992. Properties and hazards of 108 selected substances. USGS Open-File Report 92-527.
Menke W. 1984. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. Elsevier, New-York.
Newmark R., Daily W.D., Kyle K.R. and Ramirez A.L. 1997. Monitoring DNAPL pumping using integrated geophysical techniques. Report UCRL-ID-122215. Livermore, Calif.: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Nguyen F., Garambois S., Jongmans D., Pirard E. and Loke M.H. 2005. Image processing of 2D resistivity data for imaging faults. Journal of Applied Geophysics 57, 260-277. (Pubitemid 40875978)
Oldenburg D.W., McGillivray P.R. and Ellis R.G. 1993. Generalized Subspace Methods For Large-Scale Inverse Problems. Geophysical Journal International 114(1), 12-20. (Pubitemid 23394825)
Oldenburg D.W. and Li Y. 1994. Subspace linear inverse method. Inverse Problems 10, 1-21.
Pidlisecky A., Haber E. and Knight R. 2007. RESINVM3D: A 3D resistivity inversion package. Geophysics 72(2), H1-H10. (Pubitemid 46403872)
Robert T., Dassargues A., Brouyère S., Kaufman O., Hallet V. and Nguyen F. 2011. Assessing the contribution of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self-potential methods for a water well drilling program in fractured/karstified limestones. Journal of Applied Geophysics 75(1), 42-53.
Saunders J.H., Herwanger J.V., Pain C.C. and Wothington M.H. 2005. Constrained resistivity inversion using seismic data. Geophysical Journal International 160, 785-796. (Pubitemid 40435961)
Schön J.H. 2004. Physical Properties of Rock. In: Physical Properties of Rock, Vol. 18, (ed. E.K. Helbig and S.Treitel). Elsevier.
Scott J.B.T., Barker R.D. and Peacock S. 2000. Combined seismic refraction and electrical imaging. 6th Meeting of the European Association for Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Bochum, Germany, Expanded Abstract, EL05.
Slater L., Binley A.M., Daily W. and Johnson R. 2000. Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics 44, 85-102. (Pubitemid 30327790)
Tikhonov A.N. and Arsenin V.A. 1977. Solution of Ill-posed Problems. Winston & Sons, Washington.
Vandenbohede A., Lebbe L., Gysens S., Delecluyse K. and DeWolf P. 2008. Salt water infiltration in two artificial sea inlets in the Belgian dune area. Journal of Hydrology 360, 77-86.
Vandenbohede A., Hermans T., Nguyen F. and Lebbe L. 2011. Shallow heat injection and storage experiment: heat transport simulation and sensitivity analysis. Journal of Hydrology 409, 262-272. doi:10.1016/j. jhydrol.2011.08.024
Wijns C., Boschetti F. and Moresi L. 2003. Inverse modelling in geology by interactive evolutionary computation. Journal of Structural Geology 25, 1615-1621. doi:10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00010-5 (Pubitemid 36947180)
Yeh T.-C.J., Liu S., Glass R.J., Baker K., Brainard J.R., Alumbaugh D. and LaBrecque D. 2002. A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology. Water Resource Research 38(12). doi: 10.1029/2001WR001204.
Yeh T.-C.J., Zhu J., Englert A., Guzman A. and Flaherty S. 2006. A successive linear estimator for electrical resistivity tomography. In: Applied Hydrogeophysics, (eds H. Vereecken, A. Binley, G. Cassiani, A. Revil and K. Titov). NATO Science Series, Springer.