References of "Richelle, Isabelle"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailProcedural Law in Tax Law – Belgian Report
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in Procedural Law in Tax Law (in press)

Detailed reference viewed: 108 (33 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2017 on the Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 16 May 2017 in Berlioz Investment Fund SA (Case C-682/15), Concerning the Right to Judicial Review under Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Cases of Cross-Border Mutual Assistance in Tax Matters
CFE ECJ Task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2018), 58(2018), 23

Berlioz Investment Fund SA (Case C-682/15), Concerning the Right to Judicial Review under Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Cases of Cross-Border Mutual Assistance in Tax Matters

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailBelgium
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege; Traversa, Edoardo

in Lang, Michael; Owens, Jeffrey; Pistone, Pasquale (Eds.) et al The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Taxation (2017)

The tax aspects of bilateral investment treaties, which, in most cases, provide the investor with the unique opportunity to directly initiate an international dispute settlement process – also known as ... [more ▼]

The tax aspects of bilateral investment treaties, which, in most cases, provide the investor with the unique opportunity to directly initiate an international dispute settlement process – also known as investor-state dispute settlement – are often overlooked. The increasing number of tax-related investment disputes is a clear indicator of an urgent need to identify and examine the issues emerging in this area in an academic context. The aim of this book is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between taxation and bilateral investment treaties. Twenty-one national reports from countries across the globe have been compiled in this volume. The reports, prepared for the conference “The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Taxation”, which took place in Rust (Austria) from 2-4 July 2015, help bring to light tax aspects of bilateral investment treaties that have significant unexplored aspects. Tax academics and tax practitioners, along with investment law academics and practitioners, provided their input. A major focus is the attitude taken towards tax matters in the bilateral investment treaties of reporting countries, as is the relationship between double tax treaties and bilateral investment treaties. In addition to the national aspects, the book also outlines global trends and best practices, and in doing so it aims to analyse the consistency of existing policies with the international obligations undertaken in bilateral investment treaties. The general report elaborates extensively on issues connected with tax carve-out provisions in bilateral investment treaties and the arbitration of tax matters. This book is of relevance to practitioners and academics working in tax law and international investment law, as well as students doing research and all who have an interest in the most current issues in these fields of law. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2017 on the ECJ Decision of 21 December 2016 in World Duty Free Group and Others (Joined Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P), Concerning the Requirements of Selective Aid in the Sense of Article 107 of the TFEU
CFE ECJ task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2017), (2017), 354-357

This CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the European Institutions on 29 June 2017, discusses World Duty Free Group (formerly Autogrill España); Banco Santander and Santusa Holding (Joined Cases C-20/15 P ... [more ▼]

This CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the European Institutions on 29 June 2017, discusses World Duty Free Group (formerly Autogrill España); Banco Santander and Santusa Holding (Joined Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P), wherein the ECJ held that that an aid can be regarded as selective if the national tax measure deviates from the reference framework: it is not necessary to show that the national tax measure actually favours a specific group of undertakings or the production of specific goods. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 14 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailActualités fiscales européennes: impacts sur les impôts directs en Belgique
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, June 12)

Actualités en matière de fiscalité européenne - 2016/2017 - Conférence donnée avec Prof. E. Traversa et M. Giffoni

Detailed reference viewed: 26 (4 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2017 on the Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in SECIL (Case C-464/14) Concerning the Free Movement of Capital and Third Countries
CFE ECJ task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2017), (2017), 163-172

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on SECIL (Case C-464/14), in which the 5th Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 24 November ... [more ▼]

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on SECIL (Case C-464/14), in which the 5th Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 24 November 2016,1 following the Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet of 27 January 2016.2 The case concerned the discriminatory Portuguese taxation of dividends received by corporate shareholders from their subsidiaries in third states, namely in Lebanon and Tunisia. In a clear and instructive decision, the Court not only clarified the scope and impact of the Treaty provisions on the free movement of capital, but also the legal ramifications of the Euro- Mediterranean Agreements with Lebanon and Tunisia. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detail« Traitement fiscal des dividendes – Fiscalité européenne et droit comparé »
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege; Malherbe, Jacques

in Annunziata, Filippo (Ed.) Le droit comparé des affaires au XXIème siècle – Mélanges à la mémoire de Claude Ducouloux (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 53 (8 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailL’impôt des sociétés dans une perspective internationale : entre concurrence et convergence
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Scientific conference (2017, February 23)

Réformer l’imposition des sociétés implique de tenir compte de sa place dans le système fiscal. L’on songe à l’articulation avec l’impôt des personnes physiques, auquel sont soumis les entreprises ... [more ▼]

Réformer l’imposition des sociétés implique de tenir compte de sa place dans le système fiscal. L’on songe à l’articulation avec l’impôt des personnes physiques, auquel sont soumis les entreprises personnelles et les actionnaires individuels. Par ailleurs, est également abordée la question de l’efficacité des incitants fiscaux à l’Isoc, notamment en matière d’investissement, de recherche ou d’environnement. - Les mutations du cadre fiscal international réduisent fortement la marge de manœuvre du législateur belge. Les initiatives de l’OCDE (BEPS) et de l’Union européenne obligent la Belgique à repenser sa politique dite « de niches fiscales » et pourraient déboucher vers une plus forte convergence des systèmes fiscaux. En parallèle, il faut tenir compte des réformes mises en œuvre dans les autres Etats européens, qui eux aussi cherchent à s’adapter au nouveau contexte tout en restant compétitifs [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 49 (7 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2016 on the Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 13 July 2016 in Brisal and KBC Finance Ireland (Case C-18/15), on the Admissibility of Gross Withholding Tax of Interest
CFE ECJ task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2017), 2017

This Opinion Statement of the CFE ECJ Task Force analyses the ECJ’ s decision in Brisal and KBC Finance Ireland (Case C-18/15) of 13 July 2016. Following a Portuguese reference for a preliminary ruling ... [more ▼]

This Opinion Statement of the CFE ECJ Task Force analyses the ECJ’ s decision in Brisal and KBC Finance Ireland (Case C-18/15) of 13 July 2016. Following a Portuguese reference for a preliminary ruling, the Court’ s decision provides further clarification on the permissibility of withholding taxation within the European Union. In relation to interest, the Court held that non-resident taxpayers may be subject to withholding taxes (even if comparable residents pursuing the same activity are not) but that non-residents may nevertheless not be taxed on gross income (when comparable residents are taxed on net profits) and are, therefore, entitled to deduct expenses directly connected to their business activity [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (7 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailActualités en fiscalitéeuropéenne et internationale: impact international de la future réforme de l'ISOC en Belgique
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege; Van de Velden, Kim

Scientific conference (2017)

First comments on the corporate tax reform project, in an international and european perspective.

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (0 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailArticle 8 OECD MC: Place of effective management versus residence
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Scientific conference (2016, November 21)

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (3 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailState Aid Law and Business Taxation
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege; Schön, Wolfgang; Traversa, Edoardo

Book published by Springer - 1ère éd. (2016)

This book is a compilation of contributions exploring the impact of the European Treaty provisions regarding state aid on Member States’ legislation and administrative practice in the area of business ... [more ▼]

This book is a compilation of contributions exploring the impact of the European Treaty provisions regarding state aid on Member States’ legislation and administrative practice in the area of business taxation. Starting from a detailed analysis of the European Courts’ jurisprudence on Art.107 TFEU the authors lay out fundamental issues – e.g. on legal concepts like “advantage”, “selectivity” and “discrimination” – and explore current problems – in particular policy and practice regarding “harmful” tax competition within the European Union. This includes the Member States’ Code of Conduct on business taxation, the limits to anti-avoidance legislation and the options for legislation on patent boxes. The European Commission’s recent findings on preferential “rulings” are discussed as well as the general relationship between international tax law, transfer pricing standards and the European prohibition on selective fiscal aids. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 57 (4 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailActualités fiscales européennes: impacts sur les impôts directs en Belgique
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Conference (2016, October 29)

actualités en matière de fiscalité européenne - impôts directs

Detailed reference viewed: 24 (4 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCFE Forum 2016: Rebuilding International Taxation – How To Square the Circle?
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege; Gerzova, Larisa; Popa, Oana et al

in European Taxation (2016)

In this note, the authors provide a summary of the presentations made at the CFE Forum 2016 held in Brussels on 21 April 2016.

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (1 ULiège)
See detailEU laws and policies
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Conference given outside the academic context (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (2 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2016 on the Decision of the European Court of Justice in Joined Cases Miljoen (Case C-10/14), X (Case C-14/14) and Société Générale (Case C-17/14) on the Netherlands Dividend Withholding Tax
CFE ECJ Task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2016)

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Miljoen and others (Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14),1 in respect of which the Third Chamber of the Court of Justice of the ... [more ▼]

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Miljoen and others (Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14),1 in respect of which the Third Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 17 September 2015, following the Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen of 25 June 2015.2 The cases concern the taxation of dividends received by individual and corporate non-resident taxpayers. They answer several questions in respect of the appropriateness of levying dividend withholding taxes, such as the need to allow for an offset against ordinary income tax, the deductibility of related costs and the relevance of an offset granted by a tax treaty. After illustrating the factual background, parties’ arguments and the ECJ’ s decision, this Opinion Statement will focus on issues that the ECJ has left open. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 4/2015 on the Decision of the European Court of Justice in Groupe Steria SCA (Case C-386/14), on the French Intégration Fiscale
CFE ECJ Task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2016)

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Groupe Steria SCA (Case C-386/14),1 in respect of which the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered ... [more ▼]

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Groupe Steria SCA (Case C-386/14),1 in respect of which the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 2 September 2015, following the Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 11 June 2015.2 The decision, which has also been the subject of an ECJ Press Release,3 further interprets the freedom of establishment in the context of the French intégration fiscale and clarifies that taxpayers can claim some benefits of a group taxation regime even if EU law would not allow for the full benefit of such a regime. It also confirms that an option granted to Member States under secondary EU legislation cannot justify a breach of the fundamental freedoms. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 10 (1 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 2/2015 on the Decision of the European Court of Justice in European Commission v. United Kingdom (“Final Losses”) (Case C-172/13), Concerning the “Marks & Spencer Exception”
CFE ECJ Task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2016), (2016/2-3), 87-93

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force concerning the decision given by the ECJ in European Commission v. United Kingdom (“Final Losses”) (Case C-172/13), on 3 February 2015. This ... [more ▼]

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force concerning the decision given by the ECJ in European Commission v. United Kingdom (“Final Losses”) (Case C-172/13), on 3 February 2015. This case is in some ways a follow-up to the ECJ’ s decision in Marks & Spencer (Case C-446/03) and comments on whether the legislative amendments introduced by the United Kingdom are sufficient to ensure compliance with EU law. After illustrating the case, arguments of the parties and decision of the Court, this Opinion Statement focuses on selected critical points from the Court’ s decision and Advocate General Kokott’ s Opinion [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (1 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2015 on the Decision of the European Court of Justice in C.G. Sopora (Case C-512/13), on “Horizontal Discrimination”
CFE ECJ Task Force; Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

in European Taxation (2016)

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on C.G. Sopora (Case C-512/13), which was decided by the Grand Chamber of the ECJ on 24 February 2015.

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 ULiège)
See detailDirect tax harmonisation history since 1957
Richelle, Isabelle ULiege

Scientific conference (2016, January 14)

Detailed reference viewed: 35 (2 ULiège)