![]() ; Baye, Ariane ![]() Report (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 10 (1 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Book published by Peter Lang (2015) Comment évaluer une compétence ? Comment garantir que la performance d’un individu dans une situation d’évaluation se répétera dans une autre situation ? Ces questions sont au cœur du présent ouvrage ... [more ▼] Comment évaluer une compétence ? Comment garantir que la performance d’un individu dans une situation d’évaluation se répétera dans une autre situation ? Ces questions sont au cœur du présent ouvrage, réécriture d’une thèse de doctorat en sciences de l’éducation consacrée à l’évaluation des compétences professionnelles. On y suit l’évolution d’une réflexion scientifique à propos des notions et présupposés théoriques qui fondent les recommandations méthodologiques en matière d’évaluation des compétences. Au fil de l’ouvrage, cette réflexion instaure un va-et-vient continu entre la littérature relative à ces questions et une démarche expérimentale appelant des analyses qualitatives et des analyses quantitatives à propos des idées et concepts issus de cette littérature. Deux dimensions sont particulièrement discutées : la notion de famille de situations et le lien présupposé entre performance et réflexivité. Dans ce cadre, les apports du courant de la didactique professionnelle sur la question de l’évaluation des compétences sont mis à l’épreuve. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 220 (3 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() ![]() ![]() in Education & Formation (2014), e-302 Detailed reference viewed: 298 (20 ULiège)![]() Blondin, Christiane ![]() ![]() Report (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 117 (10 ULiège)![]() Baye, Ariane ![]() ![]() ![]() Report (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 307 (38 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() ![]() Report (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 57 (12 ULiège)![]() Lafontaine, Dominique ![]() ![]() ![]() Conference (2013, August 31) In French-speaking Belgium, about 4% of the children are retained in kindergarten. What are the pupils’ characteristics and the school context variables predictive of the retention in kindergarten? What ... [more ▼] In French-speaking Belgium, about 4% of the children are retained in kindergarten. What are the pupils’ characteristics and the school context variables predictive of the retention in kindergarten? What are the pathways in primary education of “retained” pupils compared to their peers who started 1st grade “on time”? How can this early retention be explained? A broad database with entire cohorts has been used for studying the risk factors and the pupils’ school careers in primary education. Moreover, teachers’ beliefs about retention, learning and teaching have been investigated through a questionnaire administered to a representative sample of preschool and 1st grade teachers. The multilevel regression analyses show that the following variables are significantly predictive of retention in kindergarten: month of birth, gender, socioeconomic status, country of birth and at the school level, mean school social intake. Investigation about teachers’ belief shows that the vast majority of teachers are convinced that retention in kindergarten is beneficial for later achievement and not detrimental at a psychological level. Preschool and 1st grade teachers share some mutual expectations about the level of prerequisites for entering 1st grade. Even if they are no formal instructions or benchmarks, kids who are not “ready” should not enter 1st grade, but rather stay one more year in kindergarten. Those results can be related to the “culture” of the education system in Belgium, a non-comprehensive one: pupils with learning difficulties are kept apart from their age group or peers through grade retention, early tracking and special education. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 59 (6 ULiège)![]() Lafontaine, Dominique ![]() ![]() Conference (2013, August 31) In French-speaking Belgium, about 4% of the children are retained in kindergarten. What are the pupils’ characteristics and the school context variables predictive of the retention in kindergarten? What ... [more ▼] In French-speaking Belgium, about 4% of the children are retained in kindergarten. What are the pupils’ characteristics and the school context variables predictive of the retention in kindergarten? What are the pathways in primary education of “retained” pupils compared to their peers who started 1st grade “on time”? How can this early retention be explained? A broad database with entire cohorts has been used for studying the risk factors and the pupils’ school careers in primary education. Moreover, teachers’ beliefs about retention, learning and teaching have been investigated through a questionnaire administered to a representative sample of preschool and 1st grade teachers. The multilevel regression analyses show that the following variables are significantly predictive of retention in kindergarten: month of birth, gender, socioeconomic status, country of birth and at the school level, mean school social intake. Investigation about teachers’ belief shows that the vast majority of teachers are convinced that retention in kindergarten is beneficial for later achievement and not detrimental at a psychological level. Preschool and 1st grade teachers share some mutual expectations about the level of prerequisites for entering 1st grade. Even if they are no formal instructions or benchmarks, kids who are not “ready” should not enter 1st grade, but rather stay one more year in kindergarten. Those results can be related to the “culture” of the education system in Belgium, a non-comprehensive one: pupils with learning difficulties are kept apart from their age group or peers through grade retention, early tracking and special education. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 129 (1 ULiège)![]() ![]() Dupont, Virginie ![]() ![]() ![]() Conference (2013, August) Detailed reference viewed: 30 (0 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() ![]() Report (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 599 (23 ULiège)![]() Blondin, Christiane ![]() ![]() Report (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 103 (8 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Doctoral thesis (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 274 (23 ULiège)![]() ![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Conference (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 20 (0 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Scientific conference (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 44 (1 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() ![]() in Administration et Education (2012), 134 Detailed reference viewed: 145 (39 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() in L’évaluation des compétences en milieu scolaire et professionnel (2012) Detailed reference viewed: 63 (12 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() ![]() ![]() Report (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 152 (30 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Scientific conference (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 40 (7 ULiège)![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() Scientific conference (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 38 (0 ULiège)![]() ![]() Chenu, Florent ![]() in Congrès d'Actualité de la Recherche en Education et Formation. Symposium Approche par compétences en éduction et formation : quelles contraintes et incidences sur l’activité de l’évaluateur ? Université de Genève, Suisse, Septembre 2010. (2011) Detailed reference viewed: 37 (4 ULiège) |
||