References of "Ajamieh, Sara"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe explicit use of PRISMA and its effect on the reporting completeness of meta-analyses in the field of behavioral and social sciences
Leclercq, Victoria ULiege; Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege; Ajamieh, Sara ULiege et al

Poster (2019, May 14)

Objectives: To investigate the effect of the explicit use of PRISMA, a statement designed to help authors to report meta-analyses (MAs), on the reporting quality of MAs in behavioral and social sciences ... [more ▼]

Objectives: To investigate the effect of the explicit use of PRISMA, a statement designed to help authors to report meta-analyses (MAs), on the reporting quality of MAs in behavioral and social sciences. Methods: We evaluated a random sample of 207 MAs indexed in PsycINFO in 2016; 100 explicitly used PRISMA and 107 did not. Two authors independently checked the 27 PRISMA items and extracted factors that could potentially be associated with reporting quality. Results: From our 207 MAs, perfect adherence to PRISMA was found in less than 4%, of which 87% explicitly used PRISMA. The following items were significantly more frequently encountered in MAs that explicitly used PRISMA: structured summary, protocol and registration, information sources, search strategy, study characteristics, results of individual studies, funding, study selection, risk of bias in individual study and bias across studies. The journals’ impact factors, the endorsement of PRISMA by the journal, the number of authors, the country of the first author, the open access of the article and the design of the studies were significantly and positively associated with the explicit PRISMA use. Conclusions: Even if far from optimal, the explicit use of PRISMA has a positive influence on the reporting completeness of MAs. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (2 ULiège)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe methodological quality of meta-analyses in behavioral and social sciences: leads for enhancements according to AMSTAR 2
Leclercq, Victoria ULiege; Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege; Ajamieh, Sara ULiege et al

Poster (2019, May 14)

Objectives: To investigate the methodological quality in meta-analyses (MAs) published in behavioral and social sciences. Methods: We evaluated a random sample of 207 MAs indexed in PsycINFO database in ... [more ▼]

Objectives: To investigate the methodological quality in meta-analyses (MAs) published in behavioral and social sciences. Methods: We evaluated a random sample of 207 MAs indexed in PsycINFO database in 2016. Two authors independently extracted methodologic characteristics of all MAs with the 16 items of AMSTAR2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2). AMSTAR2 allows to assess the methodological quality of MAs that classifies them in 4 categories: critically low, low, moderate and high. Results: From the 207 MAs, according to AMSTAR2 criteria, 95% of MAs were rated as critically low. Statistical methods were appropriate and publication bias well evaluated in respectively 87% and 70% of the MAs. However, much improvement is needed in data collection and analysis: Publication of the research protocol (in 11% of MAs), comprehensive literature search strategy (44%), assessment (37%) and interpretation (29%) of risk of bias in individual included studies and presentation of excluded studies (11%). Conclusions: The methodological quality of MAs of our sample was critically low, according to AMSTAR2 criteria. Some efforts could improve tremendously the methodological quality of behavioral and social sciences MAs and thus gain in robustness and reliability. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 21 (3 ULiège)
Full Text
See detailThe use of PRISMA statement improves the reporting quality of meta-analyses published in the field of psychology
Leclercq, Victoria ULiege; Beaudart, Charlotte ULiege; Ajamieh, Sara ULiege et al

in Value in Health Regional Issues (2018, October), 21

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (13 ULiège)